The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Olfactory Reception in Invertebrates
Abstract
Recent progress in understanding the principles and mechanisms in olfaction is the result of multidisciplinary research efforts that explored chemosensation by using a variety of model organisms. Studies on invertebrates, notably nematodes, insects, and crustaceans, to which diverse experimental approaches can be applied, have greatly helped elucidate various aspects of olfactory signaling. From the converging results of genetic, molecular, and physiological studies, a common set of chemosensory mechanisms emerges. Recognition and discrimination of odorants as well as chemo-electrical transduction and processing of olfactory signals appear to be mediated by fundamentally similar mechanisms in phylogenetically diverse animals. The common challenge of organisms to decipher the world of odors was apparently met by a phylogenetically conserved strategy. Thus, comparative studies should continue to provide important contributions toward an understanding of the sense of smell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
Combinatorial Receptor Codes for Odors
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T., & Buck, L. B. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80581-4 · Cited by 2,316
Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae
Vogt, R. G., & Riddiford, L. M. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/293161a0 · Cited by 1,266
A Spatial Map of Olfactory Receptor Expression in the Drosophila Antenna
Vosshall, L. B., Amrein, H., Morozov, P. S., Rzhetsky, A., & Axel, R. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80582-6 · Cited by 1,177
A Novel Family of Divergent Seven-Transmembrane Proteins
Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G., Freeman, M. R., Lessing, D., Kim, J., & Carlson, J. R. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,155
MECHANISMS OF OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION: Converging Evidence for Common Principles Across Phyla
Hildebrand, J. G., & Shepherd, G. M. (1997) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.595 · Cited by 1,074
A zonal organization of odorant receptor gene expression in the olfactory epithelium
Ressler, K. J., Sullivan, S. L., & Buck, L. B. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90145-g · Cited by 1,066
A novel family of genes encoding putative pheromone receptors in mammals
Dulac, C., & Axel, R. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90161-2 · Cited by 1,001
Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome
Bargmann, C. I. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5396.2028 · Cited by 929
Spatial segregation of odorant receptor expression in the mammalian olfactory epithelium
Vassar, R., Ngai, J., & Axel, R. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90422-m · Cited by 883
Cited by
Transport of drugs from the nasal cavity to the central nervous system
Illum, L. (2000) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0928-0987(00)00087-7 · Cited by 907
Pugh, E. N., & Lamb, T. D. (2000) · Handbook of Biological Physics · doi:10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80008-1 · Cited by 324
Kumar, L., Brenner, N., Sledzieski, S., Olaosebikan, M., Roger, L. M., Lynn-Goin, M., Klein-Seetharaman, R., Berger, B., Putnam, H., Yang, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270965 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Krieger, J., & Breer, H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1999-10-22
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 5440
- Pages
- 720-723
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2014956379
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Olfactory Reception in Invertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.286.5440.720
- The paper
- Krieger, J., & Breer, H. (1999). Olfactory Reception in Invertebrates. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5440.720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
