The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network
Open accessAbstract
Current yeast interactome network maps contain several hundred molecular complexes with limited and somewhat controversial representation of direct binary interactions. We carried out a comparative quality assessment of current yeast interactome data sets, demonstrating that high-throughput yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening provides high-quality binary interaction information. Because a large fraction of the yeast binary interactome remains to be mapped, we developed an empirically controlled mapping framework to produce a “second-generation” high-quality, high-throughput Y2H data set covering ∼20% of all yeast binary interactions. Both Y2H and affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP/MS) data are of equally high quality but of a fundamentally different and complementary nature, resulting in networks with different topological and biological properties. Compared to co-complex interactome models, this binary map is enriched for transient signaling interactions and intercomplex connections with a highly significant clustering between essential proteins. Rather than correlating with essentiality, protein connectivity correlates with genetic pleiotropy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several high-throughput experimental techniques have been designed to identify interacting protein partners23–26, but their results are far from complete and are often mutually inconsistent.”
From AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Yeast two hybrid (Y2H), affinity-purification mass spectrometry (APMS), and other high-throughput experimental approaches have identified many pairs of interacting proteins in yeast and other organisms (1–5), but there are discrepancies between sets generated using the different methods and considerable false positive and false negative rates (6–8).”
From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“In a first set of calculations, we found that even with the advantages of S. cerevisiae and improved ortholog identification, the statistical method (Direct Coupling Analysis, DCA) we had used in our previous coevolution-guided protein-protein interaction (PPI) screen in Prokaryotes (9) (the more accurate GREMLIN (11) method is too slow for this) could not effectively distinguish a “gold standard””
From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · Cited by 7,368
Lethality and centrality in protein networks
Jeong, H., Mason, S., Barabási, A., & Oltvai, Z. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075138 · Cited by 5,327
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Gavin, A., Böesche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A., Cruciat, C., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415141a · Cited by 4,729
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A. M., Bader, G. D., Moore, L., Adams, S., Millar, A., Taylor, P. P., Bennett, K. L., Boutilier, K., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415180a · Cited by 3,573
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566
Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04670 · Cited by 2,964
Self-citationTranscriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Lee, T. I., Rinaldi, N. J., Robert, F., Odom, D. T., Bar-Joseph, Z., Gerber, G. K., Hannett, N. M., Harbison, C. T., Thompson, C. M., Simon, I., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075090 · Cited by 2,956
Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network
Rual, J.-F. M., Venkatesan, K., Hao, T., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Dricot, A., Li, N., Berriz, G. F., Gibbons, F. D., Dreze, M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou, N., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04209 · Cited by 2,904
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- I. Remy, S. W. Michnick, Methods Mol. Biol.261, 411 (2004).
- A. M. Dudley, D. M. Janse, A. Tanay, R. Shamir, G. M. Church, Mol. Syst. Biol.1, 0001 (2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
A gene ontology inferred from molecular networks
Dutkowski, J., Kramer, M., Surma, M. A., Balakrishnan, R., Cherry, J. M., Krogan, N. J., & Ideker, T. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2463 · Cited by 184
Arabidopsis PPP family of serine/threonine protein phosphatases: many targets but few engines
Uhrig, R. G., Labandera, A., & Moorhead, G. B. G. (2013) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.05.004 · Cited by 184
Huang, S. C., & Fraenkel, E. (2009) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000350 · Cited by 181
Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry‐based proteomics data sets
Kumar, C., & Mann, M. (2009) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.035 · Cited by 178
The small subunit processome in ribosome biogenesis—progress and prospects
Phipps, K. R., Charette, J. M., & Baserga, S. J. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.57 · Cited by 184
Dynamic patterns of information flow in complex networks
Harush, U., & Barzel, B. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01916-3 · Cited by 172
A network medicine approach to human disease
Zanzoni, A., Soler‐López, M., & Aloy, P. (2009) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.001 · Cited by 172
Computational Approaches for Analyzing Information Flow in Biological Networks
Kholodenko, B. Ν., Yaffe, M. B., & Kölch, W. (2012) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002961 · Cited by 176
iPfam: a database of protein family and domain interactions found in the Protein Data Bank
Finn, R. D., Miller, B. L., Clements, J., & Bateman, A. G. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1210 · Cited by 169
Functional Modules in the Arabidopsis Core Cell Cycle Binary Protein–Protein Interaction Network
Boruc, J., den Daele, H. V., Hollunder, J., Rombauts, S., Mylle, E., Hilson, P., Inzé, D., Veylder, L. D., & Russinova, E. (2010) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.073635 · Cited by 169
A Comprehensive Dataset of Genes with a Loss-of-Function Mutant Phenotype in Arabidopsis
Lloyd, J. P., & Meinke, D. W. (2012) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.111.192393 · Cited by 163
Lee, K. K., Sardiu, M. E., Swanson, S. K., Gilmore, J. M., Torok, M., Grant, P. A., Florens, L. A., Workman, J. L., & Washburn, M. P. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.40 · Cited by 171
Interactome INSIDER: a structural interactome browser for genomic studies
Meyer, M. J., Beltrán, J. F., Liang, S., Fragoza, R., Rumack, A., Liang, J. H., Wei, X., & Yu, H. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4540 · Cited by 157
Self-citationPRIN: a predicted rice interactome network
Gu, H., Zhu, P., Jiao, Y., Meng, Y., & Chen, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-161 · Cited by 160
The foundations of plant intelligence
TREWAVAS, A. J. (2017) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2016.0098 · Cited by 167
Systematic Functional Annotation and Visualization of Biological Networks
Baryshnikova, A. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.04.014 · Cited by 148
An in vitro microfluidic approach to generating protein-interaction networks
Gerber, D., Maerkl, S. J., & Quake, S. R. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1289 · Cited by 151
High-Quality Binary Interactome Mapping
Dreze, M., Monachello, D., Lurin, C., Cusick, M. E., HILL, D. E., Vidal, M., & Falter‐Braun, P. (2010) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(10)70012-4 · Cited by 156
Self-citationA membrane protein / signaling protein interaction network for Arabidopsis version AMPv2
Lalonde, S. (2010) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2010.00024 · Cited by 151
Semi-supervised multi-task learning for predicting interactions between HIV-1 and human proteins
Qi, Y., Taştan, Ö., Carbonell, J. G., Klein‐Seetharaman, J., & Weston, J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq394 · Cited by 153
Scaffolds: interaction platforms for cellular signalling circuits
Zeke, A., Lukács, M., Lim, W. A., & Reményi, A. (2009) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.05.007 · Cited by 158
Bringing order to protein disorder through comparative genomics and genetic interactions
Bellay, J., Han, S., Michaut, M., Kim, T., Costanzo, M., Andrews, B., Boone, C. M., Bader, G. D., Myers, C. L., & Kim, P. M. (2011) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r14 · Cited by 154
Self-citationQureshi, A. H., Chaoji, V., Maiguel, D. A., Faridi, M. H., Barth, C. J., Salem, S. M., Singhal, M., Stoub, D. G., Krastins, B., Ogihara, M., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007627 · Cited by 152
Edgotype: a fundamental link between genotype and phenotype
Sahni, N., Yi, S. S., Zhong, Q., Jailkhani, N., Charloteaux, B., Cusick, M. E., & Vidal, M. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2013.11.002 · Cited by 150
Self-citationUNC-83 coordinates kinesin-1 and dynein activities at the nuclear envelope during nuclear migration
Fridolfsson, H. N., Ly, N., Meyerzon, M., & Starr, D. A. (2009) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.004 · Cited by 147
Proteome-Scale Human Interactomics
Luck, K., Sheynkman, G., Zhang, I., & Vidal, M. (2017) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2017.02.006 · Cited by 142
Self-citationComputational Prediction of Protein–Protein Interaction Networks: Algorithms and Resources
Zahiri, J., Bozorgmehr, J. H., & Masoudi‐Nejad, A. (2013) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/1389202911314060004 · Cited by 142
Fungal Membrane Organization: The Eisosome Concept
Douglas, L. M., & Konopka, J. B. (2014) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-091313-103507 · Cited by 140
Identification of Protein Interactions Involved in Cellular Signaling
Westermarck, J., Ivaska, J., & Corthals, G. L. (2013) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r113.027771 · Cited by 143
An Integrated View of Molecular Coevolution in Protein-Protein Interactions
Lovell, S. C., & Robertson, D. L. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq144 · Cited by 145
The role of protein interaction networks in systems biomedicine
Sevimoğlu, T., & Arğa, K. Y. (2014) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2014.08.008 · Cited by 141
Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Mutual Information Perspective
Tan, F., Xia, Y., & Zhu, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107056 · Cited by 140
The Arabidopsis Kinome: phylogeny and evolutionary insights into functional diversification
Zulawski, M., Schulze, G., Braginets, R., Hartmann, S. A., & Schulze, W. X. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-548 · Cited by 138
Revisiting Date and Party Hubs: Novel Approaches to Role Assignment in Protein Interaction Networks
Agarwal, S., Deane, C. M., Porter, M. A., & Jones, N. S. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000817 · Cited by 144
Pizzuti, C., & Rombo, S. E. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu034 · Cited by 139
Rapid selection of cyclic peptides that reduce α-synuclein toxicity in yeast and animal models
Kritzer, J. A., Hamamichi, S., McCaffery, J. M., Santagata, S., Naumann, T. A., Caldwell, K. A., Caldwell, G. A., & Lindquist, S. L. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.193 · Cited by 140
Network biology discovers pathogen contact points in host protein-protein interactomes
Ahmed, H., Howton, T. C., Sun, Y., Weinberger, N. V., Belkhadir, Y., & Mukhtar, M. S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04632-8 · Cited by 137
Xu, Z., Gan, L., Li, T., Xu, C., Chen, K., Wang, X., Qin, J. G., Chen, L., & Li, E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136506 · Cited by 137
The Golgi puppet master: COG complex at center stage of membrane trafficking interactions
Willett, R. A., Ungár, D., & Lupashin, V. V. (2013) · Histochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1007/s00418-013-1117-6 · Cited by 136
Urbanus, M. L., Quaile, A. T., Stogios, P. J., Morar, M., Rao, C., Leo, R. D., Evdokimova, E., Lam, M. H. Y., Oatway, C., Cuff, M. E., et al. (2016) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20167381 · Cited by 129
Early-Arriving Syp1p and Ede1p Function in Endocytic Site Placement and Formation in Budding Yeast
Stimpson, H. E. M., Toret, C. P., Cheng, A. T., Pauly, B. S., & Drubin, D. G. (2009) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-05-0429 · Cited by 141
Niles, B. J., Mogri, H., Hill, A., Vlahakis, A., & Powers, T. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117563109 · Cited by 134
Mairiang, D., Zhang, H., Sodja, A., Murali, T., Suriyaphol, P., Malasit, P., Limjindaporn, T., & Finley, R. L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053535 · Cited by 140
A survey of yeast genomic assays for drug and target discovery
Smith, A. M., Ammar, R., Nislow, C., & Giaever, G. N. (2010) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.012 · Cited by 137
Tan, D., Li, Q., Zhang, M., Liu, C., Ma, C., Zhang, P., Ding, Y., Fan, S., Li, T., Yang, B., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12509 · Cited by 133
Integrated systems analysis reveals a molecular network underlying autism spectrum disorders
Li, J., Shi, M., Ma, Z., Zhao, S., Euskirchen, G., Ziskin, J., Urban, A., Hallmayer, J., & Snyder, M. (2014) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20145487 · Cited by 132
Self-citationTopology-Free Querying of Protein Interaction Networks
Bruckner, S., Hüffner, F., Karp, R. M., Ron Shamir, A., & Sharan, R. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_6 · Cited by 132
Highly Efficient Framework for Predicting Interactions Between Proteins
You, Z., Zhou, M., Luo, X., & Li, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2524994 · Cited by 129
Pds5 promotes and protects cohesin acetylation
Chan, K., Gligoris, T. G., Upcher, W. R., Kato, Y., Shirahige, K., Nasmyth, K., & Beckouët, F. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1306900110 · Cited by 129
Falter‐Braun, P., Aubourg, S., Leene, J. V., Jaeger, G. D., & Claire Lurin, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120140 · Cited by 126
Building Macromolecular Assemblies by Information-driven Docking
Karaca, E., Melquiond, A. S. J., de Vries, S. J., Kastritis, P. L., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m000051-mcp201 · Cited by 131
Protein-protein interaction networks: unraveling the wiring of molecular machines within the cell
Rivas, J. D. L., & Fontanillo, C. (2012) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/els036 · Cited by 125
A Mesoscale Abscisic Acid Hormone Interactome Reveals a Dynamic Signaling Landscape in Arabidopsis
Lumba, S., Toh, S., Handfield, L., Swan, M., Liu, R., Youn, J., Cutler, S. R., Subramaniam, R., Provart, N. J., Moses, A. M., et al. (2014) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.004 · Cited by 124
The life of U6 small nuclear RNA, from cradle to grave
Didychuk, A. L., Butcher, S. E., & Brow, D. A. (2018) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.065136.117 · Cited by 123
Zhang, L., Pan, H., Su, Y., Zhang, X., & Niu, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2711038 · Cited by 123
Protein–protein interactions and genetic diseases: The interactome
Lage, K. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.028 · Cited by 125
A MapReduce based parallel SVM for large-scale predicting protein–protein interactions
You, Z., Yu, J., Zhu, L., Li, S., & Wen, Z.-K. (2014) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.05.072 · Cited by 121
Recent advances in charting protein–protein interaction: mass spectrometry-based approaches
Gavin, A., Maeda, K., & Kühner, S. (2010) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.007 · Cited by 124
Hos1 Deacetylates Smc3 to Close the Cohesin Acetylation Cycle
Borges, V., Lehane, C., Lopez‐Serra, L., Flynn, H. R., Skehel, M. J., Ben-Shahar, T. R., & Uhlmann, F. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.009 · Cited by 129
Challenges and Rewards of Interaction Proteomics
Wodak, S. J., Pu, S., Vlasblom, J., & Séraphin, B. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r800014-mcp200 · Cited by 119
Corbett, K. D., Yip, C. K., Ee, L.-S., Walz, T., Amon, A., & Harrison, S. C. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.017 · Cited by 120
The social and structural architecture of the yeast protein interactome
Michaelis, A. C., Brunner, A.-D., Zwiebel, M., Meier, F., Strauss, M. T., Bludau, I., & Mann, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06739-5 · Cited by 119
“By contrast, binary methods detect direct physical interactions between protein pairs 14,15 .”
BackgroundA mouse tissue transcription factor atlas
Zhou, Q., Liu, M., Xia, X., Gong, T., Feng, J., Liu, W., Liu, Y., Zhen, B., Wang, Y., Ding, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15089 · Cited by 119
A genome-wide map of human genetic interactions inferred from radiation hybrid genotypesPreprint
Lin, A., Wang, R. T., Ahn, S., Park, C. C., & Smith, D. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.104216.109 · Cited by 112
A Proteome-wide Fission Yeast Interactome Reveals Network Evolution Principles from Yeasts to Human
Vo, T. V., Das, J., Meyer, M. J., Cordero, N. A., Akturk, N., Wei, X., Fair, B. J., Degatano, A. G., Fragoza, R., Liu, L., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.037 · Cited by 116
Self-citationde Chassey, B., Aublin‐Gex, A., Ruggieri, A., Meyniel‐Schicklin, L., Pradezynski, F., Davoust, N., Chantier, T., Tafforeau, L., Mangeot, P.-E., Ciancia, C., et al. (2013) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003440 · Cited by 115
It's the machine that matters: Predicting gene function and phenotype from protein networks
Wang, P. I., & Marcotte, E. M. (2010) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2010.07.005 · Cited by 118
Interaction networks: From protein functions to drug discovery. A review
Chautard, É., Thierry‐Mieg, N., & Ricard‐Blum, S. (2008) · Pathologie Biologie · doi:10.1016/j.patbio.2008.10.004 · Cited by 122
Chen, Y., Sheng, J., Jiang, T., Stevens, J., Feng, X., & Wei, N. (2016) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-015-0418-5 · Cited by 117
Gandhi, M., Smith, B. A., Bovellan, M., Paavilainen, V. O., Daugherty-Clarke, K., Gelles, J., Lappalainen, P., & Goode, B. L. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.026 · Cited by 114
Exploring whole-genome duplicate gene retention with complex genetic interaction analysis
Kuzmin, E., VanderSluis, B., Ba, A. N. N., Wang, W., Koch, E. N., Ušaj, M., Khmelinskii, A., Ušaj, M. M., van Leeuwen, J. S., Kraus, O. Z., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz5667 · Cited by 112
Self-citationGenomic survey, expression profile and co-expression network analysis of OsWD40 family in rice
Ouyang, Y., Huang, X., Lu, Z., & Yao, J. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-100 · Cited by 118
Protein–protein interaction networks: the puzzling riches
Wodak, S. J., Vlasblom, J., Turinsky, A. L., & Pu, S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2013.08.002 · Cited by 113
Ma, X., Sun, P., & Qin, G. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.06.025 · Cited by 112
Human Milk Proteins: An Interactomics and Updated Functional Overview
D’Alessandro, A., Scaloni, A., & Zolla, L. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr100123f · Cited by 112
Dominating Biological Networks
Milenković, T., Memišević, V., Bonato, A., & Pržulj, N. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023016 · Cited by 107
Das, S., & Chakrabarti, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80900-2 · Cited by 112
Bodt, S. D., Proost, S., Vandepoele, K., Rouzé, P., & de Peer, Y. V. (2009) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-288 · Cited by 109
Viral Perturbations of Host Networks Reflect Disease Etiology
Gulbahce, N., Yan, H., Dricot, A., Padi, M., Byrdsong, D., Franchi, R., Lee, D., Rozenblatt–Rosen, O., Mar, J. C., Calderwood, M. A., et al. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002531 · Cited by 110
Self-citationDosage suppression genetic interaction networks enhance functional wiring diagrams of the cell
Magtanong, L., Ho, C. H., Barker, S. L., Jiao, W., Baryshnikova, A., Bahr, S., Smith, A. M., Heisler, L. E., Choy, J. S., Kuzmin, E., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1855 · Cited by 108
Self-citationStrategies for protein synthetic biology
Grünberg, R., & Serrano, L. G. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq139 · Cited by 111
Bacterial protein networks: properties and functions
Typas, A., & Sourjik, V. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3508 · Cited by 108
Pooled‐matrix protein interaction screens using Barcode Fusion Genetics
Yachie, N., Petsalaki, E., Mellor, J. C., Weile, J., Jacob, Y., Verby, M., Ozturk, S. B., Li, S., Coté, A. G., Mosca, R., et al. (2016) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20156660 · Cited by 106
Self-citationAlignNemo: A Local Network Alignment Method to Integrate Homology and Topology
Ciriello, G., Mina, M., Guzzi, P. H., Cannataro, M., & Guerra, C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038107 · Cited by 107
United Complex Centrality for Identification of Essential Proteins from PPI Networks
Li, M., Lu, Y., Niu, Z., & Wu, F. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2015.2394487 · Cited by 107
Verschueren, E., Husain, B., Yuen, K. C. Y., Sun, Y. E., Paduchuri, S., Şenbabaoğlu, Y., Lehoux, I. E., Arena, T. A., Wilson, B., Lianoglou, S., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.007 · Cited by 107
Statistical inference links data and theory in network science
Peel, L., Peixoto, T. P., & Domenico, M. D. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34267-9 · Cited by 119
Molecular signaling network complexity is correlated with cancer patient survivability
Breitkreutz, D. Y., Hlatky, L., Rietman, E. A., & Tuszyński, J. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201416109 · Cited by 104
Simple sequence-based kernels do not predict protein–protein interactions
Yu, J., Guo, M., Needham, C. J., Huang, Y., Cai, L., & Westhead, D. R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq483 · Cited by 104
A Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A. (2009) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601983213 · Cited by 108
Mechanisms of tumor resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies
Hopper-Borge, E. A., Nasto, R. E., Ratushny, V., Weiner, L. M., Golemis, E. A., & Astsaturov, I. A. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1517/14712590902735795 · Cited by 109
Taxonomies of networks from community structure
Onnela, J.-P. “., Fenn, D. J., Reid, S., Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Fricker, M. D., & Jones, N. S. (2012) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.036104 · Cited by 109
Polypharmacology in Drug Discovery: A Review from Systems Pharmacology Perspective
Zhang, W., Bai, Y., Wang, Y., & Xiao, W. (2016) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612822666160224142812 · Cited by 105
Virus-host interactomics: new insights and opportunities for antiviral drug discovery
de Chassey, B., Meyniel‐Schicklin, L., Vonderscher, J., André, P., & Lotteau, V. (2014) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0115-1 · Cited by 106
s -core network decomposition: A generalization of k -core analysis to weighted networks
Eidsaa, M., & Almaas, E. (2013) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.88.062819 · Cited by 103
Biogeographic patterns of microbial association networks in paddy soil within Eastern China
Wan, X., Gao, Q., Zhao, J., Feng, J., Nostrand, J. D. V., Yang, Y., & Zhou, J. Z. (2019) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107696 · Cited by 104
Computational Approaches to Predict Protein–Protein Interactions in Crowded Cellular Environments
Grassmann, G., Miotto, M., Desantis, F., Rienzo, L. D., Tartaglia, G. G., Pastore, A., Ruocco, G., Monti, M. M., & Milanetti, E. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00550 · Cited by 109
C-GRAAL: Common-neighbors-based global GRAph ALignment of biological networks
Memišević, V., & Pržulj, N. (2012) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c2ib00140c · Cited by 103
Model Selection and Hypothesis Testing for Large-Scale Network Models with Overlapping Groups
Peixoto, T. P. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.011033 · Cited by 106
High-resolution network biology: connecting sequence with function
Ryan, C. J., Cimermančič, P., Szpiech, Z. A., Šali, A., Hernandez, R. D., & Krogan, N. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3574 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H., Braun, P., Yıldırım, M. A., Lemmens, I., Venkatesan, K., Sahalie, J., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Gebreab, F., Li, N., Simonis, N., Hao, T., Rual, J.-F., Dricot, A., Vazquez, A., Murray, R. R., Simon, C., Tardivo, L., Tam, S., Svrzikapa, N., Fan, C., de Smet, A.-S., Motyl, A., Hudson, M. E., Park, J., Xin, X., Cusick, M. E., Moore, T., Boone, C., Snyder, M., Roth, F. P., Barabási, A.-L., Tavernier, J., Hill, D. E., & Vidal, M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Center for Cancer Systems Biology (CCSB), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
- Northeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Haiyuan
- Yıldırım, Muhammed A.
- Vidal, Marc
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2008-10-03
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 5898
- Pages
- 104-110
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC2746753
- OpenAlex
- W2109248504
- Cited by
- 1,392
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 172
- FWCI
- 51.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (U01A1070499-01)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG001715, R01HG003224, HG003224)
- National Cancer Institute (U56CA113004)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI070499)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- yeast interactome, protein-protein interaction network, yeast two-hybrid screening, affinity purification mass spectrometry, protein complexes, essential proteins, protein connectivity, pleiotropy, network topology
- MeSH terms
- Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mass Spectrometry, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Computational Biology, Proteome, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Protein Array Analysis, Proteomics, Gene Regulatory Networks, Metabolic Networks and Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review