Cited by 71Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neurons in Monkey Prefrontal Cortex That Track Past or Predict Future Performance

Hasegawa, Ryohei P., Blitz, Ari M., Geller, Nancy L., Goldberg, Michael E.·2000·Science

Abstract

Although frontal cortex is thought to be important in controlling behavior across long periods of time, most studies of this area concentrate on neuronal responses instantaneously relevant to the current task. In order to investigate the relationship of frontal activity to behavior over longer time periods, we trained rhesus monkeys on a difficult oculomotor task. Their performance fluctuated during the day, and the activity of prefrontal neurons, even measured while the monkeys waited for the targets to appear at the beginning of each set of trials, correlated with performance in a probabilistic rather than a determinist manner: neurons reflected past or predicted future performance, much more than they reflected current performance. We suggest that this activity is related to processes such as arousal or motivation that set the tone for behavior rather than controlling it on a millisecond basis, and could result from ascending pathways that utilize slow, second-messenger synaptic processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.290.5497.1786

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During arousal, there is a significant temporary boost in the capacity to respond to stimuli, indicative of phasic alertness, which is manifested by improved performance on a number of visual and memory tasks.

    “Previous findings demonstrated that during arousal, there is a significant temporary boost in the capacity to respond to stimuli, indicative of phasic alertness, which is manifested by improved performance on a number of visual and memory tasks [59–61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasegawa, R. P., Blitz, A. M., Geller, N. L., & Goldberg, M. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hasegawa, Ryohei P.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-12
Volume
290
Issue
5497
Pages
1786-1789
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2014187604
Cited by
71
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, oculomotor tasks, rhesus monkeys, neuronal activity, performance prediction, probabilistic forecasting, arousal, motivation, ascending pathways
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cues, Forecasting, Learning, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Neuropsychological Tests, Probability, Psychomotor Performance, Second Messenger Systems, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review