Cited by 546Quantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systems

Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions

Open access
Bohnet, Justin G., Sawyer, Brian C., Britton, Joseph W., Wall, Michael L., Rey, Ana Maria, Foss-Feig, Michael, Bollinger, John J.·2016·Science

Abstract

Hundreds of ions simulate magnetism: Strongly interacting quantum systems present a challenge to computational methods even at a relatively low particle number of a few dozen. Researchers are looking to tackle such problems by simulating them in a well-understood and controllable system. A linear array of ions is one such system; however, assembling a large enough number of ions is tricky. Bohnet et al. show that a two-dimensional “crystal” of around 200 9 Be + ions held together by magnetic and electric fields in a so-called Penning trap can simulate quantum magnetism. The work sets the stage for simulations with more complicated forms of interaction that classical computers would find intractable. Science , this issue p. 1297

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aad9958

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum simulations and quantum control have been demonstrated in crystals of more than 100 ions in Penning traps.

    “whereas quantum simulations and quantum control have been demonstrated in crystals of more than 100 ions29–31.”

    From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohnet, J. G., Sawyer, B. C., Britton, J. W., Wall, M. L., Rey, A. M., Foss-Feig, M., & Bollinger, J. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics (US)
  • JILA, NIST, and Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
  • Army Research Lab, Adelphi, MD 20783, USA.
Corresponding author
  • Bohnet, Justin G.
  • Bollinger, John J.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-06-10
Volume
352
Issue
6291
Pages
1297-1301
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2193360187
Cited by
546
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 19
FWCI
48.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • NSF (PHY 1521080)
  • JILA-NSF (PFC-1125844)
  • Army Research Office
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • National Research Council Research Associateship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
trapped ions, quantum spin dynamics, entanglement generation, spin squeezing, non-Gaussian statistics, transverse-field Ising model, Penning trap, 9Be+ ions, quantum simulation, decoherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review