Cited by 79Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Candida auris cell wall mannosylation contributes to neutrophil evasion through pathways divergent from candida albicans and candida glabrata

Open access
Horton, Mark V., Johnson, Chad J., Zarnowski, Robert, Andes, Brody D., Schoen, Taylor J., Kernien, John F., Lowman, Douglas, Kruppa, Michael D. +4 more·2021·mSphere

Abstract

The emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris presents a global public health threat. Therapeutic options are often limited for this frequently drug-resistant pathogen, and mortality rates for invasive disease are high.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/msphere.00406-21

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in mannan composition between C. auris and C. albicans contribute to decreased innate immune recognition, phagocytic activity, and clearance of C. auris in human neutrophils.

    “Recent evidence indicates that differences in mannan composition between C. auris and C. albicans contribute to decreased innate immune recognition, phagocytic activity, and clearance of C. auris in human neutrophils (13, 27, 28).”

    From Differential skin immune responses in mice intradermally infected with <i>Candida auris</i> and <i>Candida albicans</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results report that disrupting C. auris mannosylation increased engagement, phagocytosis, and killing by human neutrophils; the Discussion says neutrophils engage C. albicans more readily than C. auris. However, the paper does not establish that differences in mannan composition *between the species* cause the difference in neutrophil recognition or clearance. Its proposed mechanism centers on C. auris mannan masking other cell-wall components. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased β-glucan in cell wall mannosylation mutant strains enhances neutrophil recruitment in a zebrafish infection model.

    “The increased β-glucan in the cell wall mannosylation mutant strains has been shown to enhance neutrophil recruitment in a zebrafish infection model (63)”

    From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results sections on cell-surface PAMPs and zebrafish recruitment report that C. auris pmr1Δ and van1Δ mutants expose more β-glucan and recruit more neutrophils to the larval zebrafish hindbrain than wild type. The paper also reports increased chitin exposure and does not show that β-glucan specifically caused the increased recruitment. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased β-glucan in cell wall mannosylation mutant strains is associated with enhanced fungal killing by neutrophils and macrophages.

    “was associated with enhanced fungal killing by neutrophils and macrophages (62, 63).”

    From The <i>Candida auris</i> Hog1 MAP kinase is essential for the colonization of murine skin and intradermal persistence (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Results sections on phagocytosis and cell-surface pathogen-associated molecular patterns report that C. auris mannosylation mutants expose more β-glucan and are more susceptible to killing by neutrophils. The zebrafish Results section reports similar macrophage recruitment to wild-type and mutant strains, but does not report enhanced killing by macrophages. The macrophage-killing part of the claim is therefore unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The mannan-IL-1Ra axis represents a critical checkpoint exploited by C. auris to persist in the skin.

    “This mannan-IL-1Ra axis represents a critical checkpoint exploited by C. auris to persist in the skin and a potential therapeutic target.”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says C. auris mannosylation protects it from neutrophil phagocytosis, supporting an immune-evasion role for mannan. The paper does not establish an IL-1Ra pathway or show that this mechanism enables persistence in skin; searches for IL-1Ra and skin persistence found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • C. auris uses a two-tiered evasion strategy: it masks immunogenic β-glucan through mannosylation to avoid neutrophil recognition and simultaneously induces macrophage-derived IL-1Ra to suppress IL-1R-dependent neutrophil recruitment and activation.

    “Together, these findings uncover a two-tiered evasion strategy: C. auris masks immunogenic β-glucan through mannosylation to avoid neutrophil recognition and simultaneously induces macrophage-derived IL-1Ra to suppress IL-1R-dependent neutrophil recruitment and activation.”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [87]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. [1]Rhodes J, Abdolrasouli A, Farrer RA, Cuomo CA, Aanensen DM, Armstrong-James D, Fisher MC, Schelenz S. 2018. Genomic epidemiology of the UK outbreak of the emerging human fungal pathogen Candida auris. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 43. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0045-x. 29593275 PMC5874254 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. 2009. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol 53: 41– 44. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x. 19161556 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, Abdolrasouli A, Chowdhary A, Hall A, Ryan L, Shackleton J, Trimlett R, Meis JF, Armstrong-James D, Fisher MC. 2016. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 5: 35. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0132-5. 27777756 PMC5069812 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Rudramurthy SM, Chakrabarti A, Paul RA, Sood P, Kaur H, Capoor MR, Kindo AJ, Marak RSK, Arora A, Sardana R, Das S, Chhina D, Patel A, Xess I, Tarai B, Singh P, Ghosh A. 2017. Candida auris candidaemia in Indian ICUs: analysis of risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother 72: 1794– 1801. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx034. 28333181 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Lamoth F, Kontoyiannis DP. 2018. The Candida auris alert: facts and perspectives. J Infect Dis 217: 516– 520. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix597. 29390110 · DOI
  6. [6]Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, Colombo AL, Calvo B, Cuomo CA, Desjardins CA, Berkow EL, Castanheira M, Magobo RE, Jabeen K, Asghar RJ, Meis JF, Jackson B, Chiller T, Litvintseva AP. 2017. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis 64: 134– 140. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw691. 27988485 PMC5215215 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]Mathur P, Hasan F, Singh PK, Malhotra R, Walia K, Chowdhary A. 2018. Five-year profile of candidaemia at an Indian trauma centre: High rates of Candida auris blood stream infections. Mycoses 61: 674– 680. doi: 10.1111/myc.12790. 29738604 · DOI
  8. [8]Lehrer RI, Cline MJ. 1969. Interaction of Candida albicans with human leukocytes and serum. J Bacteriol 98: 996– 1004. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.3.996-1004.1969. 4182532 PMC315286 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Mansour MK, Levitz SM. 2002. Interactions of fungi with phagocytes. Curr Opin Microbiol 5: 359– 365. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00342-9. 12160853 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]Urban CF, Reichard U, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. 2006. Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell Microbiol 8: 668– 676. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00659.x. 16548892 · DOI
  11. [11]Johnson CJ, Kernien JF, Hoyer AR, Nett JE. 2017. Mechanisms involved in the triggering of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by Candida glabrata during planktonic and biofilm growth. Sci Rep 7: 13065. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13588-6. 29026191 PMC5638821 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [12]Svobodova E, Staib P, Losse J, Hennicke F, Barz D, Jozsi M. 2012. Differential interaction of the two related fungal species Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis with human neutrophils. J Immunol 189: 2502– 2511. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200185. 22851712 · DOI
  13. [13]Branzk N, Lubojemska A, Hardison SE, Wang Q, Gutierrez MG, Brown GD, Papayannopoulos V. 2014. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat Immunol 15: 1017– 1025. doi: 10.1038/ni.2987. 25217981 PMC4236687 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [14]Johnson CJ, Davis JM, Huttenlocher A, Kernien JF, Nett JE. 2018. Emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris evades neutrophil attack. mBio 9: e01403-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01403-18. 30131360 PMC6106086 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [15]Hall RA, Gow NA. 2013. Mannosylation in Candida albicans: role in cell wall function and immune recognition. Mol Microbiol 90: 1147– 1161. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12426. 24125554 PMC4112839 · DOI
  16. [16]Ruiz-Herrera J, Elorza MV, Valentin E, Sentandreu R. 2006. Molecular organization of the cell wall of Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenicity. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 14– 29. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2005.00017.x. 16423067 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [17]Jungmann J, Munro S. 1998. Multi-protein complexes in the cis Golgi of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with alpha-1,6-mannosyltransferase activity. EMBO J 17: 423– 434. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.2.423. 9430634 PMC1170393 · DOI
  18. [18]Bates S, MacCallum DM, Bertram G, Munro CA, Hughes HB, Buurman ET, Brown AJ, Odds FC, Gow NA. 2005. Candida albicans Pmr1p, a secretory pathway P-type Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPase, is required for glycosylation and virulence. J Biol Chem 280: 23408– 23415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502162200. 15843378 · DOI
  19. [19]Grahl N, Demers EG, Crocker AW, Hogan DA. 2017. Use of RNA-protein complexes for genome editing in non-albicans Candida species. mSphere 2: e00218-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00218-17. 28657070 PMC5480035 · DOI
  20. [20]Navarro-Arias MJ, Hernandez-Chavez MJ, Garcia-Carnero LC, Amezcua-Hernandez DG, Lozoya-Perez NE, Estrada-Mata E, Martinez-Duncker I, Franco B, Mora-Montes HM. 2019. Differential recognition of Candida tropicalis, Candida guilliermondii, Candida krusei, and Candida auris by human innate immune cells. Infect Drug Resist 12: 783– 794. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S197531. 31040708 PMC6459152 · DOI
  21. [21]Ballou L, Hitzeman RA, Lewis MS, Ballou CE. 1991. Vanadate-resistant yeast mutants are defective in protein glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A 88: 3209– 3212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3209. PMC51415 2014241 · DOI
  22. [22]Ene IV, Walker LA, Schiavone M, Lee KK, Martin-Yken H, Dague E, Gow NA, Munro CA, Brown AJ. 2015. Cell wall remodeling enzymes modulate fungal cell wall elasticity and osmotic stress resistance. mBio 6: e00986. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00986-15. 26220968 PMC4551979 · DOI
  23. [23]Lenardon MD, Sood P, Dorfmueller HC, Brown AJP, Gow NAR. 2020. Scalar nanostructure of the Candida albicans cell wall; a molecular, cellular and ultrastructural analysis and interpretation. Cell Surf 6: 100047. doi: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100047. 33294751 PMC7691183 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [24]Shibata N, Suzuki A, Kobayashi H, Okawa Y. 2007. Chemical structure of the cell-wall mannan of Candida albicans serotype A and its difference in yeast and hyphal forms. Biochem J 404: 365– 372. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070081. 17331070 PMC1896289 · DOI
  25. [27]Hopke A, Nicke N, Hidu EE, Degani G, Popolo L, Wheeler RT. 2016. Neutrophil attack triggers extracellular trap-dependent Candida cell wall remodeling and altered immune recognition. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005644. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005644. 27223610 PMC4880299 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [28]Davis SE, Hopke A, Minkin SC, Jr, Montedonico AE, Wheeler RT, Reynolds TB. 2014. Masking of beta(1-3)-glucan in the cell wall of Candida albicans from detection by innate immune cells depends on phosphatidylserine. Infect Immun 82: 4405– 4413. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01612-14. 25114110 PMC4187869 · DOI
  27. [29]Wheeler RT, Kombe D, Agarwala SD, Fink GR. 2008. Dynamic, morphotype-specific Candida albicans beta-glucan exposure during infection and drug treatment. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000227. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000227. 19057660 PMC2587227 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [30]Nogueira F, Istel F, Jenull S, Walker L, Gow N, Lion T. 2017. Quantitative analysis of Candida cell wall components by flow cytometry with triple-fluorescence staining. J Microbiol Modern Tech 2: 101. doi: 10.15744/2575-5498.2.101. · DOI
  29. [31]El Gueddari NE, Rauchhaus U, Moerschbacher BM, Deising HB. 2002. Developmentally regulated conversion of surface-exposed chitin to chitosan in cell walls of plant pathogenic fungi. New Phytol 156: 103– 112. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00487.x. · DOI
  30. [32]Knox BP, Deng Q, Rood M, Eickhoff JC, Keller NP, Huttenlocher A. 2014. Distinct innate immune phagocyte responses to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia and hyphae in zebrafish larvae. Eukaryot Cell 13: 1266– 1277. doi: 10.1128/EC.00080-14. 24879123 PMC4187654 · DOI
  31. [33]Schoen TJ, Rosowski EE, Knox BP, Bennin D, Keller NP, Huttenlocher A. 2019. Neutrophil phagocyte oxidase activity controls invasive fungal growth and inflammation in zebrafish. J Cell Sci 133: jcs236539. doi: 10.1242/jcs.236539. 31722976 PMC7055366 · DOI
  32. [34]Brothers KM, Newman ZR, Wheeler RT. 2011. Live imaging of disseminated candidiasis in zebrafish reveals role of phagocyte oxidase in limiting filamentous growth. Eukaryot Cell 10: 932– 944. doi: 10.1128/EC.05005-11. 21551247 PMC3147414 · DOI
  33. [35]Barros-Becker F, Lam PY, Fisher R, Huttenlocher A. 2017. Live imaging reveals distinct modes of neutrophil and macrophage migration within interstitial tissues. J Cell Sci 130: 3801– 3808. doi: 10.1242/jcs.206128. 28972134 PMC5702045 · DOI
  34. [36]Lam PY, Yoo SK, Green JM, Huttenlocher A. 2012. The SH2-domain-containing inositol 5-phosphatase (SHIP) limits the motility of neutrophils and their recruitment to wounds in zebrafish. J Cell Sci 125: 4973– 4978. doi: 10.1242/jcs.106625. 22946052 PMC3533387 · DOI
  35. [37]Deng Q, Yoo SK, Cavnar PJ, Green JM, Huttenlocher A. 2011. Dual roles for Rac2 in neutrophil motility and active retention in zebrafish hematopoietic tissue. Dev Cell 21: 735– 745. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.013. 22014524 PMC3199325 · DOI
  36. [38]Erwig LP, Gow NA. 2016. Interactions of fungal pathogens with phagocytes. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 163– 176. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.21. 26853116 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [39]Gazendam RP, van Hamme JL, Tool AT, van Houdt M, Verkuijlen PJ, Herbst M, Liese JG, van de Veerdonk FL, Roos D, van den Berg TK, Kuijpers TW. 2014. Two independent killing mechanisms of Candida albicans by human neutrophils: evidence from innate immunity defects. Blood 124: 590– 597. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-551473. 24948657 · DOI
  38. [40]O'Brien XM, Heflin KE, Lavigne LM, Yu K, Kim M, Salomon AR, Reichner JS. 2012. Lectin site ligation of CR3 induces conformational changes and signaling. J Biol Chem 287: 3337– 3348. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.298307. 22158618 PMC3270988 · DOI
  39. [41]Bruno M, Kersten S, Bain JM, Jaeger M, Rosati D, Kruppa MD, Lowman DW, Rice PJ, Graves B, Ma Z, Jiao YN, Chowdhary A, Renieris G, van de Veerdonk FL, Kullberg BJ, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Hoischen A, Gow NAR, Brown AJP, Meis JF, Williams DL, Netea MG. 2020. Transcriptional and functional insights into the host immune response against the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris. Nat Microbiol 5: 1516– 1531. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0780-3. 32839538 PMC9204844 · DOI · Paper page
  40. [42]Bhattacharya S, Holowka T, Orner EP, Fries BC. 2019. Gene duplication associated with increased fluconazole tolerance in Candida auris cells of advanced generational age. Sci Rep 9: 5052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41513-6. 30911079 PMC6434143 · DOI
  41. [43]Hopke A, Scherer A, Kreuzburg S, Abers MS, Zerbe CS, Dinauer MC, Mansour MK, Irimia D. 2020. Neutrophil swarming delays the growth of clusters of pathogenic fungi. Nat Commun 11: 2031. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15834-4. 32341348 PMC7184738 · DOI
  42. [44]Sanches JM, Rossato L, Lice I, Alves de Piloto Fernandes AM, Bueno Duarte GH, Rosini Silva AA, de Melo Porcari A, de Oliveira Carvalho P, Gil CD. 2021. The role of annexin A1 in Candida albicans and Candida auris infections in murine neutrophils. Microb Pathog 150: 104689. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104689. 33307121 · DOI
  43. [45]Negoro PE, Xu S, Dagher Z, Hopke A, Reedy JL, Feldman MB, Khan NS, Viens AL, Alexander NJ, Atallah NJ, Scherer AK, Dutko RA, Jeffery J, Kernien JF, Fites JS, Nett JE, Klein BS, Vyas JM, Irimia D, Sykes DB, Mansour MK. 2020. Spleen tyrosine kinase is a critical regulator of neutrophil responses to Candida species. mBio 11: e02043-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02043-19. PMC7218286 32398316 · DOI
  44. [46]Torres SR, Pichowicz A, Torres-Velez F, Song R, Singh N, Lasek-Nesselquist E, De Jesus M. 2020. Impact of Candida auris infection in a neutropenic murine model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64: e01625-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01625-19. 31818824 PMC7038241 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [47]van Bruggen R, Drewniak A, Jansen M, van Houdt M, Roos D, Chapel H, Verhoeven AJ, Kuijpers TW. 2009. Complement receptor 3, not Dectin-1, is the major receptor on human neutrophils for beta-glucan-bearing particles. Mol Immunol 47: 575– 581. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.09.018. 19811837 · DOI
  46. [48]Yoo SK, Starnes TW, Deng Q, Huttenlocher A. 2011. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature 480: 109– 112. doi: 10.1038/nature10632. 22101434 PMC3228893 · DOI
  47. [49]Sheth CC, Hall R, Lewis L, Brown AJ, Odds FC, Erwig LP, Gow NA. 2011. Glycosylation status of the C. albicans cell wall affects the efficiency of neutrophil phagocytosis and killing but not cytokine signaling. Med Mycol 49: 513– 524. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.551425. 21254968 PMC3119872 · DOI
  48. [50]Johnson CJ, Cabezas-Olcoz J, Kernien JF, Wang SX, Beebe DJ, Huttenlocher A, Ansari H, Nett JE. 2016. The extracellular matrix of Candida albicans biofilms impairs formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005884. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005884. 27622514 PMC5021349 · DOI
  49. [51]Mitchell KF, Zarnowski R, Sanchez H, Edward JA, Reinicke EL, Nett JE, Mitchell AP, Andes DR. 2015. Community participation in biofilm matrix assembly and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 4092– 4097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421437112. 25770218 PMC4386410 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [52]Dominguez E, Zarnowski R, Sanchez H, Covelli AS, Westler WM, Azadi P, Nett J, Mitchell AP, Andes DR. 2018. Conservation and divergence in the Candida species biofilm matrix mannan-glucan complex structure, function, and genetic control. mBio 9: e00451-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00451-18. 29615504 PMC5885036 · DOI · Paper page
  51. [53]Min K, Ichikawa Y, Woolford CA, Mitchell AP. 2016. Candida albicans gene deletion with a transient CRISPR-Cas9 system. mSphere 1: e00130-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00130-16. 27340698 PMC4911798 · DOI
  52. [54]Basso LR, Jr, Bartiss A, Mao Y, Gast CE, Coelho PS, Snyder M, Wong B. 2010. Transformation of Candida albicans with a synthetic hygromycin B resistance gene. Yeast 27: 1039– 1048. doi: 10.1002/yea.1813. 20737428 PMC4243612 · DOI
  53. [55]Xu S, Feliu M, Lord AK, Lukason DP, Negoro PE, Khan NS, Dagher Z, Feldman MB, Reedy JL, Steiger SN, Tam JM, Soukas AA, Sykes DB, Mansour MK. 2018. Biguanides enhance antifungal activity against Candida glabrata. Virulence 9: 1150– 1162. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1475798. 29962263 PMC6086317 · DOI
  54. [56]Nett J, Lincoln L, Marchillo K, Massey R, Holoyda K, Hoff B, VanHandel M, Andes D. 2007. Putative role of beta-1,3 glucans in Candida albicans biofilm resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 510– 520. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01056-06. 17130296 PMC1797745 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [58]Blakeney AB, Harris PJ, Henry RJ, Stone BA, Norris T. 1982. Gas chromatography of alditol acetates on a high-polarity bonded-phase vitreous-silica column. J Chromatography A 249: 180– 182. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)80246-0. · DOI
  56. [59]Lowman DW, Ensley HE, Greene RR, Knagge KJ, Williams DL, Kruppa MD. 2011. Mannan structural complexity is decreased when Candida albicans is cultivated in blood or serum at physiological temperature. Carbohydr Res 346: 2752– 2759. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.09.029. 22030461 PMC3221800 · DOI
  57. [60]Huemer K, Squirrell JM, Swader R, LeBert DC, Huttenlocher A, Eliceiri KW. 2017. zWEDGI: wounding and entrapment device for imaging live zebrafish larvae. Zebrafish 14: 42– 50. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2016.1323. 27676647 PMC5312606 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horton, M. V., Johnson, C. J., Zarnowski, R., Andes, B. D., Schoen, T. J., Kernien, J. F., Lowman, D., Kruppa, M. D., Ma, Z., Williams, D. L., Huttenlocher, A., & Nett, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA<?A3B2 show [zaq no="AQGRid1"]?>
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Corresponding author
Nett, Jeniel E.
Venue
mSphere
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e0040621-e0040621
ISSN
2379-5042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177114916
Cited by
79
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mSphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1012299)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2017074)
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (R01AI145939, R21AI159583, R01GM083016, R01GM119197, R21AI15988, T32AI55397)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida auris, neutrophil phagocytosis, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, fungal pathogenesis, drug resistance, invasive fungal infections
MeSH terms
Candida auris, Animals, Candida albicans, Cell Wall, Mannans, Neutrophils, Phagocytosis, Virulence, Zebrafish, Candida glabrata, Immune Evasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review