Cited by 210Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Distinct Patterns of Gene Expression Associated with Development of Fluconazole Resistance in Serial Candida albicans Isolates from Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients with Oropharyngeal Candidiasis

Open access
Lopez-Ribot, Jose L., McAtee, Robert K., Lee, Linda N., Kirkpatrick, William R., White, Theodore C., Sanglard, Dominique, Patterson, Thomas F.·1998·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Resistance to fluconazole is becoming an increasing problem in the management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Strains obtained from five patients developed decreased fluconazole susceptibility over time. DNA strain typing confirmed the high degree of relatedness among isolates from one patient and the variability among isolates from different patients. Expression of genes involved in development of fluconazole resistance was monitored in each isolate using probes specific for ERG11 (lanosterol 14α-demethylase), MDR1 (a major facilitator), and CDR (ATP-binding cassette or ABC transporter) genes. Increased expression of CDR genes was detected in the series of isolates from two patients. Isolates from one of the two patients also demonstrated increased ERG11 expression, whereas isolates from the other patient did not. Increased levels of MDR1 mRNA correlated with increased resistance in sequential isolates from another patient. Initial overexpression of MDR1 with subsequent overexpression of CDR genes and a final isolate again overexpressing MDR1 were detected in serial isolates from another patient. In another patient, overexpression of these genes was not detected despite an eightfold increase in fluconazole MIC. In this patient, sequence data of the ERG11 gene revealed no point mutations associated with decreased susceptibility. Five different patterns of gene expression were observed in isolates recovered from five patients who developed resistance. Therefore, these experiments demonstrate that a variety of mechanisms or combinations of mechanisms are associated with the development of fluconazole drug resistance. Additional studies are needed to estimate the frequency and clinical impact of these mechanisms of resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.42.11.2932

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sambrook, J. F., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  2. Vanden Bossche, H., P. Marichal, J. Gorrens, D. Bellens, H. Moereels, and P. A. J. Janssen. 1990. Mutation in cytochrome P450-dependent 14␣ de- methylase results in decreased affinity for azole antifungals. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 18:56-59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez-Ribot, J. L., McAtee, R. K., Lee, L. N., Kirkpatrick, W. R., White, T. C., Sanglard, D., & Patterson, T. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Center for Infectious Disease Research (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
1998-11
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
2932-2937
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W1832945357
Cited by
210
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R29AI042401)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE011381)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR001346)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
fluconazole resistance, Candida albicans, oropharyngeal candidiasis, HIV infection, drug resistance mechanisms, gene expression, ERG11, MDR1, ABC transporters, serial isolates, antifungal susceptibility
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Oral, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Pharyngeal Diseases, RNA, Messenger, HIV Infections, Fluconazole, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1, Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review