Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes

Open access
Balzarotti, Francisco, Eilers, Yvan, Gwosch, Klaus C., Gynnå, Arvid H., Westphal, Volker, Stefani, Fernando D., Elf, Johan, Hell, Stefan W.·2017·Science

Abstract

Superresolution imaging in sharper focus: An optical microscope cannot distinguish objects separated by less than half the wavelength of light. Superresolution techniques have broken this “diffraction limit” and provided exciting new insights into cell biology. Still, such techniques hit a limit at a resolution of about 10 nm. Balzarotti et al. describe another way of localizing single molecules called MINFLUX (see the Perspective by Xiao and Ha). As in photoactivated localization microscopy and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, fluorophores are stochastically switched on and off, but the emitter is located using an excitation beam that is doughnut-shaped, as in stimulated emission depletion. Finding the point where emission is minimal reduces the number of photons needed to localize an emitter. MINFLUX attained ∼1-nanometer precision, and, in single-particle tracking, achieved a 100-fold enhancement in temporal resolution. Science , this issue p. 606 ; see also p. 582

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aak9913

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Balzarotti, F., Eilers, Y., Gwosch, K. C., Gynnå, A. H., Westphal, V., Stefani, F. D., Elf, J., & Hell, S. W.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-02-10
Volume
355
Issue
6325
Pages
606-612
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2554260837
Cited by
1,225
References
0
FWCI
47.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.