Cited by 296Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer

Open access
Whitley, Melodi Javid, Cardona, Diana M., Lazarides, Alexander L., Spasojevic, Ivan, Ferrer, Jorge M., Cahill, Joan, Lee, Chang-Lung, Snuderl, Matija +18 more·2016·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure for patients with solid tumors. Intraoperative detection of microscopic residual cancer in the tumor bed could be used to decrease the risk of a positive surgical margin, reduce rates of reexcision, and tailor adjuvant therapy. We used a protease-activated fluorescent imaging probe, LUM015, to detect cancer in vivo in a mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and ex vivo in a first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial. In mice, intravenous injection of LUM015 labeled tumor cells, and residual fluorescence within the tumor bed predicted local recurrence. In 15 patients with STS or breast cancer, intravenous injection of LUM015 before surgery was well tolerated. Imaging of resected human tissues showed that fluorescence from tumor was significantly higher than fluorescence from normal tissues. LUM015 biodistribution, pharmacokinetic profiles, and metabolism were similar in mouse and human subjects. Tissue concentrations of LUM015 and its metabolites, including fluorescently labeled lysine, demonstrated that LUM015 is selectively distributed to tumors where it is activated by proteases. Experiments in mice with a constitutively active PEGylated fluorescent imaging probe support a model where tumor-selective probe distribution is a determinant of increased fluorescence in cancer. These co-clinical studies suggest that the tumor specificity of protease-activated imaging probes, such as LUM015, is dependent on both biodistribution and enzyme activity. Our first-in-human data support future clinical trials of LUM015 and other protease-sensitive probes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad0293

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proof of concept for synthetic biomarkers has been shown in humans by identifying residual cancer after surgery with a protease-activated fluorescent probe.

    “and identification of residual cancer after surgery in humans through a protease-activated fluorescent probe.91”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [91]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Taylor DL Wang Y-l Fluorescence microscopy of living cells in culture Methods in Cell Biology Wilson L Academic Press San Diego, CA 1989 29 1 328 2913468

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitley, M. J., Cardona, D. M., Lazarides, A. L., Spasojevic, I., Ferrer, J. M., Cahill, J., Lee, C.-L., Snuderl, M., Blazer, D. G., Hwang, E. S., Greenup, R. A., Mosca, P. J., Mito, J. K., Cuneo, K. C., Larrier, N. A., O’Reilly, E. K., Riedel, R. F., Eward, W. C., Strasfeld, D. B., Fukumura, D., Jain, R. K., Lee, W. D., Griffith, L. G., Bawendi, M. G., Kirsch, D. G., & Brigman, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Lumicell (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kirsch, David G.
  • Brigman, Brian E.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2016-01-06
Volume
8
Issue
320
Pages
320ra4-320ra4
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2240104466
Cited by
296
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PMC
Funders
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Advanced Clinical Research Award
  • NIH (#T32GM007171)
  • National Cancer Institute Small Business Innovation Research (#1U43CA165024)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Science (#UL1TR001117)
  • Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center Support (5P30-CA-014236-38)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
tumor imaging, soft tissue sarcoma, breast cancer, local recurrence, intraoperative tumor detection, tumor bed, pharmacokinetics, lysine labeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Diagnostic Imaging, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Neoplasms, Peptide Hydrolases, Sarcoma, Tissue Distribution, Mice, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review