Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrofluidic fiber muscles

Afsar, O. K., Pupillo, G., Vitucci, G., Babatain, W., Ishii, H., Cacucciolo, V.·2026·Science Robotics
DOI 10.1126/scirobotics.ady6438
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Actuators are to robots what muscles are to humans. They enable motion and determine strength and dexterity. The fiber form factor makes skeletal muscles modular, scalable, and densely integrated (50% of human body weight). In contrast, servo motors that drive today’s robots lack the flexibility and modularity of muscle fibers, limiting integration and dexterity. Here, we report electrofluidic fiber muscles, soft artificial muscles for robotic applications with power density comparable to skeletal muscles (50 watts per kilogram), contraction strains of 20%, and response time of 0.3 second. These 2-millimeter-thick muscles comprise antagonistic fluidic actuators driven by electrohydrodynamic fiber pumps in a closed circuit. They require no external liquid reservoir and are electrically driven, untethered, and silent. We demonstrated that performance is increased by pre-pressurizing the muscles at an optimal bias pressure. Applying bias pressure allowed the antagonist actuator to act as a reservoir for the agonist, enabled 200% higher operating voltages by preventing cavitation, and leveraged the nonlinear pressure-stroke response of the actuators, increasing strain threefold at a given pump pressure. We characterized and modeled their dynamics, identifying optimal bias pressures. Electrofluidic muscles scale by simply bundling fibers. By selecting the ratio between pumps and actuators, we programmed their performance for different robotic tasks: a fast lever (180 millimeters per second) that launches objects in <0.3 second; a strong bundle that lifts 4 kilograms (200 times its weight) with a 30-millimeter stroke; a woven muscle that bends a robot arm by 40° and is compliant enough for a human handshake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scirobotics.ady6438

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. C. O. Horgan, J. G. Murphy, Magic angles for fibrous incompressible elastic materials. Proc. A 474, 20170728 (2018).
  2. H. F. Schulte “The characteristics of the McKibben artificial muscle” in The Application of External Power in Prosthetics and Orthotics (National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council 1961) pp. 94–115.

Metadata

Authors
Afsar, O. K., Pupillo, G., Vitucci, G., Babatain, W., Ishii, H., & Cacucciolo, V.
Venue
Science Robotics
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2026-03-25
Volume
11
Issue
112
ISSN
2470-9476
DOI
10.1126/scirobotics.ady6438
Cited by
12
References
64
Language
en
Funders
  • MIT Media Lab
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101116856)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.