The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans
Open accessAbstract
In conventional DNA fingerprinting, hypervariable and repetitive sequences (minisatellite or microsatellite DNA) are detected with hybridization probes. As demonstrated here, these probes can be used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to generate individual fingerprints. Several conventional DNA fingerprinting probes were used to prime the PCR, yielding distinctive, hypervariable multifragment profiles for different strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. PCR fingerprinting with the oligonucleotide primers (GTG)5, (GACA)4, and the phage M13 core sequence (GAGGGTGGXGGXTCT), but not with (CA)8 or (CT)8, generated DNA polymorphisms with all 42 strains of C. neoformans investigated. PCR fingerprints produced by priming with (GTG)5, (GACA)4, or the M13 core sequence differentiated the two varieties of C. neoformans, C. neoformans var. neoformans (serotypes A and D) and C. neoformans var. gattii (serotypes B and C). Furthermore, strains of serotypes A, D, and B or C could be distinguished from each other by specific PCR fingerprint patterns. These primers, which also successfully amplified hypervariable DNA segments from other species, provide a convenient method of identification at the species or individual level. Amplification of polymorphic DNA patterns by PCR with these primers offers several advantages over classical DNA fingerprinting techniques, appears to be more reliable than other PCR-based methods for detecting polymorphic DNA, such as analysis of random-amplified polymorphic DNA, and should be applicable to many other organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers
Williams, J. G. K., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., & Tingey, S. V. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.22.6531 · Cited by 13,067
Vilgalys, R., & Hester, M. (1990) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 · Cited by 5,958
Self-citationFingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers
Welsh, J., & McClelland, M. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.24.7213 · Cited by 5,150
Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA
Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., & Thein, S. L. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/314067a0 · Cited by 3,741
Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting
Wetton, J. H., Carter, R. E., Parkin, D. T., & Walters, D. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/327147a0 · Cited by 808
Infections with Cryptococcus neoformans in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Chuck, S. L., & Sande, M. A. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198909213211205 · Cited by 797
A Sequence in M13 Phage Detects Hypervariable Minisatellites in Human and Animal DNA
Vassart, G., Georges, M., Monsieur, R., Brocas, H., Lequarre, A. S., & Christophe, D. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2880398 · Cited by 569
Kwon-Chung, K. J., Polacheck, I., & Bennett, J. E. (1982) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.15.3.535-537.1982 · Cited by 536
EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO VARIETIES OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS1
KWON-CHUNG, K. J., & BENNETT, J. E. (1984) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113861 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS--100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans
Mitchell, T. G., & Perfect, J. R. (1995) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.8.4.515 · Cited by 1,213
Self-citationShort-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes
van Belkum, A., Scherer, S., van Alphen, L., & Verbrugh, H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.2.275-293.1998 · Cited by 737
Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex
Hagen, F., Khayhan, K., Theelen, B., Kolecka, A., Polacheck, I., Sionov, E., Falk, R., Parnmen, S., Lumbsch, H. T., & Boekhout, T. (2015) · Fungal Genetics and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.009 · Cited by 687
An overview of molecular marker methods for plants
Semagn, K., Bjørnstad, Å., & Ndjiondjop, M. (2006) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY · doi:10.5897/ajb2006.000-5110 · Cited by 469
(2014) · doi:10.1128/cmr.00126-13 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, W., Mitchell, T. G., Freedman, E. Z., & Vilgalys, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2274-2280
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1536148864
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.31.9.2274-2280.1993
- The paper
- Meyer, W., Mitchell, T. G., Freedman, E. Z., & Vilgalys, R. (1993). Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.9.2274-2280.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.