Cited by 854Forest Management and PolicyPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFire effects on ecosystems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests

Abstract

Risks to mitigation potential of forests: Much recent attention has focused on the potential of trees and forests to mitigate ongoing climate change by acting as sinks for carbon. Anderegg et al. review the growing evidence that forests' climate mitigation potential is increasingly at risk from a range of adversities that limit forest growth and health. These include physical factors such as drought and fire and biotic factors, including the depredations of insect herbivores and fungal pathogens. Full assessment and quantification of these risks, which themselves are influenced by climate, is key to achieving science-based policy outcomes for effective land and forest management. Science , this issue p. eaaz7005

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaz7005

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 129 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. G. Simonet A. B. Bos A. E. Duchelle I. A. P. Resosudarmo J. Subervie S. Wunder in Transforming REDD+: Lessons and New Directions A. Angelsen Ed. (Center for International Forestry Research 2018) pp. 117–130.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 853

Metadata

Authors
Anderegg, W. R. L., Trugman, A. T., Badgley, G., Anderson, C. M., Bartuska, A., Ciais, P., Cullenward, D., Field, C. B., Freeman, J., Goetz, S. J., Hicke, J. A., Huntzinger, D., Jackson, R. B., Nickerson, J., Pacala, S., & Randerson, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • World Wildlife Fund (US)
  • Resources For The Future (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • CarbonPlan, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • Climate Action Reserve, Los Angeles, CA 90017, USA.
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Anderegg, William R. L.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
368
Issue
6497
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3035911052
Cited by
854
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 152 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 15
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation (NA)
  • United States Department of Agriculture (2018-67019-27850, 2018-67012-28020)
  • US National Science Foundation (1714972, 1802880, DMS-1520873)
  • NASA Earth Ventures (NNL15AA03C)
  • NASA Applied Sciences (NNX17AG51G)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
forest carbon sink, forest stability, natural climate solutions, forest carbon sequestration, forest fires, drought, biotic disturbance, vegetation modeling, remote sensing of forests, climate change mitigation
MeSH terms
Fires, Policy Making, Droughts, Climate Change, Carbon Sequestration, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review