Cited by 191Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Hierarchical reasoning by neural circuits in the frontal cortex

Open access
Sarafyazd, Morteza, Jazayeri, Mehrdad·2019·Science

Abstract

Humans process information hierarchically. In the presence of hierarchies, sources of failures are ambiguous. Humans resolve this ambiguity by assessing their confidence after one or more attempts. To understand the neural basis of this reasoning strategy, we recorded from dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) of monkeys in a task in which negative outcomes were caused either by misjudging the stimulus or by a covert switch between two stimulus-response contingency rules. We found that both areas harbored a representation of evidence supporting a rule switch. Additional perturbation experiments revealed that ACC functioned downstream of DMFC and was directly and specifically involved in inferring covert rule switches. These results‏ reveal the computational principles of hierarchical reasoning, as implemented by cortical circuits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aav8911

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurons in monkey pMFC integrate information about previous trials and drive decisions about whether to switch strategy.

    “Neurons in monkey pMFC were found to integrate information about previous trials and drive decisions about whether to switch strategy (Sarafyazd & Jazayeri 2019).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Sarafyazd & Jazayeri 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarafyazd, M., & Jazayeri, M.
Affiliations
McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
364
Issue
6441
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2946688411
Cited by
191
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
  • Simons Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
hierarchical reasoning, dorsomedial frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, rule switching, ambiguity resolution, confidence estimation, neural circuits, perturbation experiments
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca mulatta, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review