Cited by 48Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Infections and Studies

Current trends in candidemia and species distribution among adults: Candida glabrata surpasses C. albicans in diabetic patients and abdominal sources

Khatib, Riad, Johnson, Leonard B., Fakih, Mohamad G., Riederer, Kathleen, Briski, Laurence·2016·Mycoses

Abstract

Candidemia rate and species distribution vary according to the type of patients, country of origin and antifungal prophylaxis use. To present current candidemia epidemiological trends. A retrospective examination of candidemia in adults (≥18 years-old) hospitalised from 2007 to 2015. Cases were identified through the microbiology laboratory. Candida species were distinguished based on colony morphology and VITEK-2 YBC cards, (bioMerieux, Durham, NC, USA). Patient characteristics, species distribution, source and outcome were assessed. We encountered 275 patients (294 episodes) with candidemia. The rate of candidemia dropped in 2010 (P = 0.003) without further decline. Nearly all cases (97.5%) were healthcare-associated. C. albicans (n = 118) and C. glabrata (n = 77) proportions varied without a discernable trend. C. glabrata was more common in diabetics [52.9% vs. 32.0% (non-diabetics); P = 0.004] and abdominal sources [53.3% vs. 35.5% (other sources); P = 0.03], especially gastric/duodenal foci [88.9% vs. 44.1% (other abdominal foci); P = 0.02]. All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 43.3% without changes over time or differences between C. albicans and C. glabrata. In conclusion, the candidemia rate remains stable after a decline in 2010. C. albicans remains the most common species but C. glabrata predominates in diabetics and abdominal sources. These findings suggest possible species-related differences in colonisation dynamics or pathogenicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/myc.12531

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. glabrata bloodstream infections are commonly found in elderly individuals, diabetic patients and solid organ transplant recipients.

    “C. glabrata bloodstream infections are commonly found in elderly individuals, diabetic patients and solid organ transplant recipients [6,8,9].”

    From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khatib, R., Johnson, L. B., Fakih, M. G., Riederer, K., & Briski, L.
Affiliations
St. John Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Khatib, Riad
Venue
Mycoses
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-12
Volume
59
Issue
12
Pages
781-786
ISSN
  • 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
  • 0933-7407
  • 1439-0507
OpenAlex
W2462867566
Cited by
48
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mycoses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
St. John Hospital Medical Staff Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
candidemia, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, species distribution, diabetes mellitus, 30-day mortality, antifungal prophylaxis, epidemiological trends
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Candida albicans, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Candida glabrata, Diabetes Complications, Candidemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review