Cited by 1,748Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesLanguage and cultural evolution

The evolution of altruistic punishment

Open access
Boyd, Robert, Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel, Richerson, Peter J.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Both laboratory and field data suggest that people punish noncooperators even in one-shot interactions. Although such “altruistic punishment” may explain the high levels of cooperation in human societies, it creates an evolutionary puzzle: existing models suggest that altruistic cooperation among nonrelatives is evolutionarily stable only in small groups. Thus, applying such models to the evolution of altruistic punishment leads to the prediction that people will not incur costs to punish others to provide benefits to large groups of nonrelatives. However, here we show that an important asymmetry between altruistic cooperation and altruistic punishment allows altruistic punishment to evolve in populations engaged in one-time, anonymous interactions. This process allows both altruistic punishment and altruistic cooperation to be maintained even when groups are large and other parameter values approximate conditions that characterize cultural evolution in the small-scale societies in which humans lived for most of our prehistory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0630443100

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Punishment-based mechanisms are sensitive to errors that involve either punishing cooperators or not punishing free-riders.

    “Second, they are sensitive to errors that involve either punishing cooperators or not punishing free-riders23,30.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results report that a high probability of mistaken defection can make punishment too costly to evolve, and the model describes cooperators who occasionally defect and are then punished. The Results also show that insufficient punishment lets defectors persist, but our copy does not examine errors in which punishers fail to punish free-riders. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Altruistic punishment is a prominent solution to the challenge of free riding.

    “Free riding poses a major challenge to self-governance, and a prominent solution to this challenge has been altruistic punishment.”

    From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]25. Bowles, S., Choi, J. & Hopfensitz, A. J. Theor. Biol., in press. [DOI] [PubMed] Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J.
Affiliations
Santa Fe Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Boyd, Robert
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-03-11
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
3531-3535
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2155753204
Cited by
1,748
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 84
FWCI
193.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • University of California, Los Angeles
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
altruistic punishment, evolution of cooperation, one-shot interactions, anonymous interactions, large groups, evolutionarily stable strategy, cultural evolution, small-scale societies, human prehistory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review