The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tagging of Endogenous Genes in a Toxoplasma gondii Strain Lacking Ku80
Open accessAbstract
As with other organisms with a completed genome sequence, opportunities for performing large-scale studies, such as expression and localization, on Toxoplasma gondii are now much more feasible. We present a system for tagging genes endogenously with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a Δ ku80 strain. Ku80 is involved in DNA strand repair and nonhomologous DNA end joining; previous studies in other organisms have shown that in its absence, random integration is eliminated, allowing the insertion of constructs with homologous sequences into the proper loci. We generated a vector consisting of YFP and a dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase selectable marker. The YFP is preceded by a ligation-independent cloning (LIC) cassette, which allows the insertion of PCR products containing complementary LIC sequences. We demonstrated that the Δ ku80 strain is more effective and efficient in integrating the YFP-tagged constructs into the correct locus than wild-type strain RH. We then selected several hypothetical proteins that were identified by a proteomic screen of excreted-secreted antigens and that displayed microarray expression profiles similar to known micronemal proteins, with the thought that these could potentially be new proteins with roles in cell invasion. We localized these hypothetical proteins by YFP fluorescence and showed expression by immunoblotting. Our findings demonstrate that the combination of the Δ ku80 strain and the pYFP.LIC constructs reduces both the time and cost required to determine localization of a new gene of interest. This should allow the opportunity for performing larger-scale studies of novel T. gondii genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shaner, N. C., Campbell, R. E., Steinbach, P. A., Giepmans, B. N. G., Palmer, A. E., & Tsien, R. Y. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1037 · Cited by 4,619
The double-strand-break repair model for recombination
Szostak, J. W., Orr-Weaver, T. L., Rothstein, R. J., & Stahl, F. W. (1983) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8 · Cited by 2,437
Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination.
Orr-Weaver, T. L., Szostak, J. W., & Rothstein, R. J. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354 · Cited by 1,455
Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair
Walker, J. R., Corpina, R. A., & Goldberg, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35088000 · Cited by 1,212
Ligation-independent cloning of PCR products (LIC-PCR)
Aslanidis, C., & de Jong, P. J. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6069 · Cited by 1,204
Chaffey, N. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(01)01902-1 · Cited by 1,043
Role of RAD52 Epistasis Group Genes in Homologous Recombination and Double-Strand Break Repair
Symington, L. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.4.630-670.2002 · Cited by 975
Nuclear-encoded proteins target to the plastid in Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum
Waller, R. F., Keeling, P. J., Donald, R. G. K., Striepen, B., Handman, E., Lang-Unnasch, N., Cowman, A. F., Besra, G. S., Roos, D. S., & McFadden, G. I. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.21.12352 · Cited by 714
Malaria: progress, perils, and prospects for eradication
Greenwood, B. M., Fidock, D. A., Kyle, D. E., Kappe, S. H. I., Alonso, P. L., Collins, F. H., & Duffy, P. E. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci33996 · Cited by 709
Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining
Ninomiya, Y., Suzuki, K., Ishii, C., & Inoue, H. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402780101 · Cited by 599
Cited by
A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Toxoplasma Identifies Essential Apicomplexan Genes
Sidik, S. M., Huet, D., Ganesan, S. M., Huynh, M.-H., Wang, T., Nasamu, A. S., Thiru, P., Saeij, J. P. J., Carruthers, V. B., Niles, J. C., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.019 · Cited by 804
Self-citationEfficient Gene Disruption in Diverse Strains of Toxoplasma gondii Using CRISPR/CAS9
Shen, B., Brown, K. M., Lee, T. D., & Sibley, L. D. (2014) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01114-14 · Cited by 473
Behnke, M. S., Wootton, J. C., Lehmann, M. M., Radke, J. B., Lucas, O., Nawas, J., Sibley, L. D., & White, M. W. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012354 · Cited by 297
Braun, L., Brenier-Pinchart, M.-P., Yogavel, M., Curt-Varesano, A., Curt-Bertini, R.-L., Hussain, T., Kieffer-Jaquinod, S., Coute, Y., Pelloux, H., Tardieux, I., et al. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20130103 · Cited by 272
Mechanisms of Toxoplasma gondii persistence and latency
Sullivan, W. J., & Jeffers, V. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00305.x · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Huynh, M.-H., & Carruthers, V. B.
- Venue
- Eukaryotic Cell
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 530-539
- ISSN
- 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-9786
- OpenAlex
- W2143687466
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tagging of Endogenous Genes in a Toxoplasma gondii Strain Lacking Ku80. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/ec.00358-08
- The paper
- Huynh, M.-H., & Carruthers, V. B. (2009). Tagging of Endogenous Genes in a Toxoplasma gondii Strain Lacking Ku80. Eukaryotic Cell. https://doi.org/10.1128/ec.00358-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.