Cited by 98Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFungal Infections and Studies

In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, ravuconazole, in a murine candidiasis model

Open access
Andes, D., Marchillo, K., Stamstad, T., Conklin, R.·2003·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

In vivo studies have characterized the pharmacodynamic characteristics of the triazole fluconazole. These investigations demonstrated that the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to the MIC (24-h AUC/MIC ratio) is the critical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameter associated with treatment efficacy. Further analysis demonstrated that a fluconazole 24-h AUC/MIC ratio of 20 to 25 was predictive of treatment success in both experimental models and clinical trials. We used a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Candida albicans infection to similarly characterize the time course activity of the new triazole ravuconazole. The PK/PD parameters (percent time above the MIC, AUC/MIC ratio, and peak level in serum/MIC ratio) were correlated with in vivo efficacy, as measured by organism number in kidney cultures after 24 and 72 h of therapy. Ravuconazole kinetics and protein binding were performed in neutropenic infected mice. Peak/dose and AUC/dose values ranged from 0.03 to 0.04 and 0.30 to 0.34, respectively. Serum elimination half-life ranged from 3.9 to 4.8 h. Protein binding was 95.8%. Single-dose postantifungal effect studies demonstrated prolonged suppression of organism regrowth after serum ravuconazole levels had fallen below the MIC. Treatment efficacies with the five dosing intervals studied were similar, supporting the argument for the AUC/MIC ratio as the PK/PD parameter predictive of efficacy. Nonlinear regression analysis also suggested that the AUC/MIC ratio was strongly predictive of treatment outcomes (AUC/MIC ratio, R 2 = 91%; peak/MIC ratio, R 2 = 85%; percent time above the MIC, R 2 = 47 to 65%). Similar studies were conducted with seven additional C. albicans isolates with various ravuconazole susceptibilities (MIC, 0.016 to 0.12 μg/ml) to determine if a similar 24-h AUC/MIC ratio was associated with efficacy. The ravuconazole free-drug AUC/MIC ratios were similar for all of the organisms studied (10 to 36; mean ± SD = 20.3 ± 8.2; P = 0.43). These free-drug AUC/MIC ratios are similar to those observed for fluconazole in this model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.47.4.1193-1199.2003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo animal studies against Candida strains with widely varying MICs show that the 24-hour AUC/MIC target associated with 50% maximal effect for triazoles is near 25 when free drug levels are considered.

    “In vivo animal studies against a large number of Candida strains with widely varying MICs (more than 2000-fold) show that the 24-hour AUC/MIC target associated with efficacy (50% maximal effect) for triazoles occurs at a value near 25 when free drug (non-protein bound) levels are considered.”
  • In vivo studies have revealed prolonged periods of growth suppression after triazole concentrations decrease to less than the MIC (long PAFE).

    “In addition, in vivo studies have revealed prolonged periods of growth suppression after triazole concentrations decrease to less than the MIC (long PAFE).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Craig, W. A. 1998. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:1-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [12]Kunin, C. M. 1965. The importance of serum protein binding in determining antimicrobial activity and concentration in serum. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 7:168-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [24]Schafer-Korting, M., H. C. Korting, W. Rittler, and W. Obermuller. 1995. Influence of serum protein binding on the in vitro activity of antifungal agents. Infection 23:292-297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andes, D., Marchillo, K., Stamstad, T., & Conklin, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Andes, D.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2003-04
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1193-1199
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2166682252
Cited by
98
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
ravuconazole, triazole antifungals, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, Candida albicans, candidiasis, PK/PD relationship, AUC/MIC ratio, neutropenic mice, free drug concentration, drug sensitivity, treatment efficacy prediction, fluconazole comparison, elimination half-life, protein binding, dosing interval
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred ICR, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Thiazoles, Triazoles, Area Under Curve, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review