Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is the major pattern recognition receptor triggering the protective effect of a Candida albicans extracellular vesicle-based vaccine prototype in murine systemic candidiasis

Honorato, Leandro, Bonilla, Jhon J. Artunduaga, Valdez, Alessandro F., Frases, Susana, Araújo, Glauber Ribeiro de Sousa, Sabino, Albaniza Liuane Ribeiro do Nascimento, da Silva, Natalia Martins, Ribeiro, Larissa, Ferreira, Marina da Silva, Kornetz, Julio, Rodrigues, Marcio L., Cunningham, Iain, Gow, Neil A. R., Gacser, Attila, Guimarães, Allan J., Dutra, Fabianno F., Nimrichter, Leonardo·2024·mSphere

Abstract

Systemic candidiasis remains a significant public health concern worldwide, with high mortality rates despite available antifungal drugs. Drug-resistant strains add to the urgency for alternative therapies. In this context, vaccination has reemerged as a prominent immune-based strategy. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), nanosized lipid bilayer particles, carry a diverse array of native fungal antigens, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and glycans. Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that Candida albicans EVs triggered the innate immune response, activating bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) and potentially acting as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. Vaccination with C. albicans EVs induced the production of specific antibodies, modulated cytokine production, and provided protection in immunosuppressed mice infected with lethal C. albicans inoculum. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying EV-induced immune activation, our study investigated pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) involved in EVs-phagocyte engagement. EVs from wild-type and mutant C. albicans strains with truncated mannoproteins were compared for their ability to stimulate BMDCs. Our findings revealed that EV decoration with O - and N -linked mannans and the presence of β -1,3-glucans and chitin oligomers may modulate the activation of specific PRRs, in particular Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and dectin-1. The protective effect of vaccination with wild-type EVs was found to be dependent on TLR4. These results suggest that fungal EVs can be harnessed in vaccine formulations to selectively activate PRRs in phagocytes, offering potential avenues for combating or preventing candidiasis. IMPORTANCE: Systemic candidiasis is a serious global health concern with high mortality rates and growing drug resistance. Vaccination offers a promising solution. A unique approach involves using tiny lipid-coated particles called extracellular vesicles (EVs), which carry various fungal components. Previous studies found that Candida albicans EVs activate the immune response and may bridge the gap between innate and adaptive immunity. To understand this better, we investigated how these EVs activate immune cells. We demonstrated that specific components on EV surfaces, such as mannans and glucans, interact with receptors on immune cells, including Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and dectin-1. Moreover, vaccinating with these EVs led to strong immune responses and full protection in mice infected with Candida . This work shows how harnessing fungal EVs might lead to effective vaccines against candidiasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/msphere.00467-24

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1055/s-0040-1701215 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrdp.2018.26 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30103-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/myc.12531 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/myc.12535 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100117 · DOI
  7. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00166 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s42770-022-00739-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/AAC.01719-20 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nrmicro3156 · DOI
  11. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1002406 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.069 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.038 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/mBio.00042-10 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/cmi.13238 · DOI
  16. 10.1128/mBio.01707-21 · DOI
  17. 10.3390/vaccines11030539 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.03.005 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-3-030-83391-6_10 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/cmi.12374 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/cmi.12374 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.21 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/jev2.12129 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.xphs.2022.08.032 · DOI
  26. 10.1128/mSystems.00822-21 · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1365-280x.1999.00247.x · DOI
  28. 10.1021/pr5007944 · DOI
  29. 10.1128/mbio.00301-22 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M502162200 · DOI
  31. 10.1074/jbc.M411413200 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/mmi.12426 · DOI
  33. 10.1172/JCI27114 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/cmi.13217 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.04.009 · DOI
  36. 10.1128/mSphere.00476-20 · DOI
  37. 10.1128/mSphere.00080-19 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01160.x · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nri3897 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.3390/jof7020119 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042 · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004050 · DOI
  43. 10.15252/embr.201846065 · DOI
  44. 10.3390/molecules19044433 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.021 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.it.2012.04.008 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/s40264-015-0350-4 · DOI
  48. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020142 · DOI
  49. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01144 · DOI
  50. 10.1073/pnas.1400478111 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00737-5 · DOI
  52. 10.4049/jimmunol.2200495 · DOI
  53. 10.1074/jbc.M405003200 · DOI
  54. 10.1084/jem.176.6.1693 · DOI
  55. 10.3390/jof6040250 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/00362178185380441 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Honorato, L., Bonilla, J. J. A., Valdez, A. F., Frases, S., Araújo, G. R. D. S., Sabino, A. L. R. D. N., da Silva, N. M., Ribeiro, L., Ferreira, M. D. S., Kornetz, J., Rodrigues, M. L., Cunningham, I., Gow, N. A. R., Gacser, A., Guimarães, A. J., Dutra, F. F., & Nimrichter, L.
Venue
mSphere
Published
2024-08-28
Volume
9
Issue
8
ISSN
2379-5042
Cited by
28
References
9
Language
en
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (001)
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (E-26/204.281/2021, 26/211.300/2021, 26/202.696/2018, 26/202.809/2018, 26/201.032/2022)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (408843/2021-7, 405520/2018-2, 440015/2018-9, 311179/2017-7, 408711/2017-7, 408843/2021-7)
  • UKRI | Medical Research Council (MR/M026663/2)
  • Medical Research Council Centre for Medical Mycology (MR/N006364/2)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review