Cited by 55Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Epigenetic Regulation of Retrotransposons within the Nucleolus of Drosophila

Open access
Eickbush, Danna G., Ye, Junqiang, Zhang, Xian, Burke, William D., Eickbush, Thomas H.·2008·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

R2 retrotransposable elements exclusively insert into a conserved region of the tandemly organized 28S rRNA genes. Despite inactivating a subset of these genes, R2 elements have persisted in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci of insects for hundreds of millions of years. Controlling R2 proliferation was addressed in this study using lines of Drosophila simulans previously shown to have either active or inactive R2 retrotransposition. Lines with active retrotransposition were shown to have high R2 transcript levels, which nuclear run-on transcription experiments revealed were due to increased transcription of R2-inserted genes. Crosses between R2 active and inactive lines indicated that an important component of this transcriptional control is linked to or near the rDNA locus, with the R2 transcription level of the inactive parent being dominant. Pulsed-field gel analysis suggested that the R2 active and inactive states were determined by R2 distribution within the locus. Molecular and cytological analyses further suggested that the entire rDNA locus from the active line can be silenced in favor of the locus from the inactive line. This silencing of entire rDNA loci represents an example of the large-scale epigenetic control of transposable elements and shares features with the nucleolar dominance frequently seen in interspecies hybrids.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.01015-08

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eickbush, D. G., Ye, J., Zhang, X., Burke, W. D., & Eickbush, T. H.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
28
Issue
20
Pages
6452-6461
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W2038796249
Cited by
55
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 42790, R01GM042790)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
R2 retrotransposon, retrotransposition, epigenetic silencing, nucleolus, ribosomal DNA, 28S rRNA gene, Drosophila simulans, transposable element regulation, nucleolar dominance, dominant inheritance
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleolus, Crosses, Genetic, DNA, Ribosomal, Drosophila, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Mutation, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Retroelements, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review