Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biofilm Development on Urinary Catheters Promotes the Appearance of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria

Wilks, Sandra A., Koerfer, Verena V., Prieto, Jacqui A., Fader, Mandy, Keevil, C. William·2021·mBio
DOI 10.1128/mbio.03584-20

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Several antimicrobial urinary catheter materials have been developed, but, although laboratory studies may show a benefit, none have significantly improved clinical outcomes. The use of poorly designed laboratory testing and lack of consideration of the impact of VBNC populations may be responsible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.03584-20

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1001/archinte.160.17.2670 · DOI
  2. 10.1128/CMR.00019-07 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.041 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1128/JCM.05852-11 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00587.x · DOI
  6. 10.1099/jmm.0.47395-0 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.04.031 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00240-009-0176-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1099/jmm.0.012419-0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.009 · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.009
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141711 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141711
  12. 10.1016/j.urology.2011.02.063 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.037 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3201/eid0702.010240 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1128/AAC.43.12.2990 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s002840010105 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61380-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00258 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1128/JB.00249-18 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1128/mBio.00540-18 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1007/s00248-008-9472-x · DOI
  24. 10.1093/jac/dkt086 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s002849900064 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00240-X · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.7326/0003-4819-144-2-200601170-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1001/archinte.164.8.842 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.026 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.11.21227 · doi:10.12968/bjon.2006.15.11.21227
  32. 10.1007/pl00012151 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1128/AEM.61.7.2624-2630.1995 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1128/AEM.01378-09 · doi:10.1128/aem.01378-09
  35. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/1462-2920.14075 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1186/s12915-017-0465-4 · DOI
  38. 10.2166/wst.2003.0293 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03893.x · DOI
  40. 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4572-4579.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1997.00378.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Wilks, S. A., Koerfer, V. V., Prieto, J. A., Fader, M., & Keevil, C. W.
Affiliations
  • School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
ORCID
Venue
mBio
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Published
2021-04-27
Volume
12
Issue
2
ISSN
2150-7511
DOI
10.1128/mbio.03584-20
Cited by
44
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Universität Duisburg-Essen
  • University of Southampton

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm Development on Urinary Catheters Promotes the Appearance of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.03584-20
The paper
Wilks, S. A., Koerfer, V. V., Prieto, J. A., Fader, M., & Keevil, C. W. (2021). Biofilm Development on Urinary Catheters Promotes the Appearance of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03584-20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.