Cited by 98Complex Systems and Decision MakingConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationResearch, Science, and Academia

From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments

Open access
Glynn, Pierre D., Voinov, Alexey A., Shapiro, Carl D., White, Paul A.·2017·Earth's Future

Abstract

Our different kinds of minds and types of thinking affect the ways we decide, take action, and cooperate (or not). Derived from these types of minds, innate biases, beliefs, heuristics, and values ( BBHV ) influence behaviors, often beneficially, when individuals or small groups face immediate, local, acute situations that they and their ancestors faced repeatedly in the past. BBHV , though, need to be recognized and possibly countered or used when facing new, complex issues or situations especially if they need to be managed for the benefit of a wider community, for the longer‐term and the larger‐scale. Taking BBHV into account, we explain and provide a cyclic science‐infused adaptive framework for (1) gaining knowledge of complex systems and (2) improving their management. We explore how this process and framework could improve the governance of science and policy for different types of systems and issues, providing examples in the area of natural resources, hazards, and the environment. Lastly, we suggest that an “Open Traceable Accountable Policy” initiative that followed our suggested adaptive framework could beneficially complement recent Open Data/Model science initiatives. Plain Language Summary Our review paper suggests that society can improve the management of natural resources and environments by (1) recognizing the sources of human decisions and thinking and understanding their role in the scientific progression to knowledge; (2) considering innate human needs an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2016ef000487

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PM offers benefits such as integrating knowledge across disciplines, accounting for the values and beliefs of various stakeholders, promoting co-learning and co-decision making, and facilitating dialogue between scientists and policymakers.

    “PM offers several benefits, such as integrating knowledge across disciplines, accounting for the values and beliefs of various stakeholders (Glynn et al., 2017), promoting colearning and co-decision making, and facilitating dialogue between scientists and policymakers (Paolisso and Trombley, 2017;Voinov et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

42 of the 156 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glynn, P. D., Voinov, A. A., Shapiro, C. D., & White, P. A.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (NL)
  • GNS Science (NZ)
Corresponding author
Glynn, Pierre D.
Venue
Earth's Future
Published
2017-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
356-378
ISSN
2328-4277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603779228
Cited by
98
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth s Future (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
cognitive biases, heuristics, human decision-making, natural resource management, environmental management, complex systems, open data, open models, human values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review