Cited by 25Fungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The UPC2 Promoter in Candida albicans Contains Two cis -Acting Elements That Bind Directly to Upc2p, Resulting in Transcriptional Autoregulation

Open access
Hoot, Samantha J., Brown, Ryan P., Oliver, Brian G., White, Theodore C.·2010·Eukaryotic Cell

Abstract

In Candida albicans , ergosterol biosynthetic genes, including ERG11 , which encodes the target of azole antifungal drugs, are regulated by the transcriptional regulator Upc2p. To initially characterize the promoter of the UPC2 gene, 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends was used to identify two transcriptional initiation sites upstream of the ATG codon. The regions within the UPC2 promoter required for azole regulation of the UPC2 promoter were then identified using nested deletions fused to a luciferase reporter which were tested for azole inducibility in wild-type (WT) and upc2 Δ /upc2 Δ strains. Two distinct regions important for azole induction were identified: a Upc2p-dependent region (UDR) between bp −450 and −350 upstream of the ATG codon and a Upc2p-independent region (UIR) between bp −350 and −250 upstream of the ATG codon. Within the UDR, loss or mutation of the sterol response element (SRE), so named because of homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Upc2p binding site, resulted in a decrease in both basal and induced expression in the WT strain but did not affect azole inducibility in the upc2 Δ/ upc2 Δ deletion strain. Gel shift analyses using the DNA binding domain of Upc2p confirmed binding of the protein to two SRE-related sequences within the UPC2 promoter, with strongest binding to the UDR SRE. Detailed gel shift analyses of the UDR SRE shows that Upc2p binds to a bipartite element within the UPC2 promoter, including the previously identified SRE and a new, adjacent element, the short direct repeat (SDR), with partial homology to the SRE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/ec.00130-10

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]3. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1995. Current protocols in molecular biology, vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
  2. [22]22. Znaidi, S., S. Weber, O. Zin-Al-Abdin, P. Bomme, S. Saidane, S. Drouin, S. Lemieux, X. De Deken, F. Robert, and M. Raymond. 2008. Abstr. 9th ASM Conf. Candida Candidiasis, abstr. C255, Jersey City, NJ, 23 to 28 March 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoot, S. J., Brown, R. P., Oliver, B. G., & White, T. C.
Affiliations
Center for Infectious Disease Research (US)
Corresponding author
White, Theodore C.
Venue
Eukaryotic Cell
Published
2010-09
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
1354-1362
ISSN
  • 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-9786
OpenAlex
W2108846692
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eukaryotic Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE011367, R01DE017078, R01 DE-11367, R01 DE 14161, R01DE014161)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Candida albicans, sterol response element, cis-regulatory elements, transcriptional autoregulation, ERG11, ergosterol biosynthesis, transcription start sites
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Candida albicans, Fungal Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Transcription, Genetic, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Response Elements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review