The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural and Evolutionary Relationships among Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Domains
Open accessAbstract
With the current access to the whole genomes of various organisms and the completion of the first draft of the human genome, there is a strong need for a structure-function classification of protein families as an initial step in moving from DNA databases to a comprehensive understanding of human biology. As a result of the explosion in nucleic acid sequence information and the concurrent development of methods for high-throughput functional characterization of gene products, the genomic revolution also promises to provide a new paradigm for drug discovery, enabling the identification of molecular drug targets in a significant number of human diseases. This molecular view of diseases has contributed to the importance of combining primary sequence data with three-dimensional structure and has increased the awareness of computational homology modeling and its potential to elucidate protein function. In particular, when important proteins or novel therapeutic targets are identified—like the family of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) (reviewed in reference 53)—a structure-function classification of such protein families becomes an invaluable framework for further advances in biomedical science. Here, we present a comparative analysis of the structural relationships among vertebrate PTP domains and provide a comprehensive resource for sequence analysis of phosphotyrosine-specific PTPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Protein modules and signalling networks
Pawson, T. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373573a0 · Cited by 2,420
Cited by
Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation
Ubersax, J. A., & Ferrell Jr, J. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2203 · Cited by 1,451
ERM proteins and merlin: integrators at the cell cortex
Bretscher, A., Edwards, K., & Fehon, R. G. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm882 · Cited by 1,306
The ‘Shp'ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling
Neel, B. G., Gu, H., & Pao, L. (2003) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(03)00091-4 · Cited by 1,249
Reversible oxidation and inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in vivo
Meng, T.-C., Fukada, T., & Tonks, N. K. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00445-8 · Cited by 1,040
Self-citationInhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases: Next‐Generation Drugs?
Bialy, L., & Waldmann, H. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200461517 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, J. N., Mortensen, O. H., Peters, G. H., Drake, P. G., Iversen, L. F., Olsen, O. H., Jansen, P. G., Andersen, H. S., Tonks, N. K., & Møller, N. P. H.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7117-7136
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2098854471
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural and Evolutionary Relationships among Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.21.21.7117-7136.2001
- The paper
- Andersen, J. N., Mortensen, O. H., Peters, G. H., Drake, P. G., Iversen, L. F., Olsen, O. H., Jansen, P. G., Andersen, H. S., Tonks, N. K., & Møller, N. P. H. (2001). Structural and Evolutionary Relationships among Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Domains. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.21.21.7117-7136.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.