The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network
Open accessAbstract
Current yeast interactome network maps contain several hundred molecular complexes with limited and somewhat controversial representation of direct binary interactions. We carried out a comparative quality assessment of current yeast interactome data sets, demonstrating that high-throughput yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening provides high-quality binary interaction information. Because a large fraction of the yeast binary interactome remains to be mapped, we developed an empirically controlled mapping framework to produce a “second-generation” high-quality, high-throughput Y2H data set covering ∼20% of all yeast binary interactions. Both Y2H and affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP/MS) data are of equally high quality but of a fundamentally different and complementary nature, resulting in networks with different topological and biological properties. Compared to co-complex interactome models, this binary map is enriched for transient signaling interactions and intercomplex connections with a highly significant clustering between essential proteins. Rather than correlating with essentiality, protein connectivity correlates with genetic pleiotropy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several high-throughput experimental techniques have been designed to identify interacting protein partners23–26, but their results are far from complete and are often mutually inconsistent.”
From AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Yeast two hybrid (Y2H), affinity-purification mass spectrometry (APMS), and other high-throughput experimental approaches have identified many pairs of interacting proteins in yeast and other organisms (1–5), but there are discrepancies between sets generated using the different methods and considerable false positive and false negative rates (6–8).”
From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“In a first set of calculations, we found that even with the advantages of S. cerevisiae and improved ortholog identification, the statistical method (Direct Coupling Analysis, DCA) we had used in our previous coevolution-guided protein-protein interaction (PPI) screen in Prokaryotes (9) (the more accurate GREMLIN (11) method is too slow for this) could not effectively distinguish a “gold standard””
From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · Cited by 7,368
Lethality and centrality in protein networks
Jeong, H., Mason, S., Barabási, A., & Oltvai, Z. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075138 · Cited by 5,327
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Gavin, A., Böesche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A., Cruciat, C., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415141a · Cited by 4,729
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A. M., Bader, G. D., Moore, L., Adams, S., Millar, A., Taylor, P. P., Bennett, K. L., Boutilier, K., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415180a · Cited by 3,573
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566
Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04670 · Cited by 2,964
Self-citationTranscriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Lee, T. I., Rinaldi, N. J., Robert, F., Odom, D. T., Bar-Joseph, Z., Gerber, G. K., Hannett, N. M., Harbison, C. T., Thompson, C. M., Simon, I., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075090 · Cited by 2,956
Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network
Rual, J.-F. M., Venkatesan, K., Hao, T., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Dricot, A., Li, N., Berriz, G. F., Gibbons, F. D., Dreze, M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou, N., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04209 · Cited by 2,904
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- I. Remy, S. W. Michnick, Methods Mol. Biol.261, 411 (2004).
- A. M. Dudley, D. M. Janse, A. Tanay, R. Shamir, G. M. Church, Mol. Syst. Biol.1, 0001 (2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Multi-Scale Sequence Correlations Increase Proteome Structural Disorder and Promiscuity
Afek, A., Shakhnovich, E. I., & Lukatsky, D. B. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.056 · Cited by 14
An ensemble framework for identifying essential proteins
Zhang, X., Xiao, W., Acencio, M. L., Lemke, N., & Wang, X. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1166-7 · Cited by 13
The Notch Interactome: Complexity in Signaling Circuitry
Ho, D. M., Guruharsha, K. G., & Artavanis‐Tsakonas, S. (2018) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89512-3_7 · Cited by 14
Link prediction in recommender systems with confidence measures
Su, Z., Zheng, X., Ai, J., Shang, L., & Shen, Y. (2019) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.5099565 · Cited by 14
SWR1-Independent Association of H2A.Z to the LINC Complex Promotes Meiotic Chromosome Motion
González-Arranz, S., Gardner, J. M., Yu, Z., Patel, N. J., Heldrich, J., Santos, B., Carballo, J. A., Jaspersen, S. L., Hochwagen, A., & San-Segundo, P. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.594092 · Cited by 14
Bulyk, M. L., & Walhout, A. J. M. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385944-0.00004-6 · Cited by 14
Auditory proteomics: Methods, accomplishments and challenges
Jamesdaniel, S., Salvi, R., & Coling, D. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.026 · Cited by 14
Schramm, S., Jayaswal, V., Goel, A., Li, S. S., Yang, J. Y. H., Mann, G. J., & Wilkins, M. R. (2013) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201200570 · Cited by 14
Molecular Network Analysis and Applications
Zhang, M., Deng, J., Fang, C. V., Zhang, X., & Lu, L. J. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470669716.ch11 · Cited by 14
Schuldiner, M., & Weissman, J. S. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a013284 · Cited by 15
Global analysis of protein homomerization in Saccharomyces cerevisiaePreprint
Kim, Y. S., Jung, J. P., Pack, C., & Huh, W. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.231860.117 · Cited by 14
Evolutionary conservation of sequence motifs at sites of protein modification
Li, S., & Dohlman, H. G. (2023) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104617 · Cited by 12
Assessment of high-confidence protein–protein interactome in yeast
Karagoz, K., & Arğa, K. Y. (2013) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2013.03.002 · Cited by 13
Analyzing protein–protein interactions in the post-interactomic era. Are we ready for the endgame?
Johnsson, N. (2014) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.023 · Cited by 13
Schuette, S., Piatkowski, B. T., Corley, A., Lang, D., & Geisler, M. J. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0524-1 · Cited by 13
Current Understanding of the TCTP Interactome
Li, S., & Ge, F. (2017) · Results and problems in cell differentiation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67591-6_5 · Cited by 13
Yao, H., Wang, X., Chen, P., Hai, L., Jin, K., Yao, L., Mao, C., & Chen, X. (2018) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.18.00144 · Cited by 13
Degree difference: a simple measure to characterize structural heterogeneity in complex networks
Farzam, A., Samal, A., & Jost, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78336-9 · Cited by 13
Interactome of Arabidopsis Thaliana
Yılmaz, M., Paulic, M., & Seidel, T. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11030350 · Cited by 12
Alternative splicing and protein interaction data sets
Talavera, D., Robertson, D. L., & Lovell, S. C. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2540 · Cited by 13
Kumar, T., Blondel, L., & Extavour, C. G. M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54082 · Cited by 14
Quantitative Tagless Copurification: A Method to Validate and Identify Protein-Protein Interactions
Shatsky, M., Dong, M., Liu, H., Yang, L. L., Choi, M. W., Singer, M. E., Geller, J. T., Fisher, S. J., Hall, S. C., Hazen, T. C., et al. (2016) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m115.057117 · Cited by 13
Carvunis, A., Roth, F. P., Calderwood, M. A., Cusick, M. E., Superti‐Furga, G., & Vidal, M. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385944-0.00003-4 · Cited by 12
Self-citationAn Efficient Drug-Target Interaction Mining Algorithm in Heterogeneous Biological Networks
Li, C., Sun, J., Xiong, Y., & Zheng, G. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13186-3_7 · Cited by 13
Combining complex networks and data mining: why and howPreprint
Zanin, M., Papo, D., Sousa, P., Menasalvas, E., Nicchi, A., Kubik, E., & Boccaletti, S. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/054064 · Cited by 13
Challenges and opportunities in the network medicine of complex diseases
d’Andrea, V., Loscalzo, J., & Domenico, M. D. (2025) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2025.100920 · Cited by 19
Perez, A. M., & Thorner, J. W. (2018) · Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.21500 · Cited by 15
Optimally Orienting Physical Networks
Silverbush, D., Elberfeld, M., & Sharan, R. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20036-6_39 · Cited by 12
Ali, W., & Deane, C. M. (2010) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c004430j · Cited by 12
Wang, X., & Jin, Y. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4085-8 · Cited by 12
Sensitive Readout for Microfluidic High-Throughput Applications using Scanning SQUID Microscopy
Wissberg, S., Ronen, M., Oren, Z., Gerber, D., & Kalisky, B. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58307-w · Cited by 12
Review of multimer protein–protein interaction complex topology and structure prediction*
Sun, D., Liu, S., & Gong, X. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abb659 · Cited by 11
Feature Fusion Based Subgraph Classification for Link Prediction
Liu, Z., Lai, D., Li, C., & Wang, M. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411966 · Cited by 12
Oxidative Stress Responses and Nutrient Starvation in MCHM Treated Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Ayers, M. C., Sherman, Z. N., & Gallagher, J. E. G. (2020) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.120.401661 · Cited by 12
Vir1p, the yeast homolog of virilizer, is required for mRNA m6A methylation and meiosis
Park, Z. M., Belnap, E., Remillard, M., & Rose, M. D. (2023) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad043 · Cited by 12
Lo, Y., Huang, S., Luo, Y.-C., Lin, C., & Yang, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116347 · Cited by 12
The Role of Protein Interactions in Mediating Essentiality and Synthetic Lethality
Talavera, D., Robertson, D. L., & Lovell, S. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062866 · Cited by 12
Stochastic effects as a force to increase the complexity of signaling networks
Kuwahara, H., & Gao, X. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02297 · Cited by 12
Cliques in mitotic spindle network bring kinetochore‐associated complexes to form dependence pathway
Chen, T.-C., Lee, S., Chan, C., Juang, Y., Hong, Y., Huang, Y.-H., Lai, J., Kao, C., & Huang, C. F. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900231 · Cited by 12
Link Prediction Using BenefitRanks in Weighted Networks
Lin, Z., Xiong, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2012) · Web Intelligence · doi:10.5555/2457524.2457624 · Cited by 12
The Mpn1 RNA exonuclease: Cellular functions and implication in disease
Shchepachev, V., & Azzalin, C. M. (2013) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.05.005 · Cited by 12
Probabilistic functional gene societies
Lee, I. (2011) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.01.003 · Cited by 12
Waaijers, S., Koorman, T., Kerver, J., & Boxem, M. (2013) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr400047p · Cited by 13
Shim, J. (2016) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2016.08.001 · Cited by 12
In vivo mRNA display enables large-scale proteomics by next generation sequencing
Oikonomou, P., Salatino, R., & Tavazoie, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002650117 · Cited by 13
Topolska, M., Roelants, F. M., Edward, P., & Thorner, J. W. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10121598 · Cited by 13
An omics perspective of protein disorder
Bellay, J., Michaut, M., Kim, T. P., Han, S., Çolak, R., Myers, C. L., & Kim, P. M. (2011) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c1mb05235g · Cited by 12
Combined Database System for Binary Protein Interaction and Co-complex Association
Han, Y., Sun, C.-H., Kim, M., & Yi, G. (2009) · International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/iacsit-sc.2009.42 · Cited by 12
Tuikkala, J., Vähämaa, H., Salmela, P., Nevalainen, O., & Aittokallio, T. A. (2012) · BioData Mining · doi:10.1186/1756-0381-5-2 · Cited by 12
Hase, T., Niimura, Y., & Tanaka, H. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-358 · Cited by 12
Noßmann, M., Boysen, J. M., Krüger, T., König, C. C., Hillmann, F., Münder, T., & Brakhage, A. A. (2018) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-018-0891-z · Cited by 12
A protein network-guided screen for cell cycle regulators in Drosophila
Guest, S. T., Yu, J., Liu, D., Hines, J. A., Kashat, M. A., & Finley, R. L. (2011) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-5-65 · Cited by 11
Protein Interaction Networks: Protein Domain Interaction and Protein Function Prediction
Qi, Y., & Noble, W. S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16345-6_21 · Cited by 11
Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction via Graph Signal Processing
Colonnese, S., Petti, M., Farina, L., Scarano, G., & Cuomo, F. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3119569 · Cited by 11
Urquiza, J., Rojas, I., Pomares, H., Herrera, L. J., Pérez-Florido, J., Valenzuela, O., & Cepero, M. (2012) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.01.010 · Cited by 11
Comparing Voronoi and Laguerre Tessellations in the Protein-Protein Docking Context
Bourquard, T., Bernauer, J., Azé, J., & Anne Poupon, B. (2009) · International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/isvd.2009.11 · Cited by 11
Tutorial on biological networks
Vital-Lopez, F. G., Memišević, V., & Dutta, B. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1061 · Cited by 11
Alkan, F., & Erten, C. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw655 · Cited by 12
Maximizing spreading in complex networks with risk in node activation
Xue, L., Zhang, P., & Zeng, A. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.064 · Cited by 11
Link Prediction Using BenefitRanks in Weighted Networks
Lin, Z., Yun, X., & Zhu, Y. (2012) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2012.204 · Cited by 11
Roles of Ubiquitin in Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Protein Degradation (ERAD)
Goder, V. (2012) · Current Protein and Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/138920312802430572 · Cited by 11
Uyttendaele, I., Lavens, D., Catteeuw, D., Lemmens, I. H., Bovijn, C., Tavernier, J. H., & Peelman, F. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044143 · Cited by 11
Self-citationThe severity of mental disorders is linked to interaction among candidate genes
Tiwary, B. K. (2012) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c2ib20066j · Cited by 11
Investigating the impact human protein–protein interaction networks have on disease-gene analysis
Browne, F., Wang, H., & Zheng, H. (2016) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-016-0503-5 · Cited by 11
Use of the Yeast Two-Hybrid System to Identify Targets of Fungal Effectors
Lu, S. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-501-5_11 · Cited by 11
A map of binary SARS-CoV-2 protein interactions implicates host immune regulation and ubiquitinationPreprint
Kim, D.-K., Weller, B., Lin, C.-W., Sheykhkarimli, D., Knapp, J. J., Kishore, N., Sauer, M., Rayhan, A., Young, V., la Rosa, N. M.-D., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.15.433877 · Cited by 11
Self-citationVisualization of the interactome: What are we looking at?
Fung, D. C. Y., Li, S. S., Goel, A., Hong, S., & Wilkins, M. R. (2012) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201100454 · Cited by 11
Assigning Confidence Scores to Protein–Protein Interactions
Yu, J., Murali, T., & Finley, R. L. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-455-1_9 · Cited by 10
Barradas‐Bautista, D., & Fernández‐Recio, J. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183643 · Cited by 10
Pby1 is a direct partner of the Dcp2 decapping enzyme
Charenton, C., Gaudon-Plesse, C., Back, R., Ulryck, N., Cosson, L., Séraphin, B., & Graille, M. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa337 · Cited by 7
A review of phosphatidate phosphatase assays
Dey, P., Han, G.-S., & Carman, G. M. (2020) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r120001092 · Cited by 10
Rid, R., Straßer, W., Siegl, D., Frech, C., Kommenda, M., Kern, T., Hintner, H., Bauer, J. W., & Önder, K. (2013) · Assay and Drug Development Technologies · doi:10.1089/adt.2013.506 · Cited by 10
Decomposing protein interactome networks by graph entropy
Lian, H., Song, C., & Cho, Y. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2010.5706633 · Cited by 10
A two-step framework for inferring direct protein-protein interaction network from AP-MS data
Tian, B., Zhao, C., Gu, F., & He, Z. (2017) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/s12918-017-0452-y · Cited by 10
Kwon, D., Lee, D., Kim, J.-Y., Lee, J., Sim, M., & Kim, J. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gky378 · Cited by 10
Zou, X., An, K., Wu, Y., & Ye, Z. (2018) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/s12918-018-0567-9 · Cited by 11
Collective influencers in protein interaction networks
Boltz, T. A., Devkota, P., & Wuchty, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40410-2 · Cited by 11
Jia, Y., Kowalski, P., & Lopez, I. (2021) · Current Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.crtox.2021.02.006 · Cited by 10
Spectral density of random graphs: convergence properties and application in model fitting
Santos, S. D. S., Fujita, A., & Matias, C. (2021) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnab041 · Cited by 10
Ortho_Sim_Loc: Essential protein prediction using orthology and priority-based similarity approach
Payra, A. K., Saha, B., & Ghosh, A. (2021) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2021.107503 · Cited by 10
Sir3 heterochromatin protein promotes non‐homologous end joining by direct inhibition of Sae2
Bordelet, H., Costa, R., Brocas, C., Dépagne, J., Veaute, X., Busso, D., Batté, A., Guérois, R., Marcand, S., & Dubrana, K. (2021) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2021108813 · Cited by 10
The Topology of the Growing Human Interactome Data
Janjić, V., & Pržulj, N. (2014) · Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics · doi:10.1515/jib-2014-238 · Cited by 10
Yeast Irc6p is a novel type of conserved clathrin coat accessory factor related to small G proteins
Gorynia, S., Lorenz, T., Costaguta, G., Daboussi, L., Cascio, D., & Payne, G. S. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e12-07-0507 · Cited by 10
Sequence correlations shape protein promiscuity
Lukatsky, D. B., Afek, A., & Shakhnovich, E. I. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3624332 · Cited by 11
Thakur, S., Jha, S., Roy-Barman, S., & Chattoo, B. B. (2009) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-316 · Cited by 10
Interaction networks: Lessons from large‐scale studies in yeast
Cagney, G. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900177 · Cited by 10
Nandy, S. K., Jouhten, P., & Nielsen, J. (2010) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-4-68 · Cited by 10
Hoggard, T., Liachko, I., Burt, C., Meikle, T., Jiang, K., Crăciun, G., Dunham, M. J., & Fox, C. A. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.027904 · Cited by 10
Slx5/Slx8‐dependent ubiquitin hotspots on chromatin contribute to stress tolerance
Höpfler, M., Kern, M. J., Straub, T., Prytuliak, R., Habermann, B. H., Pfander, B., & Jentsch, S. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2018100368 · Cited by 11
Ren, L., McLean, J. R., Hazbun, T. R., Fields, S., Kooi, C. W. V., Ohi, M. D., & Gould, K. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/62e74a1c-c922-495b-9aaf-eebfe6b85ff5 · Cited by 10
A novel strategy for dynamic modeling of genome-scale interaction networks
Borzou, P., Ghaisari, J., Izadi, I., Eshraghi, Y., & Gheisari, Y. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad079 · Cited by 9
Improved Link Prediction Method for Maritime Silk Road Shipping Network Using Composite Index
Zhu, J., Yang, Y., Jin, Y., & Liu, W. (2023) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981231209032 · Cited by 9
Computational tools to predict context-specific protein complexes
Csikász‐Nagy, A., Fichó, E., Noto, S., & Reguly, I. Z. (2024) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102883 · Cited by 11
Next-Generation Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening to Discover Protein–Protein Interactions
Elmore, J. M., Zapata, V. V., & Wise, R. P. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3327-4_19 · Cited by 9
Topological Characteristics of Molecular Networks
Milenković, T., & Pržulj, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0320-3_2 · Cited by 9
Functional genomics in the study of yeast cell polarity: moving in the right direction
Styles, E. B., Youn, J., Ušaj, M. M., & Andrews, B. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0118 · Cited by 9
Scoring Function Based on Weighted Residue Network
Jiao, X., & Chang, S. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12128773 · Cited by 9
FRep: A Fluorescent Protein-Based Bioprobe for in Vivo Detection of Protein–DNA Interactions
Shahravan, S. H., Li, I. T. S., Truong, K., & Shin, J. A. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac2024602 · Cited by 9
Latent Model-Based Clustering for Biological Discovery
Bing, X., Bunea, F., Royer, M., & Das, J. (2018) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.03.018 · Cited by 9
The connectivity of graphs of graphs with self-loops and a given degree sequence
Nishimura, J. (2018) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cny008 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H., Braun, P., Yıldırım, M. A., Lemmens, I., Venkatesan, K., Sahalie, J., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Gebreab, F., Li, N., Simonis, N., Hao, T., Rual, J.-F., Dricot, A., Vazquez, A., Murray, R. R., Simon, C., Tardivo, L., Tam, S., Svrzikapa, N., Fan, C., de Smet, A.-S., Motyl, A., Hudson, M. E., Park, J., Xin, X., Cusick, M. E., Moore, T., Boone, C., Snyder, M., Roth, F. P., Barabási, A.-L., Tavernier, J., Hill, D. E., & Vidal, M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
- Northeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Haiyuan
- Yıldırım, Muhammed A.
- Vidal, Marc
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2008-10-03
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 5898
- Pages
- 104-110
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC2746753
- OpenAlex
- W2109248504
- Cited by
- 1,392
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 172
- FWCI
- 51.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (U01A1070499-01)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG001715, R01HG003224, HG003224)
- National Cancer Institute (U56CA113004)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI070499)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- yeast interactome, protein-protein interaction network, yeast two-hybrid screening, affinity purification mass spectrometry, protein complexes, essential proteins, protein connectivity, pleiotropy, network topology
- MeSH terms
- Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mass Spectrometry, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Computational Biology, Proteome, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Protein Array Analysis, Proteomics, Gene Regulatory Networks, Metabolic Networks and Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review