Cited by 10Microplastics and Plastic PollutionMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular mechanisms of plastic biodegradation by the fungus Clonostachys rosea

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Microbial degradation can provide an avenue for the remediation of plastic pollution, contributing to the urgent environmental problem of global plastic waste. We demonstrate the degradation of polycaprolactone (PCL) by Clonostachys rosea and elucidate its underlying molecular mechanisms. We constructed the genome of this fungal strain and monitored changes in gene expression when exposed to PCL. Twelve genes linked to PCL degradation were found in the genome of C. rosea , and some of them were upregulated in the presence of the plastic, including genes coding for two cutinases. We heterologously expressed the enzymes coded by both genes and confirmed their activity against PCL polymers. We also demonstrate that one of the enzymes was active against polyethylene terephthalate polymers. Glucose inhibited the expression of both genes, completely halting the plastic biodegradation process, possibly serving as a preferred and readily metabolizable carbon source compared with PCL. We confirm the presence of key metabolic pathways linked to PCL degradation in C. rosea , including fatty acid degradation, providing further evidence of the mechanisms central to plastic biodegradation. IMPORTANCE: Plastic pollution is one of our most pressing environmental challenges, with billions of tons of plastic waste accumulating in our ecosystems. While recycling helps, it cannot fully address this crisis, making it crucial to find new solutions. Our study reveals how a common soil fungus, Clonostachys rosea , can break down certain plastics, specifically polycaprolactone and polyethylene terephthalate. We identified the exact genes and enzymes responsible for this ability and showed how different environmental conditions affect the fungus's plastic-degrading capabilities. Notably, we discovered that adding glucose completely stops the fungus from breaking down plastic, suggesting that careful control of growth conditions is essential for effective plastic degradation. These findings are significant because they provide a detailed blueprint for optimizing plastic biodegradation using fungi, potentially leading to more effective ways to tackle plastic pollution. This research represents a crucial step toward developing practical, environmentally friendly solutions for plastic waste management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.00335-25

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. 10.1016/S0025-326X(87)80019-X · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11270-014-2184-6 · DOI
  3. Anastasopoulou A, Fortibuoni T. 2022. Impact of plastic pollution on marine life in the Mediterranean Sea, p 135–196. In Stock F, Reifferscheid G, Brennholt N, Kostianaia E (ed), Plastics in the aquatic environment - part I: current status and challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
  4. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131090 · DOI
  5. 10.3354/ab00701 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-981-16-5403-9_15 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30140-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11356-021-18038-5 · DOI
  9. 10.3390/jmse8110945 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143536 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.3390/microorganisms10061180 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107501 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s13762-013-0220-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1081/ESE-100108480 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.06.002 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0964-8305(94)90030-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/mSystems.01112-20 · DOI
  18. 10.1155/2016/9519527 · DOI
  19. 10.3390/microorganisms7090304 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00521967 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.08.009 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/aem.62.2.456-460.1996 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7548-7550.2005 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/bm049395v · DOI
  25. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01961.x · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s13568-017-0448-4 · DOI
  27. Bainier G. 1907. Gliocladium roseum sp. nov. et Cephalosporium acremonium (Corda). Bull Soc Mycol France 23:111–114.
  28. 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061028 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0953756202006822 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01228.x · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s11274-012-1057-7 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/jam.14625 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/gbe/evu292 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/srep18169 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s10529-013-1225-3 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/1616-5195(20010601)1:4<136::AID-MABI136>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10924-018-1307-3 · DOI
  38. 10.3390/md20120760 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/s41598-020-79031-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 · DOI
  46. 10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7 · DOI
  47. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.1028 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/nar/gkl200 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/nar/gkt1223 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/nar/gks1234 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z · DOI
  56. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Core Team RD. 2023. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  63. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Alexa A, Rahnenführer J. 2009. Gene set enrichment analysis with topGO. Bioconductor Improv 27:1–26. https://doi.org/doi:10.18129/B9.bioc.topGO. · DOI
  65. 10.1093/database/baac008 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1093/nar/gkv1047 · DOI
  70. 10.5555/1593511 · DOI
  71. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x · DOI
  72. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-011 · DOI
  74. 10.1128/MMBR.62.2.334-361.1998 · DOI
  75. 10.1007/s00294-019-00996-6 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)88980-5 · DOI
  77. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac59a7 · DOI
  78. 10.1128/genomeA.00546-15 · DOI
  79. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02844 · DOI
  80. Astashyn A Tvedte ES Sweeney D Sapojnikov V Bouk N Joukov V Mozes E Strope PK Sylla PM Wagner L Bidwell SL Clark K Davis EW Smith-White B Hlavina W Pruitt KD Schneider VA Murphy TD. 2023. Rapid and sensitive detection of genome contamination at scale with FCS-GX. bioRxiv:2023.06.02.543519. doi:10.1101/2023.06.02.543519 · DOI
  81. 10.1007/s10930-019-09838-3 · DOI
  82. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. 2015. Molecular biology of the cell. Taylor and Francis group
  83. 10.1007/s10545-010-9061-2 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1007/978-3-319-39782-5_42-1 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129406 · DOI
  86. 10.1104/pp.75.1.151 · DOI
  87. 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01122.x · DOI
  88. 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5341-5347.2005 · DOI
  89. 10.1021/ma9005318 · DOI
  90. 10.1007/s00253-014-5672-0 · DOI
  91. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1113705 · DOI
  92. 10.3390/polym14030411 · DOI
  93. 10.1128/Spectrum.00976-21 · DOI
  94. 10.1007/s00253-014-6272-8 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.028 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gambarini, V., Pavlov, N., Young, P., Dawes, S., Auffret, A., Kingsbury, J. M., Donaldson, L. A., Smith, D. A., Weaver, L., Pantos, O., Handley, K. M., & Lear, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science (NZ)
  • Scion (NZ)
Corresponding author
Gambarini, Victor
Venue
mBio
Published
2025-08-13
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
e0033525-e0033525
ISSN
2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411811047
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • George Mason Centre for the Natural Environment, University of Auckland
  • Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (C03X1802, UOAX1916)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
plastic biodegradation, Clonostachys rosea, polycaprolactone, polyethylene terephthalate, cutinase, gene expression, glucose inhibition, fatty acid degradation, plastic pollution, fungal genome, heterologous expression
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases, Glucose, Hypocreales, Plastics, Polyesters, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review