Skin-resident T cells play an important role in controlling skin colonization of Candidozyma (Candida) auris
Open accessAbstract
skin colonization.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In mouse topical colonization models, skin-resident T cells, rather than infiltrating T cells, play the dominant role in controlling *Candidozyma (Candida) auris* skin colonization. CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells and CD8+ skin-resident T cells are important, with both IL-17-dependent and IL-17-independent mechanisms implicated.
Key findings
- FTY720 blockade of lymphocyte infiltration reduced skin γδT17 and CD8+ Tc17 cells but did not significantly change *C. auris* burdens after 1× or 2× topical application; after 2× applications, burdens were >20-fold lower than after 1×.
- CCR10^EGFP/EGFP mice had increased *C. auris* skin colonization on day 6 after 1× application despite enhanced IL-17A+ CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses and more severe skin inflammation; by day 13, *C. auris* levels were similarly low in CCR10^+/EGFP and CCR10^EGFP/EGFP mice.
- Anti-IL-17A antibody treatment increased *C. auris* burdens in both CCR10^+/EGFP and CCR10^EGFP/EGFP mice, indicating IL-17A responses help compensate but are not sufficient.
- FTY720-treated CD8-KO mice had significantly higher *C. auris* skin burdens than WT mice despite compensatory increases in CD4+ αβT cells, implicating skin-resident CD8+ T cells.
Methods
- Mouse topical *C. auris* colonization: C57BL/6 WT, CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI, and CD8a-KO mice; shaved back skin; 1 × 10^9 *C. auris* cells (CDC #0383, African Clade) per application; 1×, 2×, or 4× every-other-day schemes; analysis on day 6 or 13.
- Immune cells analyzed by flow cytometry after skin digestion and Percoll enrichment; fungal burden quantified by plating skin digests on CHROMagar Candida plates with PCR verification; FTY720 given at 1 mg/kg i.p. daily; anti-IL-17A given at 5 mg/kg before and 3 days after application.
- Statistics: unpaired t test; data presented as mean ± SD; N = 5–10 depending on experiment.
Limitations
- Stated: all experiments used a single *C. auris* strain (CDC #0383, African Clade), limiting extrapolation to other clades/strains; CCR10 may regulate non-T skin cells, so cell-specific CCR10-KO mice are needed; germline CD8a deletion may confound results, and inducible CD8+ T cell knockout would be more precise; other immune populations (DCs, macrophages, mast cells, neutrophils) were not addressed; findings need verification in human subsets.
- Evident from the text: the study is mouse-only; IL-17-independent effector molecules remain unidentified; commensal bacteria were not experimentally controlled and may influence *C. auris* levels.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
26 of 35 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Homozygous CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI mice have dysregulated skin-resident T cells compared to heterozygous mice, characterized mostly by reduction of CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells but not IL-17A+ αβT or γδT cells.
“Homozygous CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI (CCR10EGFP/EGFP, or CCR10−/− for simplicity) mice have dysregulated skin-resident T cells compared to heterozygous CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI (CCR10+/EGFP or CCR10+/−) mice, characterized mostly by the reduction of CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells but not IL-17A+ αβT or γδT cells.20,22,23”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Xia, 2014, CCR10 regulates balanced maintenance and function of resident regulatory and effector T cells to promote immune homeostasis in the skin, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. source
The Results section on imbalanced maintenance reports fewer skin CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells in CCR10−/− mice than in heterozygous controls. It also reports more γδT cells in the dermis, but does not establish that γδT cells are not reduced across the skin as a whole. The impaired immune homeostasis section reports a higher percentage of IL-17A+ CD4+ cells, not whether their absolute number is unchanged. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Jin, 2010, CCR10 is important for the development of skin-specific gammadeltaT cells by regulating their migration and location, J. Immunol. source
The Results sections on defective sIEL development and dermal accumulation report fewer epidermal Vγ3+ γδ T cells in CCR10-knockout mice and altered distribution of those cells within the skin—the opposite of the claim that γδ T cells were not reduced or dysregulated. The comparisons reported there are with wild-type controls, not heterozygous mice; these passages do not establish the claimed predominant loss of CD4+ and CD8+ αβ T cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Cai, 2014, Differential developmental requirement and peripheral regulation for dermal Vgamma4 and Vgamma6T17 cells in health and inflammation, Nat. Commun. source
The Results section, ‘Thymic Vγ4 requires extrathymic environment for skin homing’ (page unavailable), reports that CCR10 deficiency did not reduce dermal Vγ4 cells relative to wild-type mice and that total dermal γδT-cell frequency was unchanged. The paper does not report the claimed reductions in CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells or compare homozygous CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI mice with heterozygous mice. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
IL-17-producing cells could exert effects in controlling C. auris colonization through IL-17-induced signals on skin keratinocytes to promote production of antimicrobial peptides.
“IL-17-producing cells could exert their effects in controlling C. auris colonization through IL-17-induced signals on skin keratinocytes to promote the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs).6,16”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Huang, 2021, Murine model of colonization with fungal pathogen Candida auris to explore skin tropism, host risk factors and therapeutic strategies, Cell Host Microbe source
- cites [16] Lionakis, 2023, Immune responses to human fungal pathogens and therapeutic prospects, Nat. Rev. Immunol. source
The Introduction reports that IL-17A and IL-17F from lymphocytes curtailed C. auris skin colonization in a mouse model. The Mucocutaneous candidiasis section says IL-17 signaling induces antimicrobial peptides in epithelial cells during mucosal Candida infection, but it does not establish that this mechanism operates through skin keratinocytes during C. auris colonization. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Immune responses can control and eventually clear C. auris in immunocompetent hosts.
“Immune responses can control and eventually clear C. auris in immunocompetent hosts.3,10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Lionakis, 2024, Candida auris Infections, N. Engl. J. Med. source
- cites [10] Holt, 2024, Innate immune response to Candida auris, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. source
The ‘Phagocyte responses to C. auris’ section says neutrophils help control infection in mice. It does not establish eventual clearance in immunocompetent hosts; the same section reports that C. auris can persist despite intact immunity. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
C. auris induces weaker IL-17+ T cell responses than C. albicans does in an intradermal infection model of mice.
“C. auris induces weaker IL-17+ T cell responses than C. albicans does in an intradermal infection model of mice,17 which might partially explain its prolonged skin colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Datta, 2023, Differential skin immune responses in mice intradermally infected with Candida auris and Candida albicans, Microbiol. Spectr. source
- Premisecitation
Over-active IL-17A+ T cell responses also increase skin inflammation in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice in an imiquimod-induced model of psoriasis.
“Consistent with this finding, we previously found that over-active IL-17A+ T cell responses also increase skin inflammation in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice in an imiquimod-induced model of psoriasis.44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Li, 2021, Psoriasis-associated impairment of CCL27/CCR10-derived regulation leads to IL-17A/IL-22-producing skin T-cell overactivation, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. source
- Findingown data
In the 4× repeated topical C. auris colonization scheme, WT mice consistently had greatly reduced levels of the same strain of C. auris in the skin compared to those previously reported.
“In fact, in our experiments of the 4× repeated topical C. auris colonization scheme, we consistently obtained greatly reduced levels of the same strain of C. auris in the skin of WT mice compared to those previously reported.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Huang, 2021, Murine model of colonization with fungal pathogen Candida auris to explore skin tropism, host risk factors and therapeutic strategies, Cell Host Microbe source
- Premisecitation
IL-17A can stimulate the production of antimicrobial peptides of skin keratinocytes to inhibit C. auris colonization.
“IL-17A can stimulate the production of AMPs of skin keratinocytes to inhibit C. auris colonization.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Huang, 2021, Murine model of colonization with fungal pathogen Candida auris to explore skin tropism, host risk factors and therapeutic strategies, Cell Host Microbe source
The Results report that an IL-17A/IL-17F–IL-17R response helps control C. auris skin colonization. The Discussion proposes that this protection occurs *likely* through antifungal antimicrobial peptide production by keratinocytes; it does not establish that IL-17A specifically stimulates that production. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The C-type lectin receptor adaptor molecule Card9 promotes IL-17+ T cell responses to some fungal pathogens but not to C. auris.
“The C-type lectin receptor adaptor molecule Card9 was found to promote IL-17+ T cell responses to some fungal pathogens but not to C. auris,6,34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [6] Huang, 2021, Murine model of colonization with fungal pathogen Candida auris to explore skin tropism, host risk factors and therapeutic strategies, Cell Host Microbe source
The Results section says Card9 promotes Th17-cell induction in certain C. albicans infections and after cutaneous Malassezia challenge. For C. auris, Card9-deficient mice controlled skin colonization similarly to wild-type mice, which the authors say suggests Card9-related signaling may not contribute to the overall cutaneous IL-17 response. They do not directly establish that Card9 fails to promote IL-17+ T-cell responses to C. auris, so the claim is more definite and cell-specific than the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [34] LeibundGut-Landmann, 2007, Syk- and CARD9-dependent coupling of innate immunity to the induction of T helper cells that produce interleukin 17, Nat. Immunol. source
- Premisecitation
FTY720 blocks migration of T cells and ILCs from circulation into the skin by impairing S1PR1-mediated signals.
“FTY720 blocks the migration of T cells and ILCs from circulation into the skin by impairing sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1)-mediated signals.18,19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Cyster, 2005, Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs, Annu. Rev. Immunol. source
- cites [19] Yang, 2016, Selective programming of CCR10(+) innate lymphoid cells in skin-draining lymph nodes for cutaneous homeostatic regulation, Nat. Immunol. source
In Results (‘Predominant migration of CCR10+MHCII+ ILCs of sLN into the skin’; page unavailable), FTY720-treated mice had fewer CCR10+ ILCs and T cells in skin and more in skin-draining lymph nodes. This supports reduced skin presence of those cells, but the paper describes input from lymph nodes rather than directly demonstrating blocked migration from circulation, and it does not establish an S1PR1-mediated mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Only a low number of C. auris were detected in the skin of C. auris-colonized mice.
“Only a low number of C. auris were detected in the skin (Figure S1B), consistent with the notion that activated immune cells, including IL-17-producing cells, efficiently control C. auris skin colonization.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of C. auris in the skin was drastically lower 6 days after 2× applications than after 1× application.
“The number of C. auris in the skin was drastically lower 6 days after 2× applications than after 1× application (Figure 1B), suggesting that immune cells activated by the first C. auris application provide efficient control against colonization of the second C. auris application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CD8+ skin-resident T cells are an important T cell population in controlling C. auris colonization.
“Furthermore, we identified CD8+ skin-resident T cells as an important T cell population in controlling C. auris colonization.”
- Also stated in: § Skin-resident CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling C. auris colonization · boosted
“These results demonstrated that skin-resident CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Skin-resident CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling C. auris colonization · boosted
- Findingown data
CCR10-knockout mice defective in the homeostatic establishment of skin-resident T cells had increased C. auris skin colonization despite enhanced IL-17+ T cell responses.
“On the other hand, CCR10-knockout mice defective in the homeostatic establishment of skin-resident T cells had increased C. auris skin colonization despite enhanced IL-17+ T cell responses.”
- Also stated in: § CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells play an important role in controlling skin colonization of C. auris in an IL-17-independent fashion · plain
“However, despite their enhanced IL-17A+ T cell responses, CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had significantly higher levels of C. auris in the skin than their CCR10+/EGFP littermate controls (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells play an important role in controlling skin colonization of C. auris in an IL-17-independent fashion · plain
- Findingown data
There were differentially increased responses of IL-17A+ γδT, CD4+ and CD8+ αβT, and ILCs in the skin of C. auris-colonized mice compared to uninfected naive mice.
“There were differentially increased responses of IL-17A+ CD3medium+ γδT (γδT17) cells, CD4+ and CD8+ αβT (Th17 and Tc17) cells, and ILCs (ILC3s) in the skin of C. auris-colonized mice compared to those in uninfected naive mice (Figure S1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were increased percentages of IFNγ+ αβT cells associated with decreased percentages of IL-17A+ αβT cells, particularly in CD8+ αβT cells, at the later time point.
“there were increased percentages of IFNγ+ αβT cells associated with decreased percentages of IL-17A+ αβT cells, particularly in CD8+ αβT cells, at the later time point (Figures 1E and 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inhibition of T cell infiltration into the skin had little effect on C. auris colonization.
“We found that the inhibition of T cell infiltration into the skin had little effect on C. auris colonization.”
- Also stated in: § Blockage of T cell infiltration into the skin by FTY720 does not significantly affect host regulation of C. auris colonization · plain
“there was no statistical difference in levels of C. auris in the skin of FTY720- vs. PBS-treated mice (Figure 2E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Blockage of T cell infiltration into the skin by FTY720 does not significantly affect host regulation of C. auris colonization · plain
- Findingown data
There were increased percentages of IL-17A+ ILCs at the later time point.
“On the other hand, there were increased percentages of IL-17A+ ILCs at the later time point (Figures 1E and 1F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in percentages of total, IL-17A+ or IFNγ+ γδT, CD8+ αβT, CD4+ αβT cells in FTY720- vs PBS-treated mice 6 days after 2× applications.
“There were no significant differences in percentages of total, IL-17A+ or IFNγ+ γδT, CD8+ αβT, CD4+ αβT cells in FTY720- vs. PBS-treated mice 6 days after 2× applications (Figures 2F–2H)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were highly increased levels of C. auris in the skin of anti-IL-17A antibody-treated CCR10+/EGFP and CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice.
“Associated with the neutralization of IL-17A and reduction of IL-17A+ T cells, there were highly increased levels of C. auris in the skin of anti-IL-17A antibody-treated CCR10+/EGFP and CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice (Figure 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Anti-IL-17A antibody-treated CCR10+/EGFP and CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had increased percentages of IFNγ+ subsets in γδT, CD8+ αβT, CD4+ αβT cells, and ILCs compared to untreated mice.
“On the other hand, anti-IL-17A antibody-treated CCR10+/EGFP and CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had increased percentages of IFNγ+ subsets in γδT, CD8+ αβT, CD4+ αβT cells, and ILCs compared to untreated mice (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IL-17A+ T cells are dominant at early time points after 1× C. auris colonization.
“We found that while IL-17A+ T cells are dominant at early time points after 1× C. auris colonization, there are increased percentages of IFNγ+ T cells at a later time point after repeated C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Percentages of IL-17A+ CD4+ αβT cells, γδT cells, and ILCs in the skin of CD8-KO mice were similar to those of WT controls.
“Percentages of IL-17A+ CD4+ αβT cells, γδT cells, and ILCs in the skin of CD8-KO mice were similar to those of WT controls (Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C. auris-colonized CCR10-KO mice have increased skin inflammation.
“Our finding of increased skin inflammation in C. auris-colonized CCR10-KO mice provides evidence supporting the association of dysregulated immune responses to fungal pathogen infections and development of skin inflammatory diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There are different skin T cell responses after one vs. repeated C. auris topical applications.
“There are different skin T cell responses after one vs. repeated C. auris topical applications, suggesting that kinetic T cell responses are associated with C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no statistical difference in total, IL-17A+ or IFNγ+ ILCs in FTY720-treated and control mice.
“There was no statistical difference in total, IL-17A+ or IFNγ+ ILCs in FTY720-treated and control mice (Figures 2B–2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CD8-KO mice had significantly higher levels of C. auris in the skin than WT mice even with compensatorily increased CD4+ T cells.
“However, even with the compensatorily increased CD4+ T cells, CD8-KO mice had significantly higher levels of C. auris in the skin than WT mice (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CCR10EGFP/EGFP littermates had significantly reduced percentages of IFNγ+ CD8+ and CD4+ skin T cells compared to CCR10+/EGFP mice.
“Compared to CCR10+/EGFP mice, CCR10EGFP/EGFP littermates had significantly reduced percentages of IFNγ+ CD8+ and CD4+ skin T cells (Figures 3A and 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On day 6 after 1× C. auris application, FTY720-treated mice had significantly reduced percentages of CD3medium+ γδT cells compared to control PBS-treated mice.
“On day 6 after 1× C. auris application, FTY720-treated mice had significantly reduced percentages of CD3medium+ γδT cells, which included most γδT17 cells, compared to control PBS-treated mice (Figures 2B and 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There are increased percentages of IFNγ+ T cells at a later time point after repeated C. auris colonization.
“We found that while IL-17A+ T cells are dominant at early time points after 1× C. auris colonization, there are increased percentages of IFNγ+ T cells at a later time point after repeated C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Anti-IL-17A antibody treatment reduced percentages of IL-17A+ γδT, CD8+ αβT, CD4+ αβT cells in CCR10+/EGFP and CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice compared to untreated mice.
“CCR10+/EGFP and CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice treated with anti-IL-17A antibodies both had reduced percentages of IL-17A+ γδT, CD8+ αβT, CD4+ αβT cells to various degrees compared to untreated mice (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had significantly higher levels of C. auris in the skin than their CCR10+/EGFP littermate controls despite enhanced IL-17A+ T cell responses.
“However, despite their enhanced IL-17A+ T cell responses, CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had significantly higher levels of C. auris in the skin than their CCR10+/EGFP littermate controls (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On day 6 after 1× topical C. auris application, about half of IFNγ+ skin CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells of CCR10+/EGFP mice expressed CCR10(EGFP) while they had few IFNγ+ γδT cells or ILCs.
“On day 6 after 1× topical C. auris application, about half of IFNγ+ skin CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells of CCR10+/EGFP mice expressed CCR10(EGFP) while they had few IFNγ+ γδT cells or ILCs (Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C. auris levels on day 6 after 2× applications were greatly reduced (>20-fold) from levels on day 6 after 1× application in both FTY720- and PBS-treated mice.
“they were both greatly reduced (>20-fold) from levels of C. auris on day 6 after 1× application (Figures 2I vs. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had increased IL-17A+ T cell responses compared to CCR10+/EGFP littermate mice on day 13.
“Similar to results on day 6 after 1× application, CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice also had increased IL-17A+ T cell responses compared to CCR10+/EGFP littermate mice on day 13 (Figure S2D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had more severe skin inflammation than CCR10+/EGFP mice.
“Associated with the increased IL-17+ T cell responses, CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice had more severe skin inflammation than CCR10+/EGFP mice (Figures S2A–S2C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were significantly higher percentages of IL-17A+ cells in every T cell subset (γδT, CD8+ αβT, and CD4+ αβT) in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice than in CCR10+/EGFP mice on day 13.
“there were significantly higher percentages of IL-17A+ cells in every T cell subset (γδT, CD8+ αβT, and CD4+ αβT) in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice than in CCR10+/EGFP mice (Figure S2D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
FTY720-treated mice had decreased percentages of IL-17A+ skin αβT cells, particularly in the CD8+ subset, compared to PBS-treated mice.
“In addition, FTY720-treated mice had decreased percentages of IL-17A+ skin αβT cells, particularly in the CD8+ subset, compared to PBS-treated mice (Figure 2C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no statistical difference in levels of C. auris in the skin of FTY720- vs PBS-treated mice on day 6 after 1× application.
“there was no statistical difference in levels of C. auris in the skin of FTY720- vs. PBS-treated mice (Figure 2E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Percentages of IFNγ+ CD4+ αβT cells, γδT cells, and ILCs were similar in CD8-KO and WT mice.
“Percentages of IFNγ+ CD4+ αβT cells, γδT cells, and ILCs were also similar in CD8-KO and WT mice (Figure 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Immune cells activated by the first C. auris application provide efficient control against colonization of the second C. auris application.
“suggesting that immune cells activated by the first C. auris application provide efficient control against colonization of the second C. auris application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Skin-resident but not infiltrating T cells play a dominant role in controlling C. auris skin colonization.
“Together, our findings reveal that skin-resident but not infiltrating T cells play a dominant role in controlling C. auris skin colonization.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“we found that skin-resident, but not infiltrating, T cells play a major role in controlling C. auris skin colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Interpretationown data
Enhanced IL-17A+ T cell responses in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice catch up at the later time point in controlling C. auris colonization.
“These results suggest that the enhanced IL-17A+ T cell responses in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice catch up at the later time point in controlling C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Responses of skin-resident T cells play a dominant role in controlling C. auris colonization in the skin.
“These results further confirmed that responses of skin-resident T cells play a dominant role in controlling C. auris colonization in the skin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells play an important role in restricting early colonization of C. auris in the skin, independent of IL-17 responses.
“These results suggest that CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells play an important role in restricting the early colonization of C. auris in the skin, independent of IL-17 responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Infiltrating γδT17 cells accounted for about half of total γδT17 cells in skin colonized by C. auris.
“This result suggests that infiltrating γδT17 cells accounted for about half of the total γδT17 cells in the skin colonized by C. auris.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Responses of skin-resident, but not infiltrating, T cells play a critical role in controlling early colonization of C. auris.
“revealing that responses of skin-resident, but not infiltrating, T cells play a critical role in controlling early colonization of C. auris.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A significant fraction of Tc17 cells migrated into the skin in response to C. auris colonization.
“suggesting that a significant fraction of Tc17 cells also migrated into the skin in response to C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Experiments using CCR10-KO mice provided strong evidence supporting the roles of CCR10-regulated skin-resident T cells in controlling C. auris colonization.
“In addition, while our experiments using CCR10-KO mice provided strong evidence supporting the roles of CCR10-regulated skin-resident T cells in controlling C. auris colonization, it is possible that CCR10 could regulate other cells of the skin in addition to T cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Innate responses of skin-resident T cells play a dominant role in controlling early C. auris colonization.
“Particularly, while our current study suggests that innate responses of skin-resident T cells play a dominant role in controlling early C. auris colonization, it is possible that antigen-specific T responses might play a more important role against re-infection after C. auris-specific skin-resident memory T cells are established in response to primary C. auris infection or immunization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Over-active IL-17A+ T cell responses cause more severe skin inflammatory symptoms in C. auris-colonized CCR10-KO mice.
“In CCR10-KO mice that are deficient of skin-resident T cells, there is compensatorily enhanced activation of IL-17A+ T cells to help control C. auris colonization but the over-active IL-17A+ T cell responses also cause more severe skin inflammatory symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Kinetic T cell responses are associated with C. auris colonization.
“suggesting that kinetic T cell responses are associated with C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Responses of skin-resident T cells might compensate for blockage of infiltrating T cells in FTY720-treated mice at the late time point.
“suggesting that responses of skin-resident T cells might compensate for blockage of infiltrating T cells in FTY720-treated mice at the late time point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Skin-resident CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling C. auris colonization.
“These results demonstrated that skin-resident CD8+ T cells play an important role in controlling C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Dysregulated immune responses to fungal pathogen infections are associated with development of skin inflammatory diseases.
“Our finding of increased skin inflammation in C. auris-colonized CCR10-KO mice provides evidence supporting the association of dysregulated immune responses to fungal pathogen infections and development of skin inflammatory diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In CCR10-KO mice deficient of skin-resident T cells, there is compensatorily enhanced activation of IL-17A+ T cells to help control C. auris colonization.
“In CCR10-KO mice that are deficient of skin-resident T cells, there is compensatorily enhanced activation of IL-17A+ T cells to help control C. auris colonization but the over-active IL-17A+ T cell responses also cause more severe skin inflammatory symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study of CD8-KO mice provided strong evidence for an important role of CD8+ skin-resident T cells in controlling C. auris colonization.
“Similarly, while our study of CD8-KO mice provided strong evidence for an important role of CD8+ skin-resident T cells in controlling C. auris colonization, using inducible CD8+ T cell knockout mice could avoid confounding effects resulting from the germline deletion of the CD8a gene and provide a more precise assessment of the functions of CD8+ T cells in controlling C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
IL-17-independent mechanisms are also required for skin-resident T cells to control C. auris colonization.
“Our study suggests that IL-17-independent mechanisms are also required for skin-resident T cells to control C. auris colonization, although effector molecules involved in the IL-17A-independent mechanisms are yet to be identified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a limitation in extrapolating the findings to all other clades and strains of C. auris.
“Given the known genetic and phenotypic diversity among different clades of C. auris, there is a limitation in extrapolating our findings to all other clades and strains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is known genetic and phenotypic diversity among different clades of C. auris.
- May combine two claims. 16
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoordinated activation of IL-17-producing γδT, αβT cells and ILCs in the skin controls C. auris colonization, while mice deficient in T cells and ILCs have an impaired ability to control and clear C. auris colonization.
“Using a mouse model of topical C. auris application, Huang et al. first demonstrated that the coordinated activation of IL-17-producing γδT, αβT cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in the skin controls C. auris colonization, while mice deficient in T cells and ILCs have an impaired ability to control and clear C. auris colonization.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Huang, 2021, Murine model of colonization with fungal pathogen Candida auris to explore skin tropism, host risk factors and therapeutic strategies, Cell Host Microbe source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIL-17+ T cell responses are important in controlling commensal fungi or fungal pathogens.
“It was suggested that while IL-17+ T cell responses are important in controlling commensal fungi or fungal pathogens, they can promote tissue inflammatory diseases in predisposed hosts.41,42,43”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] Sparber, 2019, The Skin Commensal Yeast Malassezia Triggers a Type 17 Response that Coordinates Anti-fungal Immunity and Exacerbates Skin Inflammation, Cell Host Microbe source
- cites [42] Ruchti, 2023, New insights into immunity to skin fungi shape our understanding of health and disease, Parasite Immunol. source
- cites [43] Hurabielle, 2020, Immunity to commensal skin fungi promotes psoriasiform skin inflammation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCCR10 is a chemokine receptor expressed by most skin-resident T cells and is critical for their homeostatic establishment through interaction with CCL27 expressed by keratinocytes.
“CCR10 is a chemokine receptor expressed by most skin-resident T cells and is critical for their homeostatic establishment through interaction with its ligand CCL27, expressed by keratinocytes.20,21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Xia, 2014, CCR10 regulates balanced maintenance and function of resident regulatory and effector T cells to promote immune homeostasis in the skin, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. source
The Results report that a majority of skin-resident αβ T cells in mice express CCR10; the Discussion says CCR10 is critical for their migration into and balanced maintenance in skin under homeostatic conditions. The Introduction identifies CCL27 as its ligand, but our copy does not establish that interaction with keratinocyte-expressed CCL27 causes this effect. For healthy human skin, the Results report significant percentages of CCR10-positive T cells, not most skin-resident T cells. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] Davila, 2022, CCL27 is a crucial regulator of immune homeostasis of the skin and mucosal tissues, iScience source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIL-23 produced by keratinocytes can activate skin-resident IL-17+ γδT cells to control bacterial and fungal pathogen infections.
“it was previously reported that IL-23 produced by keratinocytes can activate skin-resident IL-17+ γδT cells to control bacterial and fungal pathogen infections.32,33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [32] Watson, 2024, The gene regulatory basis of bystander activation in CD8(+) T cells, Sci. Immunol. source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says that subsets of neonatal γδ T cells secrete IL-17 upon activation, and reference 45 identifies a study in which IL-23 induces IL-17 production from γδ T cells. Our copy does not say that keratinocytes produce the IL-23, that the cells are skin-resident, or that this pathway controls bacterial and fungal infections. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Cho, 2010, IL-17 is essential for host defense against cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice, J. Clin. Investig. source
The Results (page unavailable) show that IL-23 enhances IL-17 production by resident epidermal γδ T cells, and the Discussion (page unavailable) links these cells to defense against cutaneous S. aureus infection in mice. The paper does not establish that keratinocytes produce the IL-23 or that this pathway controls fungal infections. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIFNγ enhances re-infection of C. auris in an intradermal injection model of infection.
“A recent report found that IFNγ enhances re-infection of C. auris in an intradermal injection model of infection.40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Das, 2025, The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNgamma to Colonize the Skin, PLoS Pathog. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTopical C. auris application is considered more closely to mimic the natural process of skin colonization.
“Topical C. auris application is considered more closely to mimic the natural process of skin colonization.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Huang, 2021, Murine model of colonization with fungal pathogen Candida auris to explore skin tropism, host risk factors and therapeutic strategies, Cell Host Microbe source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAll skin-resident T cells are pre-activated T cells with effector/memory-like phenotypes, which could be activated in an innate fashion by alterations of molecular cues of the local tissue they reside in.
“All skin-resident T cells are pre-activated T cells with effector/memory-like phenotypes, which could be activated in an innate fashion by alterations of molecular cues of the local tissue they reside in.26,27,28,29,30,31,32”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 7 sources checked- cites [26] Clark, 2010, Skin-resident T cells: the ups and downs of on site immunity, J. Invest. Dermatol. source
In “Skin resident T cells: hiding in plain sight” (page unavailable), the review reports that over 95% of T cells in normal skin are memory T cells and 80% have an effector-memory phenotype; it does not say all are pre-activated. In “Local T cells responses in skin: lessons from psoriasis” (page unavailable), it describes activation of autoreactive T cells after local antigen-presenting cells produce IFNα. That example does not establish that all skin-resident T cells can be activated in an innate fashion by altered local molecular cues. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27] Fu, 2016, Cutting Edge: Skin CCR10+ CD8+ T Cells Support Resident Regulatory T Cells through the B7.2/Receptor Axis To Regulate Local Immune Homeostasis and Response, J. Immunol. source
The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) reports that most EGFP+ OT-I CD8+ cells in skin after immunization had markers typical of resident memory T cells. This supports a memory-like phenotype for the studied cells, but not the claim that all skin-resident T cells are pre-activated. The paper also does not establish that local molecular cues activate them in an innate fashion; its described OT-I activation followed Ova immunization. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28] Zareie, 2025, Cutaneous T cell immunity, Nat. Immunol. source
- cites [29] Lauvau, 2016, Memory CD8(+) T Cells: Innate-Like Sensors and Orchestrators of Protection, Trends Immunol. source
The Introduction identifies tissue-resident memory T cells as a memory CD8+ subset, and the ‘Sentinel cells’ section says inflammatory signals can reactivate memory CD8+ T cells without cognate antigen. But that section says circulating memory CD8+ cells mostly respond to those signals, while whether tissue-resident memory cells can respond to inflammatory cues alone remains unknown. The paper does not establish that all skin-resident T cells are pre-activated or have effector/memory-like phenotypes. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] Lee, 2022, Significance of bystander T cell activation in microbial infection, Nat. Immunol. source
- cites [31] Arkatkar, 2023, Memory T cells possess an innate-like function in local protection from mucosal infection, J. Clin. Investig. source
The Results section on human mucosal tissue memory CD8+ T cells reports that local cytokines can trigger innate-like bystander activation. The paper does not establish that all skin-resident T cells are pre-activated or have effector/memory-like phenotypes; its findings concern memory CD8+ T cells, primarily in mucosal tissue. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [32] Watson, 2024, The gene regulatory basis of bystander activation in CD8(+) T cells, Sci. Immunol. source
The Introduction (page not provided) describes neonatal CD8+ T cells as effector-like before stimulation and able to respond to innate cytokines; it also describes inflammation-dependent, TCR-independent activation in a subset of naïve CD8+ T cells. The paper does not establish that all skin-resident T cells are pre-activated or that changes in local skin-tissue cues activate them. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIL-17+ T cell responses can promote tissue inflammatory diseases in predisposed hosts.
“It was suggested that while IL-17+ T cell responses are important in controlling commensal fungi or fungal pathogens, they can promote tissue inflammatory diseases in predisposed hosts.41,42,43”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] Sparber, 2019, The Skin Commensal Yeast Malassezia Triggers a Type 17 Response that Coordinates Anti-fungal Immunity and Exacerbates Skin Inflammation, Cell Host Microbe source
- cites [42] Ruchti, 2023, New insights into immunity to skin fungi shape our understanding of health and disease, Parasite Immunol. source
- cites [43] Hurabielle, 2020, Immunity to commensal skin fungi promotes psoriasiform skin inflammation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataPercentages of IL-17A+ γδT cells remained similar at early and late time points after 1× vs 2× C. auris applications.
“while percentages of IL-17A+ γδT cells remained similar at the early and late time points (Figures 1C and 1D)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost skin IL-17A+ CD8+, CD4+ T cells and ILCs did not express CCR10(EGFP), while half of skin γδT17 cells were CCR10(EGFP)+ in CCR10+/EGFP mice.
“On the other hand, most skin IL-17A+ CD8+, CD4+ T cells and ILCs did not express CCR10(EGFP), while half of skin γδT17 cells were CCR10(EGFP)+ in CCR10+/EGFP mice (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a relatively increased percentage of IFNγ+ γδT cells in FTY720-treated mice, although they represented a minor fraction of total γδT cells.
“There was a relatively increased percentage of IFNγ+ γδT cells in FTY720-treated mice, although they represented a minor fraction of total γδT cells (Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe percentage of CD3medium+ γδT cells was significantly reduced while percentages of CD4+ αβT cells increased in anti-IL-17A antibody-treated mice.
“As a result, the percentage of CD3medium+ γδT cells, which include most γδT17 cells, was significantly reduced while percentages of CD4+ αβT cells increased in anti-IL-17A antibody-treated mice (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCCR10EGFP/EGFP littermates had significantly increased percentages of IL-17A+ CD8+ and CD4+ skin T cells, while they had similar percentages of IL-17A+ γδT cells and ILCs compared to CCR10+/EGFP mice.
“Compared to CCR10+/EGFP mice, CCR10EGFP/EGFP littermates had significantly increased percentages of IL-17A+ CD8+ and CD4+ skin T cells, while they had similar percentages of IL-17A+ γδT cells and ILCs (Figures 3C and 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant differences in total and IFNγ+ ILCs, while IL-17A+ ILCs were increased in FTY720-treated mice compared to PBS-treated controls 6 days after 2× applications.
“There were also no significant differences in total and IFNγ+ ILCs, while IL-17A+ ILCs were increased in FTY720-treated mice compared to PBS-treated controls (Figures 2F–2H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCCR10EGFP/EGFP and CCR10+/EGFP mice had similarly low levels of C. auris in the skin on day 13, both being greatly reduced from levels on day 6.
“CCR10EGFP/EGFP and CCR10+/EGFP mice had similarly low levels of C. auris in the skin on day 13 (Figure S2E), both being greatly reduced from levels on day 6 (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCD8-KO mice had compensatorily increased percentages of CD4+ αβT cells, while they had similar γδT cells and ILCs in the skin on day 6 after 1× C. auris application compared to WT mice.
“Compared to WT mice, CD8-KO mice had compensatorily increased percentages of CD4+ αβT cells, while they had similar γδT cells and ILCs in the skin on day 6 after 1× C. auris application (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningCommensal bacteria likely also have a role in the regulation of C. auris colonization.
“Considering commensal bacteria play an important role in shaping skin-resident T cell repertoire, they likely also have a role in the regulation of C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Commensal bacteria play an important role in shaping skin-resident T cell repertoire.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationDifferent mechanisms for keratinocytes to sense C. auris colonization.
“suggesting different mechanisms for keratinocytes to sense C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth IL-17-dependent and independent responses of skin-resident T cells are required to control C. auris colonization and maintain skin tissue homeostasis, while imbalanced T cell responses led to impaired control of C. auris and increased skin inflammation in CCR10-KO mice.
“We also found that both IL-17-dependent and independent responses of skin-resident T cells are required to control C. auris colonization and maintain skin tissue homeostasis, while imbalanced T cell responses led to impaired control of C. auris and increased skin inflammation in CCR10-KO mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBlockage of infiltrating T cells by FTY720 does not significantly affect C. auris colonization suggests that innate-like responses of skin-resident T cells, but not adaptive responses of infiltrating T cells, play a major role in controlling C. auris colonization.
“Our finding that blockage of infiltrating T cells by FTY720 does not significantly affect C. auris colonization suggests that innate-like responses of skin-resident T cells, but not adaptive responses of infiltrating T cells, play a major role in controlling C. auris colonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA significant percentage of IL-17A+ γδT and αβT cells migrate into the skin in response to C. auris colonization, which is blocked by FTY720 treatment.
“These results indicate that a significant percentage of IL-17A+ γδT and αβT cells migrate into the skin in response to the C. auris colonization, which is blocked by the FTY720 treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe current study used a single C. auris strain (CDC #0383, African Clade) in all experiments.
“The current study used a single C. auris strain (CDC #0383, African Clade) in all experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCard9 promotes IL-17+ T cell responses to some fungal pathogens.
“The C-type lectin receptor adaptor molecule Card9 was found to promote IL-17+ T cell responses to some fungal pathogens”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImbalanced T cell responses in CCR10-KO mice lead to impaired control of pathogen infections and dysregulated skin immune homeostasis.
“These results indicate that imbalanced T cell responses in CCR10-KO mice lead to impaired control of pathogen infections and dysregulated skin immune homeostasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIncreased IL-17A-producing T cells in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice help to control C. auris colonization but are not sufficient to completely compensate for defective responses of CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells.
“These results support the notion that increased IL-17A-producing T cells in CCR10EGFP/EGFP mice help to control C. auris colonization but they are not sufficient to completely compensate for defective responses of CCR10-dependent skin-resident T cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe studies in this report focused on skin-resident cells.
“Our studies in this report focused on skin-resident cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSex- and age-matched male and female mice were used.
“Sex- and age-matched male and female mice were used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenLittermates were used when possible.
“Littermates were used when possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll mice were on the C57BL/6 genetic background.
“All mice were on the C57BL/6 genetic background and were raised in the SPF conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataC. auris colonies were counted and their identities were verified using PCR.
“Numbers of C. auris colonies were counted and their identities were verified using PCR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll mice were raised in SPF conditions.
“All mice were on the C57BL/6 genetic background and were raised in the SPF conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
FTY720 treatment blocks T cell infiltration into the skin without affecting the function of skin-resident T cells.
“Therefore, only responses of skin-resident T cells and ILCs would be involved in controlling C. auris skin colonization in FTY720-treated mice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CCR10 deficiency specifically impairs skin-resident T cell establishment without other confounding effects on antifungal immunity.
“Homozygous CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI (CCR10EGFP/EGFP, or CCR10−/− for simplicity) mice have dysregulated skin-resident T cells compared to heterozygous CCR10-KO/EGFP-KI (CCR10+/EGFP or CCR10+/−) mice, characterized mostly by the reduction of CD8+ and CD4+ αβT cells but not IL-17A+ αβT or γδT cells.20,22,23”
The paper relies on this without support.
CD8+ T cell deficiency specifically removes CD8+ T cells without other confounding effects that increase C. auris colonization.
“we tested whether they played an important role in controlling C. auris skin colonization using CD8a-knockout (CD8-KO) mice, which are deficient of CD8+ T cells.24”
The paper relies on this without support.
Commensal bacteria play an important role in shaping skin-resident T cell repertoire.
“Considering commensal bacteria play an important role in shaping skin-resident T cell repertoire, they likely also have a role in the regulation of C. auris colonization.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is known genetic and phenotypic diversity among different clades of C. auris.
“Given the known genetic and phenotypic diversity among different clades of C. auris, there is a limitation in extrapolating our findings to all other clades and strains.”
Cites
Topographical and Temporal Diversity of the Human Skin Microbiome
Grice, E. A., Kong, H. H., Conlan, S., Deming, C. B., Davis, J., Young, A. C., Program, N. C. S., Bouffard, G. G., Blakesley, R. W., Murray, P. R., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1171700 · Cited by 2,953 · see citing works
Byrd, A. L., Belkaid, Y., & Segre, J. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157 · Cited by 2,806 · see citing works
Lockhart, S. R., Etienne, K. A., Vallabhaneni, S., Farooqi, J., Chowdhary, A., Govender, N. P., Colombo, A. L., Calvo, B., Cuomo, C. A., Desjardins, C. A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw691 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Satoh, K., Makimura, K., Hasumi, Y., Nishiyama, Y., Uchida, K., & Yamaguchi, H. (2009) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
LeibundGut-Landmann, S., Groß, O., Robinson, M. J., Osorio, F., Slack, E. C., Tsoni, S. V., Schweighoffer, E., Tybulewicz, V., Brown, G. D., Ruland, J., et al. (2007) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1460 · Cited by 1,191 · see citing works
Nakatsuji, T., Chen, T. H., Narala, S., Chun, K. A., Two, A. M., Yun, T., Shafiq, F., Kotol, P. F., Bouslimani, A., Melnik, A. V., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4680 · Cited by 1,095 · see citing works
Compartmentalized Control of Skin Immunity by Resident Commensals
Naik, S., Bouladoux, N., Wilhelm, C., Molloy, M. J., Salcedo, R., Kastenmuller, W., Deming, C., Quinones, M., Koo, L., Conlan, S., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225152 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs
Cyster, J. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115628 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
IL-17 is essential for host defense against cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice
Cho, J. S., Pietras, E. M., Garcia, N. C., Ramos, R. I., Farzam, D. M., Monroe, H. R., Magorien, J. E., Blauvelt, A., Kolls, J. K., Cheung, A. L., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci40891 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Candida auris: a Review of the Literature
Jeffery-Smith, A., Taori, S. K., Schelenz, S., Jeffery, K. J., Johnson, E. M., Borman, A. M., Candida auris Incident Management Team, Manuel, R. J., & Brown, C. S. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00029-17 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
CD8 is needed for development of cytotoxic T but not helper T cells
Fung‐Leung, W., Schilham, M. W., Rahemtulla, A., Kündig, T. M., Vollenweider, M., Potter, J., van Ewijk, W., & Mak, T. W. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90462-8 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Cornely, O. A., Sprute, R., Bassetti, M., Chen, W., Groll, A. H., Kurzai, O., Lass‐Flörl, C., Ostrosky‐Zeichner, L., Rautemaa‐Richardson, R., Revathi, G., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00749-7 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Immune responses to human fungal pathogens and therapeutic prospects
Lionakis, M. S., Drummond, R. A., & Hohl, T. M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00826-w · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Skin-resident T cells: the ups and downs of on site immunity
Clark, R. A. (2010) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2009.247 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Sparber, F., De Gregorio, C., Steckholzer, S., Ferreira, F. M., Dolowschiak, T., Ruchti, F., Kirchner, F. R., Mertens, S., Prinz, I., Joller, N., et al. (2019) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.002 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Kordalewska, M., Zhao, Y., Lockhart, S. R., Chowdhary, A., Berrío, I., & Perlin, D. S. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00630-17 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Cai, Y., Xue, F., Fleming, C., Yang, J., Ding, C., Ma, Y., Liu, M., Zhang, H.-G., Zheng, J., Xiong, N., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4986 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging fungal pathogen Candida auris evades neutrophil attack
Johnson, C. J., Davis, J. M., Huttenlocher, A., Kernien, J. F., & Nett, J. E. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01403-18 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Bruno, M., Kersten, S., Bain, J. M., Jaeger, M., Rosati, D., Kruppa, M. D., Lowman, D. W., Rice, P. J., Graves, B., Ma, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0780-3 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Huang, X., Hurabielle, C., Drummond, R. A., Bouladoux, N., Desai, J. V., Sim, C. K., Belkaid, Y., Lionakis, M. S., & Segre, J. A. (2021) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.002 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Significance of bystander T cell activation in microbial infection
Lee, H., Jeong, S., & Shin, E.-C. (2022) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-021-00985-3 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
<i>Candida auris</i> Infections
Lionakis, M. S., & Chowdhary, A. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2402635 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Innate immune responses against the fungal pathogen Candida auris
Wang, Y., Zou, Y., Chen, X., Li, H., Yin, Z., Zhang, B., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., Huang, X., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31201-x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Immunity to commensal skin fungi promotes psoriasiform skin inflammation
Hurabielle, C., Link, V. M., Bouladoux, N., Han, S.-J., Merrill, E. D., Lightfoot, Y. L., Seto, N., Bleck, C. K. E., Smelkinson, M., Harrison, O. J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003022117 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Skin autonomous antibody production regulates host–microbiota interactions
Gribonika, I., Band, V. I., Chi, L., Pérez‐Chaparro, P. J., Link, V. M., Ansaldo, E., Oguz, C., Bousbaine, D., Fischbach, M. A., & Belkaid, Y. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08376-y · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Xia, M., Hu, S., Fu, Y., Jin, W., Yi, Q., Matsui, Y., Yang, J., McDowell, M. A., Sarkar, S., Kalia, V., et al. (2014) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.010 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationCandida auris: Epidemiology and Antifungal Strategy
Eix, E. F., & Nett, J. E. (2024) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-061523-021233 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Horton, M. V., Johnson, C. J., Zarnowski, R., Andes, B. D., Schoen, T. J., Kernien, J. F., Lowman, D., Kruppa, M. D., Ma, Z., Williams, D. L., et al. (2021) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00406-21 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Jin, Y., Xia, M., Sun, A., Saylor, C. M., & Xiong, N. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1001612 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationThe many faces of Candida auris: Phenotypic and strain variation in an emerging pathogen
Santana, D. J., Zhao, G., & O’Meara, T. R. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012011 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Yang, J., Hu, S., Zhao, L., Kaplan, D. H., Perdew, G. H., & Xiong, N. (2016) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3312 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationThe gene regulatory basis of bystander activation in CD8 <sup>+</sup> T cells
Watson, N. B., Patel, R. K., Kean, C., Veazey, J., Oyesola, O. O., Laniewski, N., Grenier, J. K., Wang, J., Tabilas, C., Yee Mon, K. J., et al. (2024) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.adf8776 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
CCL27 is a crucial regulator of immune homeostasis of the skin and mucosal tissues
Davila, M. L., Xu, M., Huang, C., Gaddes, E. R., Winter, L., Cantorna, M. T., Wang, Y., & Xiong, N. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104426 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationClonal Candida auris and ESKAPE pathogens on the skin of residents of nursing homes
Proctor, D. M., Sansom, S. E., Deming, C., Conlan, S., Blaustein, R. A., Atkins, T. K., Program, N. C. S., Mullikin, J., Thomas, J., Young, A., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08608-9 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Memory CD8(+) T Cells: Innate-Like Sensors and Orchestrators of Protection
Lauvau, G., Boutet, M., Williams, T. M., Chin, S. S., & Chorro, L. (2016) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2016.04.001 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
New insights into immunity to skin fungi shape our understanding of health and disease
Ruchti, F., & LeibundGut‐Landmann, S. (2023) · Parasite Immunology · doi:10.1111/pim.12948 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Li, C., Xu, M., Coyne, J., Wang, W.-B., Davila, M. L., Wang, Y., & Xiong, N. (2021) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationDatta, A., Das, D., Nett, J. E., Vyas, J. M., Lionakis, M. S., & Thangamani, S. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02215-23 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“C . auris induces weaker IL-17 + T cell responses than C. albicans does in an intradermal infection model of mice, 17 which might partially explain its prolonged skin colonization.”
Zareie, P., Weiss, E. S., Kaplan, D. H., & Mackay, L. K. (2025) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-025-02145-3 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Memory T cells possess an innate-like function in local protection from mucosal infection
Arkatkar, T., Davé, V., Cruz Talavera, I., Graham, J. B., Swarts, J. L., Hughes, S. M., Bell, T. A., Hock, P., Farrington, J., Shaw, G. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci162800 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Balakumar, A., Das, D., Datta, A., Mishra, A., Bryak, G., Ganesh, S. M., Netea, M. G., Kumar, V., Lionakis, M. S., Arora, D., et al. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012699 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Innate immune response to Candida auris
Holt, A. M., & Nett, J. E. (2024) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2024.102510 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Emerging Fungal Pathogen Candida auris Induces IFNγ to Colonize the Skin
Das, D., Ganesh, S. M., Mishra, A., Netea, M. G., & Thangamani, S. (2025) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1013114 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Fu, Y., Yang, J., & Xiong, N. (2016) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1502662 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationVertebrate and invertebrate animal infection models of Candida auris pathogenicity
Martinez, M., Garsin, D. A., & Lorenz, M. C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2024.102506 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ukolobi, O., Jacob, J. N., Akpo, M. O., Edo, G. I., Agbo, J. J., Orogu, J. O., Yousif, E., Jikah, A. N., Akpoghelie, P. O., Oghroro, E. E. A., et al. (2026) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2026.117711
- Authors
- Xie, J., Yan, L., Kadosh, D., & Xiong, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xiong, Na
- Venue
- iScience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 115862
- ISSN
- 2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13194182
- OpenAlex
- W7155491874
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA054174)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR002645)
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- skin-resident T cells, Candida auris, skin colonization, fungal skin infection, antifungal immunity, skin microbiome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review