Cited by 249Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationNeural dynamics and brain function

Activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex reflects multiple steps of future events in action plans

Open access
Mushiake, Hajime, Saito, Naohiro, Sakamoto, Kazuhiro, Itoyama, Yasuto, Tanji, Jun·2006·Neuron

Abstract

To achieve a behavioral goal in a complex environment, we must plan multiple steps of motor behavior. On planning a series of actions, we anticipate future events that will occur as a result of each action and mentally organize the temporal sequence of events. To investigate the involvement of the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) in such multistep planning, we examined neuronal activity in the PFC of monkeys performing a maze task that required the planning of stepwise cursor movements to reach a goal. During the preparatory period, PFC neurons reflected each of all forthcoming cursor movements, rather than arm movements. In contrast, in the primary motor cortex, most neuronal activity reflected arm movements but little of cursor movements during the preparatory period, as well as during movement execution. Our data suggest that the PFC is involved primarily in planning multiple future events that occur as a consequence of behavioral actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.045

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hippocampal-prefrontal interaction has been suggested to allow rapid, subconscious evaluation of potential action sequences during decision-making, with the hippocampus simulating expected outcomes of potential actions generated and evaluated in the prefrontal.

    “Hippocampal-prefrontal interaction has been suggested to allow rapid, subconscious evaluation of potential action sequences during decision-making, with the hippocampus in effect simulating the expected outcomes of potential actions that are generated and evaluated in the prefrontal (Mushiake et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2015).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Mushiake et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mushiake, H., Saito, N., Sakamoto, K., Itoyama, Y., & Tanji, J.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Tamagawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Mushiake, Hajime
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
631-641
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169035993
Cited by
249
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
lateral prefrontal cortex, action planning, primary motor cortex, neuronal activity, cursor movement, goal-directed behavior, preparatory period
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Electrodes, Implanted, Eye Movements, Learning, Macaca, Motor Skills, Neurons, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review