Cited by 57Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Echinocandin Susceptibility Testing of Candida spp. Using EUCAST EDef 7.1 and CLSI M27-A3 Standard Procedures: Analysis of the Influence of Bovine Serum Albumin Supplementation, Storage Time, and Drug Lots

Open access
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling, Rodriguez-Tudela, Juan-Luis, Park, Steven, Garcia-Effron, Guillermo, Delmas, Guillaume, Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel, Gomez-Lopez, Alicia, Perlin, David S.·2011·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The MICs of echinocandins against Candida isolates with fks mutations are higher than those for wild-type (WT) isolates. However, the MIC ranges for susceptible and mutant populations overlap or are poorly separated. It was recently reported that a greater separation could be achieved in the presence of serum. To more fully explore this possibility, we compared the performances of the reference microdilution methods by using standard and bovine serum albumin (BSA)-supplemented growth medium. Anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin MICs were determined according to EUCAST and CLSI methods and with 50% BSA in the medium for 93 clinical isolates, including Candida albicans (20/10 [number of isolates/number of mutants]), C. glabrata (19/10), C. dubliniensis (2/1), C. krusei (16/3), C. parapsilosis (19), and C. tropicalis (19/4) isolates. Stability of the plates was tested after storage at −80°C for 2 and 6 months, and the performance of two different lots of caspofungin was investigated. The addition of BSA to the medium resulted in higher MICs (1 to 9 2-fold dilution steps) for all isolates and compounds. The increases were greatest for anidulafungin and micafungin and, among WT isolates, for C. parapsilosis . The number of very major errors (VMEs) was reduced (24% [20/84 isolates] versus ≤7% [6/84 isolates]) using BSA-supplemented EUCAST medium but not using BSA-supplemented CLSI medium (6% versus 9%). MIC results were unchanged after 6 months of storage of test plates. The two lots of caspofungin yielded identical results. Addition of BSA to the EUCAST medium increases the ability to differentiate between WT isolates and isolates harboring resistance mutations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01364-10

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The high number of caspofungin non-susceptible isolates may in part be associated with variability in the caspofungin used for in vitro testing.

    “This may in part be associated with variability in the caspofungin used for in vitro testing (46).”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [46]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arendrup, M. C., Rodriguez-Tudela, J.-L., Park, S., Garcia-Effron, G., Delmas, G., Cuenca-Estrella, M., Gomez-Lopez, A., & Perlin, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
  • Public Health Research Institute, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
  • Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain
Corresponding author
Arendrup, Maiken Cavling
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2011-04
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1580-1587
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2152007862
Cited by
57
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI069397, R01AI069397)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida, caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida dubliniensis, Candida krusei, very major errors, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Cattle, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review