The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Role for Nuclear Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Kinase in Transcriptional Control
Abstract
Phospholipase C and two inositol polyphosphate (IP) kinases constitute a signaling pathway that regulates nuclear messenger RNA export through production of inositol hexakisphosphate (IP 6 ). The inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate kinase of this pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , designated Ipk2, was found to be identical to Arg82, a regulator of the transcriptional complex ArgR-Mcm1. Synthesis of inositol 1,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate, but not IP 6 , was required for gene regulation through ArgR-Mcm1. Thus, the phospholipase C pathway produces multiple IP messengers that modulate distinct nuclear processes. The results reveal a direct mechanism by which activation of IP signaling may control gene expression.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Odom et al showed that Arg82 is an inositol phosphate kinase that converts Ins(1,4,5)P3 to Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 and that kinase activity is required for its role in transcriptional regulation (figure 5d)36.”
From Structure of Hdac3 Bound to Co-Repressor and Inositol Tetraphosphate (2012) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“This study revealed that IPK2 (yeast IPMK) enhances DNA binding of the ArgR-MCM1 complex independently of its kinase activity.”
From From Obscurity to Prominence: IPMK’s Expanding Role in Cellular Signaling, Physiology, and Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“However, the transcriptional function of this complex is regulated by InsP4 and InsP5, which are products of IPK2’s kinase activity.”
From From Obscurity to Prominence: IPMK’s Expanding Role in Cellular Signaling, Physiology, and Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“The York group demonstrated that InsP4 (Ins 1, 4, 5, 6) is crucial for activating the ArgR-MCM1 transcription factor in yeast [73], which regulates genes involved in cell cycle, cell type specificity, and responses to pheromones and nutrients.”
From From Obscurity to Prominence: IPMK’s Expanding Role in Cellular Signaling, Physiology, and Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cites
Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling
Berridge, M. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361315a0 · Cited by 6,545
The MADS-Box Family of Transcription Factors
Shore, P., & Sharrocks, A. D. (1995) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0001l.x · Cited by 921
The MADS-Box Family of Transcription Factors
Shore, P., & Sharrocks, A. D. (1995) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20430.x · Cited by 702
York, J. D., John, A. R. O., Murphy, R., Ives, E. B., & Wente, S. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5424.96 · Cited by 547
Self-citationSaiardi, A., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Snowman, A. M., Tempst, P., & Snyder, S. H. (1999) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)80055-x · Cited by 414
INOSITOL PHOSPHATE BIOCHEMISTRY
Majerus, P. W. (1992) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.001301 · Cited by 397
Boronenkov, I. V., Loijens, J. C., Umeda, M., & Anderson, R. A. (1998) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.9.12.3547 · Cited by 337
Nuclear localization and signalling activity of phosphoinositidase Cβ in Swiss 3T3 cells
Martelli, A. M., Gilmour, R., Bertagnolo, V., Neri, L. M., Manzoli, L., & Cocco, L. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358242a0 · Cited by 322
The yeast cell-type-specific repressor α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein
Keleher, C. A., Goutte, C., & Johnson, A. D. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(88)90449-7 · Cited by 314
Significance of PIP2 hydrolysis and regulation of phospholipase C isozymes
Lee, S. B., & Rhee, S. G. (1995) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/0955-0674(95)80026-3 · Cited by 284
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Messenguy F., Dubois E., Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2586 (1993).
- Flick J., Thorner J., Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5861 (1993);
- Payne W. E., Fitzgerald-Hayes M., Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 4351 (1993).
- Dubois E., Messenguy F., Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2162 (1991).
- Seneca S., Punyammalee B., Glansdorff N., Crabeel M., Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 68 (1992).
- Supplementary material is available to Science Online subscribers at www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/1045815.shl.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phosphoinositides: Tiny Lipids With Giant Impact on Cell Regulation
Balla, T. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2012 · Cited by 1,638
Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control
West, S. C. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1127 · Cited by 977
Signal Transduction Cascades Regulating Fungal Development and Virulence
Lengeler, K. B., Davidson, R. C., D'souza, C., Harashima, T., Shen, W.-C., Wang, P., Pan, X., Waugh, M., & Heitman, J. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.746-785.2000 · Cited by 915
Back in the Water: The Return of the Inositol Phosphates
Irvine, R. F., & Schell, M. J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35073015 · Cited by 659
Auxin Receptors and Plant Development: A New Signaling Paradigm
Mockaitis, K., & Estelle, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123214 · Cited by 651
Metadata
- Authors
- Odom, A. R., Stahlberg, A., Wente, S. R., & York, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3813, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- York, John D.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-03-17
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 5460
- Pages
- 2026-2029
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2087358641
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- phytic acid, mRNA export, transcriptional regulation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Arginine, Cell Nucleus, DNA-Binding Proteins, Inositol Phosphates, Molecular Sequence Data, Type C Phospholipases, Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases, Phosphorylation, Phytic Acid, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), Minichromosome Maintenance 1 Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
