Cited by 52Muscle Physiology and DisordersEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseNutrition and Health in Aging

The Toll-Like Receptor/MyD88/XBP1 Signaling Axis Mediates Skeletal Muscle Wasting during Cancer Cachexia

Open access
Bohnert, Kyle R., Goli, Praneeth, Roy, Anirban, Sharma, Aditya K., Xiong, Guangyan, Gallot, Yann S., Kumar, Ashok·2019·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

Skeletal muscle wasting causes both morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that the markers of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways are increased in skeletal muscle under multiple catabolic conditions, including cancer. However, the signaling mechanisms and the role of individual arms of the UPR in the regulation of skeletal muscle mass remain largely unknown. In the present study, we demonstrated that gene expression of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) was increased in skeletal muscle in a Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) model of cancer cachexia. Targeted ablation of MyD88 inhibits the loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength in LLC tumor-bearing mice. Inhibition of MyD88 attenuates the LLC-induced activation of the UPR in skeletal muscle of mice. Moreover, muscle-specific deletion of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), a major downstream target of IRE1α arm of the UPR, ameliorates muscle wasting in LLC tumor-bearing mice. Our results also demonstrate that overexpression of an active form of XBP1 caused atrophy in cultured myotubes. In contrast, knockdown of XBP1 inhibits myotube atrophy in response to LLC or C26 adenocarcinoma cell conditioned medium. Collectively, our results demonstrate that TLR/MyD88-mediated activation of XBP1 causes skeletal muscle wasting in LLC tumor-bearing mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.00184-19

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohnert, K. R., Goli, P., Roy, A., Sharma, A. K., Xiong, G., Gallot, Y. S., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Ashok
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
39
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W2945774071
Cited by
52
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (AG029623)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR059810, AR068313)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
cancer cachexia, skeletal muscle atrophy, Toll-like receptors, MyD88, XBP1, unfolded protein response, endoplasmic reticulum stress, IRE1α, Lewis lung carcinoma, muscle atrophy, myotubes, tumor-conditioned medium, muscle strength
MeSH terms
X-Box Binding Protein 1, Animals, Cachexia, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Signal Transduction, Up-Regulation, Muscle, Skeletal, Carcinoma, Lewis Lung, Cell Line, Tumor, Toll-Like Receptors, Mice, Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88, Unfolded Protein Response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review