The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 8 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Robust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Although deep learning has revolutionized protein structure prediction, almost all experimentally characterized de novo protein designs have been generated using physically based approaches such as Rosetta. Here, we describe a deep learning–based protein sequence design method, ProteinMPNN, that has outstanding performance in both in silico and experimental tests. On native protein backbones, ProteinMPNN has a sequence recovery of 52.4% compared with 32.9% for Rosetta. The amino acid sequence at different positions can be coupled between single or multiple chains, enabling application to a wide range of current protein design challenges. We demonstrate the broad utility and high accuracy of ProteinMPNN using x-ray crystallography, cryo–electron microscopy, and functional studies by rescuing previously failed designs, which were made using Rosetta or AlphaFold, of protein monomers, cyclic homo-oligomers, tetrahedral nanoparticles, and target-binding proteins.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
ProteinMPNN is a deep learning–based protein sequence design method that uses a message-passing neural network with order-agnostic decoding and symmetry-aware coupling to design sequences for monomers, oligomers, nanoparticles, and interfaces. It achieves higher native sequence recovery than Rosetta and rescues previously failed experimental designs across multiple protein design challenges.
Key findings
- On native protein backbones, ProteinMPNN achieved 52.4% sequence recovery versus 32.9% for Rosetta, while requiring only 1.2 seconds versus 4.3 minutes for a 100-residue protein.
- Median sequence recovery was 52% for monomers, 55% for homomers, and 51% for heteromers; recovery ranged from 90–95% in the deep core to 35% on the surface.
- Training with backbone noise improved robustness: a model trained with 0.3 Å noise generated 2–3 times more sequences with AlphaFold predictions within lDDT-Ca of 95.0 and 90.0 of the true structures than unnoised or slightly noised models.
- Experimental rescue of AlphaFold-generated designs: of 96 designs produced in E. coli, 73 were soluble (median soluble yield 247 mg/L vs. 9 mg/L for AF sequences) and 50 had the target monomeric or oligomeric state; for C5/C6 cyclic oligomers, ProteinMPNN designs were 88% soluble with 27.7% correct oligomeric state versus 40% soluble and none correct for Rosetta designs.
Methods
- ProteinMPNN is based on a message-passing neural network with 3 encoder and 3 decoder layers and 128 hidden dimensions, using backbone features including Ca-Ca distances, relative frame orientations, dihedral angles, and added N, Ca, C, O, and virtual Cb distances; edge updates and order-agnostic autoregressive decoding were introduced.
- Training used protein assemblies from the PDB (as of Aug 02, 2021) determined by X-ray crystallography or cryoEM to better than 3.5 Å resolution and with fewer than 10,000 residues, clustered at 30% sequence identity with mmseqs2, yielding 25,361 clusters; monomer training/validation used 19.7k high-resolution single-chain structures split by CATH.
- Evaluation included in silico test sets of 402 monomer backbones for Rosetta comparison and 690 monomers, 732 homomers (<2000 residues), and 98 heteromers, plus experimental characterization by E. coli expression, SEC, SEC-MALS, X-ray crystallography, cryoEM, and biolayer interferometry.
Limitations
- The paper states that in silico metrics such as native sequence recovery are sensitive to crystallographic resolution and may not correlate with proper folding; even a single residue substitution can block folding.
- The paper notes that deep learning methods lack the physical transparency of methods like Rosetta.
- The text does not include a dedicated limitations section; evident from the text, experimental validation covers selected design challenges and backbones, and not all designed sequences were structurally characterized.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that the AF generated sequences were mostly insoluble (median soluble yield: 9 mg per liter of culture equivalent Figure 3A).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This resulted in a sequence recovery increase from 41.2% (baseline model) to 49.0% (experiment 1), see Table 1 below”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Combining additional input features and edge updates leads to a sequence recovery of 50.5% (experiment 3).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although requiring only a small fraction of the compute time (1.2 seconds versus 4.3 minutes for 100 residues)”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“ProteinMPNN solves sequence design problems in a small fraction of the time (1.2 sec vs 258.8 sec on a single CPU for a 100 residue protein) required for physically based approaches such as Rosetta”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“found that performance saturated at 32–48 neighbors.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“sequences encoded by noised ProteinMPNN models are more accurately decoded into 3D coordinates by AlphaFold”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Training with backbone noise improves model performance for protein design
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with improvements across the full range of residue burial from protein core to surface”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a model trained with 0.3Å noise generated 2–3 times more sequences with AlphaFold predictions within lDDT-Ca (14) of 95.0 and 90.0 of the true structures than unnoised or slightly noised models (Figure 2C).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Training with backbone noise improves model performance for protein design
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The accuracy was particularly high in the central core of the structure, with sidechains predicted using AlphaFold from the ProteinMPNN sequence fitting nearly perfectly into the electron density (Figure 3D).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the strength of the single sequence to structure mapping, as assessed by AlphaFold, was higher for models trained with additional backbone noise.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Training with backbone noise improves model performance for protein design
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
- Probably not a substantial claim. 3
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Machine learning sequence design approaches have been developed previously (1–6, 6a), notably the previously described message passing method on which ProteinMPNN is based, but have focused on the monomer design problem, achieve lower native sequence recoveries, and with the exception of a TIM barrel design study (6) have not been extensively validated using crystallography and cryoEM to evaluate”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1–6, 6a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [6] Anand N, Eguchi R, Mathews II, Perez CP, Derry A, Altman RB, & Huang PS (2022). Protein sequence design with a learned potential. Nature communications, 13(1), 1– 11. PMC8826426 35136054 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas only a small fraction of the original Rosetta designed sequences were predicted to fold to the design target structures, following ProteinMPNN redesign the majority were confidently predicted to fold to close to the design target structures (Figure 2F).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Training with backbone noise improves model performance for protein design
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“unconstrained design without symmetry, averaged probabilities, and averaged logits resulted in 52%, 53%, and 55% median sequence recoveries respectively (Figure S1C).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The median overall sequences recoveries were 52% for monomers, 55% for homomers, and 51% for heteromers (Figure 2B).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the proteins were highly thermo-stable, with secondary structure being maintained up to 95 °C (Figure 3B).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The alpha-beta protein structure contains 5 beta strands and 4 alpha helices, and is close to the design target backbone (2.35 Å over 130 residues)”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“of 96 designs produced in E. coli, 73 were expressed solubly (median soluble yield: 247 mg per liter of culture equivalent, Figure 3A) and 50 had the target monomeric or oligomeric state as assessed by SEC (Figure 3A,C).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“training models on backbones to which Gaussian noise (std=0.02Å) had been added improved sequence recovery on confident protein structure models generated by AlphaFold (average pLDDT>80.0) from UniRef50, while the sequence recovery on unperturbed PDB structures decreased as expected (Table 1).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Training with backbone noise improves model performance for protein design
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Biolayer interferometry experiments showed strong binding to the Grb2 SH3 domain (Figure 4B), with considerably higher signal than the free proline rich peptide; point mutations predicted to disrupt the design completely eliminated the binding signal.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
In the paper
“ProteinMPNN designs also have a much higher propensity to crystallize, greatly facilitating structure determination of designed proteins.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wicky et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the Rosetta designed set, 40% were soluble and none had the correct oligomeric state confirmed by SEC-MALS. For the ProteinMPNN designed set, 88% were soluble and 27.7% had the correct oligomeric state.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Experimental evaluation of ProteinMPNN
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they are trained directly to find the most probable amino acid for a protein backbone given all the examples in the PDB, and hence such ambiguities do not arise, making sequence design more robust and less dependent on the judgement of a human expert.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In traditional physically based approaches, sequence design maps to the problem of identifying an amino acid sequence whose lowest energy state is the desired structure.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the methods described thus far are limited in their applicability to the wide range of current protein design challenges, and have not been extensively validated experimentally.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1–6, 6a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Recently deep learning approaches have shown considerable promise in rapidly generating plausible amino acid sequences given monomeric protein backbones without need for compute intensive explicit consideration of sidechain rotameric states (1–6, 6a).”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1–6, 6a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“AlphaFold (9) and RoseTTAfold (13) produce remarkably good structure predictions for native proteins given multiple sequence alignments which can contain substantial co-evolutionary and other information reflecting aspects of the 3D structure, but generally produce much poorer structures when provided only with a single sequence.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Training with backbone noise improves model performance for protein design
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Uria B, Murray I, & Larochelle H (2014, January). A deep and tractable density estimator. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 467– 475). PMLR. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] Leman JK, Weitzner BD, Lewis SM, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Alam N, Alford RF, … & Bonneau R (2020). Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nature methods, 17(7), 665– 680. PMC7603796 32483333 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“locally connected graph neural networks can be used to model the structure to sequence mapping problem because protein backbones provide a notion of local neighborhoods which primarily determine sequence identities.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is, however, computationally intractable as it requires computing energies over all possible structures, including unwanted oligomeric and aggregated states”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ProteinMPNN requires no expert customization for specific design challenges, and it should thus make protein design more broadly accessible.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In silico metrics such as native sequence recovery are very sensitive to crystallographic resolution (Figure S3 B, C) and may not correlate with proper folding”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“instead Rosetta and other approaches as a proxy carry out a search for the lowest energy sequence for a given backbone structure, and structure prediction calculations are required in a second step to confirm that there are no other structures in which the sequence has still lower energy.”
§ Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Evolution in most cases does not optimize for stability.
“as evolution in most cases does not optimize for stability”
The paper relies on this without support.
The backbones of previously failed designs are correct and designable targets, so failure was due to the sequence.
“we kept the backbones of the original designs fixed but discarded the original sequences and generated new ones using ProteinMPNN.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second, protein design models have shown that new folds can be successfully predicted beyond the structural landscape explored by nature.249”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [249]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
CATH citation points to the wrong reference
MinorThe text cites reference 7 for CATH, but the CATH paper is listed as reference 8. Reference 7 is a different paper.
“the PDB split based on the CATH (7) protein classification”
“8. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, & Thornton JM (1997). CATH–a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.”
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Coot : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571
PHENIX : a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Davis, I. W., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Kapral, G. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909052925 · Cited by 23,716
Phaser crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612
Kabsch, W. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444909047337 · Cited by 16,463
Overview of the CCP 4 suite and current developments
Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan, K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., Keegan, R. M., Krissinel, E. B., Leslie, A. G. W., McCoy, A., et al. (2011) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910045749 · Cited by 12,353
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,201–1,300 of 2,091
Generative steering to adapt proteins beyond native biological contextsPreprint
Zhang, X., Lu, W. S., Viggiano, B., Reynolds, K., Burick, S., Sotillo, E., Dai, H., Lee, G., Liu, Z., Yang, N., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.11.664238 · Cited by 2
A Paired Database of Predicted and Experimental Protein Peptide Binding Information
Torres, J. A., Kieslich, C. A., & Pantazes, R. J. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05754-7 · Cited by 2
WAChRs are excitatory opsins sensitive to indoor lightingPreprint
Tose, A. J., Nava, A. A., McGrath, S. N., Mardinly, A. R., & Naka, A. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.12.675947 · Cited by 2
RemoteFoldSet: Benchmarking Structural Awareness of Protein Language ModelsPreprint
Ma, Z., & Bethel, N. P. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.23.678152 · Cited by 2
Self-citationImproved De Novo Peptide Binder Design with Target-Conditioned Inverse FoldingPreprint
Layne, E., Kanawaty, A. K., Broom, A., Kitaygorodsky, A., Nivedha, A. K., Vora, P., Woffindale, C., Hailstone, S., Sachouli, E., Halcrow, E., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.28.685072 · Cited by 2
Marston, D. J., Watanabe, A., Kapingidza, A. B., Harris, C., Itallie, E. S. V., Devkota, K., Christopher, J., Liu, P., Pun, B., Rhodes, B., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.04.686334 · Cited by 2
Towards a universal foundation model for biobank-scale human genome variationPreprint
Xu, A. G., Xu, Y., Xing, Y., Luo, P., Yang, J., Bai, Y., & Tang, K. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.29.635579 · Cited by 2
Modeling the structure-conditioned sequence landscape for large-scale protein design with TriFlowPreprint
Srinivasan, H., Yuan, R., Zhang, J., Cong, Q., & Zhou, J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.11.30.691458 · Cited by 2
De novo designed bifunctional proteins for targeted protein degradationPreprint
Mylemans, B., Korona, B., Acevedo‐Jake, A. M., MacRae, A., Edwards, T. A., Huang, D. T. C., Wilson, A. J., Itzhaki, L. S., & Woolfson, D. N. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.22.695915 · Cited by 2
Learning Dynamic Protein Representations at Scale with DistogramsPreprint
Portal, N., Karroucha, W., Mallet, V., & Bonomi, M. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.29.702509 · Cited by 3
Architectonic Spandrels in the Origin of Enzymatic FunctionPreprint
Poley-Gil, M., Fernandez-Martin, M., Banka, A., Heinzinger, M., Rost, B., Valencia, A., & Parra, R. G. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.09.704872 · Cited by 2
Bülbül, E. F., Bang, S., George, K., Bianchi, G., Raj, P., Chung, S., Pauline, V., Hochstrasser, R., Minas, H. A., Elgaher, W. A. M., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.03.709401 · Cited by 2
Effects of protein interface mutations on protein quality and affinityPreprint
de Kanter, J. K., Smorodina, E., Minnegalieva, A. R., Arts, M., Blaabjerg, L. M., Frolenkova, M., Rawat, P., Wolfram, L., Britze, H., Wilke, Y., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.24.713863 · Cited by 2
GROQ-seq Enables Cross-site Reproducibility for High-Throughput Measurement of Protein FunctionPreprint
Spinner, A., Ross, D., Cortade, D. L., Ikonomova, S. P., Baranowski, C., Dhroso, A., Apel, A. R., Sheldon, K. N., Duquette, C., Densmore, D. M., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.07.716961 · Cited by 2
Chun, C., Sohn, B.-K., Ki, H., Jo, J. H., An, H.-T., Park, J., Lee, J., Choi, S., Choi, J. H., Cho, H., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.21.719857 · Cited by 2
Lin, Y., Lee, M., Vermani, A., Jiang, E., Cooman, S. D., Špeťko, M., & AlQuraishi, M. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.01.722168 · Cited by 4
Benchmarking and behavioral characterization of LLM agents for protein designPreprint
Kim, J., & Romero, P. A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.06.723381 · Cited by 6
Reverse-engineering amyloid strains with generative protein designPreprint
Gadhe, L. G., Konstantoulea, K., Mazumder, A., Chen, J., Joachimiak, Ł. A., & Louros, N. N. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.08.723915 · Cited by 2
Prosculpt: Lowering the Barrier to Computational Protein DesignPreprint
Olivieri, F., Konstantinova, A. V., Ribnikar, N., Bizjak, N., Žnidar, Ž., Abel, K., Rajh, E., & Ljubetič, A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.25.732351 · Cited by 2
Specificity-driven protein binder design with Odin-MultiPreprint
Brasas, V., Christensen, C. R., Björnsson, K. H., Møller, V. E., Scapolo, B., Benard-Valle, M., Nygaard, M. M., Nielsen, J. C., Hadrup, S. R., Johansen, K. H., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.08.749745 · Cited by 2
Afpdb: an efficient structure manipulation package for AI protein design
Zhou, Y., Cox, J. W., Zhou, B., Zhu, S., Yang, Z. H., & Spraggon, G. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae654 · Cited by 1
Campbell, M. E., Ohler, A. R., McGill, M. J., & Buller, A. R. (2025) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.202422109 · Cited by 1
Patat, A. S., & Nalbantoğlu, Ö. U. (2025) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26810 · Cited by 1
Pan-protein Design Learning Enables Task-adaptive Generalization for Low-resource Enzyme Design
Zheng, J., Wang, G., Zhang, H., & Li, S. Z. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889962 · Cited by 1
A synergistic strategy for E2E+ESM2-driven protein a design and wet lab validation
Song, H., Zhang, S., He, Q. Z., Zhang, H., Fang, C., & Lin, X. (2025) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.03.008 · Cited by 2
Sequence and taxonomic feature evaluation facilitated the discovery of alcohol oxidases
Han, Y., Ding, X., Tan, J., Sun, Y., Duan, Y., Liu, Z., Zheng, G., & Lu, D. (2025) · Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.synbio.2025.04.014 · Cited by 1
Jiang, Y., Huang, S., & Chen, H. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144609 · Cited by 1
AFToolkit: a framework for molecular modeling of proteins with AlphaFold-derived representations
Sindeeva, M., Telepov, A., Ivanisenko, N. V., Shashkova, T., Khrabrov, K., Tsypin, A., Kadurin, A., & Kardymon, O. L. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf324 · Cited by 1
Protein arginine methylation regulates anti-inflammatory programming in response to aging stress
Yao, Y., Motomura, K., Kim, J., Hengphasatporn, K., Kako, K., Maruhashi, S., Kasai, F., Mizukami, H., Toma-Fukai, S., Muratani, M., et al. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113095 · Cited by 2
Eder, O. M., Totaro, M. G., Minnich, S. M., Oberdorfer, G., & Winkler, A. (2025) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2025.07.018 · Cited by 1
Piochi, L. F., & Khakzad, H. (2025) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2025.101369 · Cited by 1
Graph Learning-Based Scoring of RNA–Protein Complex Structures
Jiang, Z., Zhang, Y., Yang, G., & Liu, R. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00831 · Cited by 1
De novo and scaffold-based design of GDF15 binders for cancer cachexia diagnostics and therapeutics
Ahn, J., Cho, R., Kim, S. B., Lee, D. S., & Kim, H. M. (2026) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-026-01727-x · Cited by 1
Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Main Protease with D-Peptides
Feng, L., Liu, J., Li, C., Wang, Q., Lai, L., & Zhang, C. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01839 · Cited by 1
Efficient Mining and Characterization of Two Novel Keratinases from Metagenomic Database
Zhang, J., Xu, G., Yi, Z., & Tang, X. (2025) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom15111527 · Cited by 1
Mazhar, S., Koser, T., & Khalid, R. R. (2025) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-025-00702-4 · Cited by 1
Peptide Therapeutics: AI-Driven Design and Structural Bioengineering
Shah, M., & Woo, H. G. (2025) · KOBRA Reports · doi:10.64066/kobrareports.25.0025 · Cited by 1
A new LUCApedia database for data-driven research on early evolutionary history
Nikfarjam, Z., Thota, I., Nikfarjam, A., Kailing, F., & Goldman, A. D. (2025) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbaf309 · Cited by 1
Chen, Z., Fan, K., Ye, J., Xu, Z., & Wei, Y. (2025) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones10010020 · Cited by 1
Plant natural product biosynthesis through metabolon engineering
Zhang, C., Shi, J., Deng, R., Chen, M., Fernie, A. R., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.70146 · Cited by 1
mCSM-metal: A Deep Learning Resource to Predict Effect of Mutations on Metal Ion Binding
Kumar, A., Malik, A. J., & Ascher, D. B. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2026.169678 · Cited by 1
Frontiers and challenges in the design of binders for intrinsically disordered proteins
Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Fang, M., Peng, Z., & Cao, L. (2026) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2026.103256 · Cited by 1
As 5mC enters a programmable era: charted avenues for cancer understanding and intervention
Shi, Q., Liu, P., Zhu, J.-K., & Sun, S. (2026) · Oral Science and Homeostatic Medicine · doi:10.26599/oshm.2026.9610044 · Cited by 1
AI-guided thermal stabilization of endo-β-1,3-glucanase
Liu, R., Li, S., Zhang, H., Qiu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, H., Li, J., & Zheng, P. (2026) · Chinese Chemical Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2026.112729 · Cited by 1
Young, J., Nelson, D., Gu, L., & Zhou, R. (2026) · AI Chemistry · doi:10.3390/aichem1020007 · Cited by 1
Metric-driven biosensors for analyte detection
Granja‐Travez, R. S., Shin, S., Miller, J. E., Jha, R. K., & Dale, T. (2026) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2026.103494 · Cited by 1
Liu, W., Tian, L., Xie, J., Wu, L., Hu, L., Ge, R., Wang, Y., & Cao, M. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108931 · Cited by 1
Ahmad, M., Iqbal, M. W., Mirza, M. U., Raza, M. A., Alghamdi, H. A., Haider, S. Z., Nawaz, M. Z., & Yu, K. (2026) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2026.110927 · Cited by 1
Zhu, Z., & Song, C. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6c00617 · Cited by 1
Analysing open-source protein folding models for nanobody binding prediction
Vogt, Y., Roßberg, R., Habermann, J., Kluge, P., Xu, W., Naouar, M., Hirschberg, S., Miething, C., Bödecker, J., Kalweit, M., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2026.1858891 · Cited by 1
Li, M., & Qing, G. (2026) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6c00336 · Cited by 1
Design of programmable molecular interfaces for synthetic biology and therapeutic applications
Nickel, L., Pyatova, E., & Correia, B. E. (2026) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2026.102759 · Cited by 1
Lipinski, B., Unmuth, L., Tran, T. H. H., Harwood, J., Arras, P., Becker, S., Harwardt, J., Guarnera, E., Helming, L., Zaynagetdinov, R., et al. (2026) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2026.2726042 · Cited by 1
Zheng, Z., Zhang, B., Zhong, B., Yu, J., Liu, K., Li, Z., Zhu, J., Wei, T., & Chen, H.-F. (2026) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014290 · Cited by 1
Cortada, E. P., & Osuna, S. (2025) · Comptes Rendus Chimie · doi:10.5802/crchim.389 · Cited by 1
Wang, W., Yu, W., Yang, Q., Zheng, R., & Li, M. (2026) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.1101/2025.05.18.654422 · Cited by 1
Yu, Y., Jiang, F., Ma, X., Zhang, L., Zhong, B., Ouyang, W., Fan, G., Yu, H., Hong, L., & Li, M. (2025) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/085713-4581 · Cited by 1
A Survey of Pretrained Protein Language Models
Pokharel, S., Pratyush, P., Chaudhari, M., Heinzinger, M., Caragea, D., Saigo, H., & KC, D. B. (2025) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-4623-6_1 · Cited by 1
Enzyme sequence optimisation via Gromov-Wasserstein Autoencoders integrating MSA techniques
Wang, X., Li, Y., Hou, X., & Liu, H. (2025) · Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1080/14756366.2025.2524742 · Cited by 1
Zinovjev, K., Ruiz‐Pernía, J. J., & Tuñón, I. (2025) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1515/pac-2025-0500 · Cited by 1
Yang, L., Gao, Y. Q., Huang, Y., & Yang, J. (2025) · Scientia Sinica Chimica · doi:10.1360/ssc-2025-0169 · Cited by 1
Cheng, L., Wei, T., Cui, X., Chen, H.-F., & Yu, Z. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf391 · Cited by 1
Kotel'nikov, D. D., Tatarinova, K. S., & Zhdanov, D. D. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26199262 · Cited by 1
Accessible, uniform protein property prediction with a scikit-learn based toolset AIDE
Komp, E., Johansson, K. E., Gauthier, N. P., Gado, J. E., Lindorff‐Larsen, K., & Beckham, G. T. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf544 · Cited by 1
Alternate Geometric and Semantic Denoising Diffusion for Protein Inverse Folding
Wang, C., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Zhai, Z., Shen, J., & Zhang, K. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06066-2_21 · Cited by 1
Gaillard, T. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c03662 · Cited by 1
Automated Deep Learning‐Based Pipelines for Multi‐Objective De Novo Protein Design
Nallathambi, A., & Kuhlman, B. A. (2025) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.70208 · Cited by 1
Protein language model supervised motif-scaffolding design with GPDL
Zhang, B., Liu, K., Zheng, Z., Zhu, J., Li, Z., Liu, Y., Mu, J., Wei, T., & Chen, H. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.148441 · Cited by 1
Rewiring microbial metabolism through post-translational switches
Xu, X., Yang, L., Liu, J., Lv, X., & Liu, L. (2025) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.10.002 · Cited by 1
Design of Specific Peptide Inhibitors of Toxin-Antitoxin-Mediated Antiphage Defense
Ghose, D. A., Swanson, S., Birnbaum, F., Britton, D., Gan, J. L., Mahoney, E. M., Laub, M. T., & Keating, A. E. (2025) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5c00498 · Cited by 1
Computational cyclic peptide design machine learning & Rosetta based methods
Sarmeili, F., Siegler, H., Powers, A. C., & Hosseinzadeh, P. (2025) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2025.09.016 · Cited by 1
Yun, J., Yang, S., Kwon, J. H., Vecchietti, L. F., Choi, J. H., Choi, M., Ku, K. B., Ro, H., Kim, K., Cha, M., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202506764 · Cited by 1
Conformational plasticity enables functional switching in diatom light-harvesting complexes
Sousani, T.-I., Zender, B., Maity, S., Kleinekathöfer, U., & Daskalakis, V. (2025) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01774-x · Cited by 1
HuAbDiffusion: a discrete language diffusion model used for antibody humanization
Liu, D., Hao, X., & Fan, L. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf658 · Cited by 3
Protein crystallization strategies in structure-based drug design
Ek, M. S., Öster, L., Käck, H., & Sjögren, T. (2025) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2025.2605355 · Cited by 1
Wang, X., Tan, Y., Yang, Y., Yu, H., Cheng, J., Zhang, Z., Song, C. M., Zhang, Y., & Yin, Y. (2026) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c03103 · Cited by 1
Multi-objective optimization for designing structurally similar proteins with dissimilar sequences
Akiba, R., Moriwaki, Y., Ishitani, R., & Yoshikawa, N. (2026) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods · doi:10.1080/27660400.2025.2611575 · Cited by 1
How to address the anode dilemma and explore future prospects of microbial fuel cells
Liu, W., Zhou, Y., Yang, T., Xu, X., Lin, J., Zheng, Y., Guo, M., Huang, Y., Xie, Y., Liu, H., et al. (2026) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2026.116745 · Cited by 1
Advances in Therapeutic Antibody Discovery and Development Targeting G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
Hutchings, C. J., Ünsal, S., Rappas, M., Barnes, M., Waldhoer, M., Holland, B., & Culka, M. (2026) · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives · doi:10.1002/prp2.70216 · Cited by 1
Kırboğa, K. K., & Küçüksille, E. U. (2026) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.70114 · Cited by 1
ModelCIF Update: Supporting Emerging Classes of Computational Macromolecular Models
Tauriello, G., Lill, Y., Sgrignani, J., Zoete, V., Singer, B., Vallat, B. K., Webb, B., Garello, T., Bienert, S., Feig, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2026.169658 · Cited by 1
A stabilized tandem antigen chimera that elicits potent malaria transmission-reducing activity
Ivanochko, D., Miura, K., Hailemariam, S., Ravichandran, R., Song, Y., Huang, W., Stoter, R., Teelen, K., van Gemert, G., Leaf, E. M., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68761-1 · Cited by 1
Self-citationWei, S., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Tang, C., & Tan, J. (2026) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag042 · Cited by 3
Reliable repurposing of the antibody interactome inside the cell
O’Shea, C. M., Shahzad, R., Aghasoleimani, K., Newman, S., Panmanee, J., Schalkwyk, L. C., Brooke, G. N., Benson, F. E., Trimmer, J. S., Bosco, D. A., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69057-0 · Cited by 1
Design of novel enzymes with the incorporation of noncanonical amino acids
Cheng, L., Yang, L., Song, Z., & Yu, H. (2026) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2025.2612060 · Cited by 1
QO-BRA: A Quantum Operator-Based Autoencoder for De Novo Molecular Design
Yu, Y., Calcagno, F., Li, H., & Batista, V. S. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01704 · Cited by 1
Yekeen, A. A., Meyer, C. J., McCoy, M. K., Posner, B. A., & Westover, K. D. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02430 · Cited by 1
AI-driven precision protease engineering for the food industry
Wu, R., Zhou, J., Han, W., Junrui, W. U., & Mu, Z. (2026) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2026.105611 · Cited by 1
AlphaFold2 ‐Guided Cyclic Peptide Stabilizer Design to Target Protein–Protein Interactions
Halbwedl, N., & Zacharias, M. (2026) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.70123 · Cited by 1
Unlocking the undruggable spliceosome: generative AI and structural dynamics in cancer therapy
Steuer, J., & Kahraman, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2026.1774239 · Cited by 1
Lin, Z., Wei, J., He, X., Chen, Y., & Honghai, Z. H. O. U. (2026) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2026.108982 · Cited by 1
Zhang, X. Y., Yao, Y., Zhang, L., Ye, W. A. N. G., Zhang, X., Duan, L., Shang, Y., & Ma, Y. (2026) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134364 · Cited by 1
Zhu, M., Rao, J., Chen, X., Yuan, Q., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i2.37142 · Cited by 2
Redesigning myoglobin via functional site scaffolding for enhanced catalytic functions
Zha, Z., Wang, Y., Teng, C., Xue, H., Su, B., Wang, H., Yu, Y., & Li, C. (2026) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2026.153642 · Cited by 1
De Novo Protein Design Enables Targeting of Intractable Oncogenic Protein–Protein Interfaces
Prakash, V., Najy, Y., Garrett, K., Edwards, B. F. P., & Kidder, B. L. (2026) · Biologics · doi:10.3390/biologics6010009 · Cited by 1
Precision Medicine Targets in Glymphatic System Dysfunction: A Genomic and Molecular Perspective
Wang, Q., Gao, L., Yang, X., Chen, B., Li, W., & Wang, H. (2026) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00962 · Cited by 1
Anticalins: A viable alternative to nanobodies? –from discovery to AI-driven development: A review
Luo, Y., Zhang, J., Dong, Z., & Ding, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.151623 · Cited by 1
When Biology Meets Medicine: A Perspective on Foundation Models
Niu, K., Wang, Y., Zou, L., & Huang, J. (2026) · Advanced Intelligent Discovery · doi:10.1002/aidi.202500245 · Cited by 1
Evolutionary Assembly and Future Design of Gibberellin Signaling
Fan, W., Chen, X., Li, D., Gao, X., & Fu, X. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.75049 · Cited by 1
A highly limited amino acid library from asteroid Bennu yields wide-ranging protein folds
Bartlett, S., Gupta, A., Phung, D., Goldford, J. E., Yang, J., Hlouchová, K., Fischer, W. W., & Yung, Y. L. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71509-6 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Dauparas, J., Anishchenko, I., Bennett, N., Bai, H., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Courbet, A., de Haas, R. J., Bethel, N., Leung, P. J. Y., Huddy, T. F., Pellock, S., Tischer, D., Chan, F., Koepnick, B., Nguyen, H., Kang, A., Sankaran, B., Bera, A. K., King, N. P., & Baker, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2022-10-07
- Volume
- 378
- Issue
- 6615
- Pages
- 49-56
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC9997061
- OpenAlex
- W4296032638
- Semantic Scholar
- 98926d43356e87c22c82efc132dcaaac1ff40ebe
- Cited by
- 2,210
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 927 · 2025: 660 · 2024: 391 · 2023: 201 · 2022: 29
- FWCI
- 94.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DEAC02-05CH11231, DGE-214-0004, 1937533, P30 GM124169, 2140004)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P30 GM124169-01, DE-AC02-05CH11231, GT11817)
- U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, GM124169, DE-AC02-)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (g-2021-16899, DE-AC02-05CH11231)
- Washington Research Foundation
- Open Philanthropy Project
- National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02–05CH11231)
- Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231, GM124169-01, P30GM124169)
- Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, DE-AC02-05CH11231., AC02–05CH11231)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein sequence design, de novo protein design, ProteinMPNN, deep learning, sequence recovery, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cryoelectron Microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
