The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of bacterial persistence during stress and antibiotic exposure
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The escalating crisis of multidrug resistance is raising fears of untreatable infections caused by bacterial “superbugs.” However, many patients already suffer from infections that are effectively untreatable due to innate bacterial mechanisms for persistence. This phenomenon is caused by the formation of specialized persister cells that evade antibiotic killing and other stresses by entering a physiologically dormant state, irrespective of whether they possess genes enabling antibiotic resistance. The recalcitrance of persister cells is a major cause of prolonged and recurrent courses of infection that can eventually lead to complete antibiotic treatment failure. Regularly growing bacteria differentiate into persister cells stochastically at a basal rate, but this phenotypic conversion can also be induced by environmental cues indicative of imminent threats for the bacteria. Size and composition of the persister subpopulation in bacterial communities are largely controlled by stress signaling pathways, such as the general stress response or the SOS response, in conjunction with the second messenger (p)ppGpp that is almost always involved in persister formation. Consequently, persister formation is stimulated under conditions that favor the activation of these signaling pathways. Such conditions include bacterial biofilms and hostile host environments, as well as response to damage caused by sublethal concentrations of antibiotics. ADVANCES: The limited comprehensive understanding of persister formation and survival is a critical issue in controlling persistent infections. However, recent work in the field has uncovered the molecular architecture of several cellular pathways underlying bacterial persistence, as well as the functional interactions that generate heterogeneous populations of persister cells. These results confirm the long-standing notion that persistence is intimately connected to slow growth or dormancy in the sense that a certain level of physiological quiescence is attained. Most prominently, the central role of toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules has been explained in considerable detail. In the model organism Escherichia coli K-12, two major pathways of persister formation via TA modules are both controlled by (p)ppGpp and involve toxin HokB and a panel of mRNA endonuclease toxins, respectively. Whereas activation of the membrane-associated toxin HokB depends on the enigmatic (GTPase) guanosine triphosphatase Obg and causes persister formation by abolishing the proton-motive force, mRNA endonuclease toxins are activated through antitoxin degradation by protease Lon and globally inhibit translation. In addition to these two pathways, toxin TisB is activated in response to DNA damage by the SOS response and promotes persister formation in a manner similar to HokB. Beyond TA modules, many additional factors (such as cellular energy metabolism or drug efflux) have been found to contribute to persister formation and survival, but their position in particular molecular pathways is often unclear. Altogether, this diversity of mechanisms drives the formation of a highly heterogeneous ensemble of persister cells that displays multistress and multidrug tolerance as the root of the recalcitrance of persistent infections. OUTLOOK: Though recent advances in the field have greatly expanded our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying persister formation, important facets have remained elusive and should be addressed in future studies. One example is the upstream signaling input into the pathways mediating bacterial persister formation (e.g., the nature of the pacemaker driving stochastic persister formation). Similarly, it is often not well understood how—beyond the general idea of dormancy—persister cells can survive the action of lethal antibiotics. Finally, one curious aspect of the persister field is recurrent inconsistency between the results obtained by different groups. We speculate that these variations may be linked to subtle differences in experimental procedures inducing separate yet partially redundant pathways of persister formation. It is evident that the elucidation of this phenomenon may not only consolidate progress in the field but also offer the chance to gain insights into the molecular basis and control of bacterial persistence. Bacterial persisters defy antibiotic treatment.: Persister cells are phenotypic variants of regularly growing bacteria and survive lethal antibiotic treatment in a nongrowing, dormant state. Upon termination of treatment, the resuscitation of persister cells can replenish the population. Our Review focuses on the diverse molecular mechanisms that underlie bacterial persister formation and drive the heterogeneity of these cells. PMF, proton-motive force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L., & Leibler, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099390 · Cited by 2,952
Lewis, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 · Cited by 1,858
Fauvart, M., De Groote, V. N., & Michiels, J. (2011) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.030932-0 · Cited by 425
Identity and function of a large gene network underlying mutagenic repair of DNA breaks
Al Mamun, A. A. M., Lombardo, M.-J., Shee, C., Lisewski, A. M., Gonzalez, C., Lin, D., Nehring, R. B., Saint-Ruf, C., Gibson, J. L., Frisch, R. L., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226683 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells
Fisher, R. A., Gollan, B., & Helaine, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42 · Cited by 1,243
Ali, A., Shah, T., Ullah, R., Zhou, P., Guo, M., Ovais, M., Tan, Z., & Rui, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.629054 · Cited by 650
Anti-tuberculosis treatment strategies and drug development: challenges and priorities
Dartois, V. A., & Rubin, E. J. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00731-y · Cited by 490
Windels, E. M., Michiels, J. E., Fauvart, M., Wenseleers, T., Van den Bergh, B., & Michiels, J. (2019) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0344-9 · Cited by 367
Molecular Basis of Stationary Phase Survival and Applications
Jaishankar, J., & Srivastava, P. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02000 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Harms, A., Maisonneuve, E., & Gerdes, K.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2016-12-16
- Volume
- 354
- Issue
- 6318
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2562944419
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 58.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of bacterial persistence during stress and antibiotic exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aaf4268
- The paper
- Harms, A., Maisonneuve, E., & Gerdes, K. (2016). Mechanisms of bacterial persistence during stress and antibiotic exposure. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.