Cited by 238Social and Intergroup PsychologyNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Discussion effects on racial attitudes

Myers, David G., Bishop, George D.·1970·Science

Abstract

We predicted that discussion would enhance dominant group values, leading to increased polarization between homogeneously composed groups of high-, medium-, and low-prejudice high school subjects. In an experimental condition, group members made individual attitude judgments, discussed them, and remade judgments. Control groups discussed irrelevant materials before responding again to the attitude items. As predicted, discussion of the racial attitude items with others having similar attitudes significantly increased the gap between high- and low-prejudice groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.169.3947.778

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People sharing similar extreme opinions, such as racial prejudices, tend to strengthen their judgment and confidence after interacting with one another.

    “it has been shown that people sharing similar extreme opinions, such as racial prejudices, tend to strengthen their judgment and confidence after interacting with one another [12].”
  • Early experiments showed that opinions tend to get reinforced by group discussions involving people who initially share a similar judgment.

    “This result is also in line with early experiments showing that opinions tend to get reinforced by group discussions that involve people who initially share a similar judgment [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, D. G., & Bishop, G. D.
Affiliations
Hope College (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1970-08-21
Volume
169
Issue
3947
Pages
778-779
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2078564580
Cited by
238
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
97.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Keywords
racial attitudes, group polarization, prejudice, attitude change, high school students
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attitude, Group Processes, Prejudice, Psychology, Social, Surveys and Questionnaires, Race Relations, Social Dominance, Social Values, Sociometric Techniques, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review