Cited by 1,065Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsRenal and related cancersAcute Kidney Injury Research

Single-cell transcriptomics of the mouse kidney reveals potential cellular targets of kidney disease

Open access
Park, Jihwan, Shrestha, Rojesh, Qiu, Chengxiang, Kondo, Ayano, Huang, Shizheng, Werth, Max, Li, Mingyao, Barasch, Jonathan +1 more·2018·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Touring the kidney, cell by cell: Our kidneys play a critical role in keeping us healthy, a fact of which we are reminded several times each day. This organ's cellular complexity has hindered progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying chronic kidney disease, which affects 10% of the world's population. Using single-cell transcriptional profiling, Park et al. produced a comprehensive cell atlas of the healthy mouse kidney (see the Perspective by Humphreys). An unexpected cell type in the collecting duct appears to be a transitional state between two known cell types. The transition from one cell type to the other is regulated by the Notch signaling pathway and is associated with metabolic acidosis. The authors also find that genetically distinct kidney diseases with common clinical features share common cellular origins. Science , this issue p. 758 ; see also p. 709

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aar2131

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manual validation of cell type annotation was performed and was consistent with previous studies.

    “After classification, we performed a manual validation of cell type annotation consistent with previous studies (Supplemental Methods; Park et al. 2018; The Tabula Muris Consortium 2018; Angelidis et al. 2019).”
  • The recovered cell-type proportions differ from the Tabula Muris but are not outside expected ranges based on previous comparisons between scRNA-seq data sets.

    “The cell-type proportions that we recovered differ from the Tabula Muris (e.g., we recovered comparatively more immune cells in the kidney and lung), but are not outside expected ranges based on previous comparisons between scRNA-seq data sets (Park et al. 2018; The Tabula Muris Consortium 2018).”

    From Murine single-cell RNA-seq reveals cell-identity- and tissue-specific trajectories of aging (2019) · cites this paper as Park et al. 2018

    In “Single cell profiling and unbiased clustering of mouse kidney cells” (page unavailable), Park et al. report that analyzing fewer cells increases uncertainty and can lose rare cell types. Our copy does not compare cell-type proportions across scRNA-seq datasets or establish an expected range for differences from Tabula Muris (searched: proportions, cross-dataset comparisons, expected ranges). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dock4 is expressed in mouse kidney proximal tubule cells and distal convoluted tubule cells.

    “DOCK4 is expressed in kidney in GTEx v8, and Dock4 is expressed in mouse kidney proximal tubule cells and distal convoluted tubule cells.”

    From Multi-trait association studies discover pleiotropic loci between Alzheimer’s disease and cardiometabolic traits (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

    The ‘Classification of kidney cells based on cell-type specific marker genes’ section identifies proximal tubule and distal convoluted tubule cells, but does not mention Dock4. Searches for Dock4 and its expression in those cell types found no passage in our copy establishing the claimed expression pattern. The GTEx statement is not the part attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DOCK4 is expressed in kidney in GTEx v8.

    “DOCK4 is expressed in kidney in GTEx v8, and Dock4 is expressed in mouse kidney proximal tubule cells and distal convoluted tubule cells.”

    From Multi-trait association studies discover pleiotropic loci between Alzheimer’s disease and cardiometabolic traits (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

    The passages on kidney cell-type expression (Classification of kidney cells and Mendelian disease genes show cell-type specificity; page unavailable) do not mention DOCK4 or GTEx v8. Searches for DOCK4, GTEx v8, and the specified kidney cell types found no passage addressing DOCK4 expression in human kidney in GTEx v8. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Kriz W, Bankir L, A standard nomenclature for structures of the kidney. The Renal Commission of the International Union of Physiological Sciences (IUPS). Kidney international 33, 1– 7 (1988). 3352156
  2. [2]Macosko EZ, Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets. Cell 161, 1202– 1214 (2015). 26000488 PMC4481139
  3. [5]Stubbington MJT, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A, Teichmann SA, Single-cell transcriptomics to explore the immune system in health and disease. Science 358, 58– 63 (2017). 28983043 PMC5654495
  4. [7]Chen L, Transcriptomes of major renal collecting duct cell types in mouse identified by single-cell RNA-seq. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E9989– E9998 (2017). 29089413 PMC5699061
  5. [8]Karaiskos N, The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution. Science, (2017). 28860209
  6. [9]Cao J, Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661– 667 (2017). 28818938 PMC5894354
  7. [10]Hildebrandt F, Genetic kidney diseases. Lancet 375, 1287– 1295 (2010). 20382325 PMC2898711
  8. [11]Menezes LF, Germino GG, Systems biology of polycystic kidney disease: a critical review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 7, 39– 52 (2015). 25641951 PMC4339620
  9. [12]Kang HM, Defective fatty acid oxidation in renal tubular epithelial cells has a key role in kidney fibrosis development. Nat Med 21, 37– 46 (2015). 25419705 PMC4444078
  10. [13]Lee JW, Chou CL, Knepper MA, Deep Sequencing in Microdissected Renal Tubules Identifies Nephron Segment-Specific Transcriptomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 26, 2669– 2677 (2015). 25817355 PMC4625681
  11. [14]Chang-Panesso M, Humphreys BD, Cellular plasticity in kidney injury and repair. Nature reviews. Nephrology 13, 39– 46 (2017). 27890924
  12. [15]Werth M, Transcription factor TFCP2L1 patterns cells in the mouse kidney collecting ducts. eLife 6, (2017). PMC5484618 28577314
  13. [16]Wu H, Aqp2-expressing cells give rise to renal intercalated cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 24, 243– 252 (2013). 23308014 PMC3559490
  14. [17]Jeong HW, Inactivation of Notch signaling in the renal collecting duct causes nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation 119, 3290– 3300 (2009). 19855135 PMC2769200
  15. [18]Li J, Collecting duct-derived cells display mesenchymal stem cell properties and retain selective in vitro and in vivo epithelial capacity. J Am Soc Nephrol 26, 81– 94 (2015). 24904087 PMC4279727
  16. [19]Schwartz GJ, Barasch J, Al-Awqati Q, Plasticity of functional epithelial polarity. Nature 318, 368– 371 (1985). 2415824
  17. [21]Malaga-Dieguez L, Susztak K, ADCK4 “reenergizes” nephrotic syndrome. The Journal of clinical investigation 123, 4996– 4999 (2013). 24270414 PMC3859427
  18. [22]Pattaro C, Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function. Nature communications 7, 10023 (2016). PMC4735748 26831199
  19. [23]Warren HR, Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. Nature genetics 49, 403– 415 (2017). 28135244 PMC5972004
  20. [24]Shin SY, An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites. Nature genetics 46, 543– 550 (2014). 24816252 PMC4064254
  21. [25]Welling PA, Roles and Regulation of Renal K Channels. Annual review of physiology 78, 415– 435 (2016). 26654186
  22. [26]Bielesz B, Epithelial Notch signaling regulates interstitial fibrosis development in the kidneys of mice and humans. The Journal of clinical investigation 120, 4040– 4054 (2010). 20978353 PMC2964979
  23. [27]Sweetwyne MT, Notch1 and Notch2 in Podocytes Play Differential Roles During Diabetic Nephropathy Development. Diabetes 64, 4099– 4111 (2015). 26293507 PMC4657584
  24. [28]Lu Y, Ye Y, Yang Q, Shi S, Single-cell RNA-sequence analysis of mouse glomerular mesangial cells uncovers mesangial cell essential genes. Kidney international 92, 504– 513 (2017). 28320530
  25. [29]Adam M, Potter AS, Potter SS, Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single-cell RNA-seq artifacts: a molecular atlas of kidney development. Development 144, 3625– 3632 (2017). 28851704 PMC5665481
  26. [30]Der E, Single cell RNA sequencing to dissect the molecular heterogeneity in lupus nephritis. JCI insight 2, (2017). PMC5414553 28469080
  27. [31]Welling PA, Regulation of renal potassium secretion: molecular mechanisms. Seminars in nephrology 33, 215– 228 (2013). 23953799

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, J., Shrestha, R., Qiu, C., Kondo, A., Huang, S., Werth, M., Li, M., Barasch, J., & Suszták, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Suszták, Katalin
Venue
Science
Published
2018-05-18
Volume
360
Issue
6390
Pages
758-763
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2795687816
Cited by
1,065
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 1
FWCI
42.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP3 DK108220, DK105821)
  • American Diabetes Association (1-17-PDF-036)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK076077, DK087635)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Renal and related cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
kidney cell types, kidney disease pathogenesis, collecting duct, intercalated cells, principal cells, Notch signaling, cell fate transitions, metabolic acidosis, hereditary kidney disease, lineage tracing, cell trajectory analysis, mouse kidney
MeSH terms
Cell Plasticity, Animals, Genetic Markers, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Kidney Tubules, Collecting, Signal Transduction, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Receptors, Notch, Cell Tracking, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review