The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy
Open accessAbstract
Background: Adverse cognitive and educational outcomes are often ascribed to perinatal hypoxia without good evidence. Objective: To investigate neurocognitive and behavioural outcomes after neonatal encephalopathy. Methods: Sixty five children with neonatal encephalopathy, identified using the Trent Neonatal Survey database for 1992–1994, were followed up at the age of 7 years. They were examined at school, with a classmate for those in mainstream school, by a paediatrician and a psychologist. Neonatal encephalopathy was graded as moderate or severe using published definitions. Findings: Fifteen children had major disability, all with cerebral palsy; eight were in special school with severe cognitive impairment (IQ<55). Disability was present in 6% of the moderate and 42% of the severe encephalopathy group. Of the 50 children without motor disability, cognitive scores were lowest in the severe group (mean IQ difference from peers −11.3 points (95% confidence interval (CI) −19.0 to −3.6) and with similar scores for the moderate group compared with classmates (mean difference −1.7 points (95% CI −7.3 to +3.9). Neuropsychological testing showed similar findings in all domains. In particular, memory and attention/executive functions were impaired in the severe group. Despite relatively small differences in performance of the moderate group, special educational needs were identified more often in both encephalopathy groups, associated with lower achievement on national curriculum attainment targets. Interpretation: After neonatal encephalopathy, subtle cognitive impairments are found in the absence of neuromotor impairment. Subtle impairments are found more commonly after a more severe clinical course. Studies of brain protection strategies require long term follow up to study effects on cognitive outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908
Volpe, J. J. (1981) · PubMed · Cited by 2,932
Neonatal Encephalopathy Following Fetal Distress: A Clinical and Electroencephalographic Study
Sarnat, H. B. (1976) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012 · Cited by 2,680
Differential Effects of Early Hippocampal Pathology on Episodic and Semantic Memory
Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W., & Mishkin, M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.376 · Cited by 1,746
Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study
Badawi, N., Kurinczuk, J. J., Keogh, J. M., Alessandri, L. M., O'Sullivan, F., Burton, P. R., Pemberton, P. J., & Stanley, F. J. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1549 · Cited by 888
NEONATAL ENCEPHALOPATHY FOLLOWING FETAL DISTRESS
SARNAT, H. B., & SARNAT, M. S. (1977) · OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY · doi:10.1097/00006254-197705000-00011 · Cited by 649
Swinson, J. (2013) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2013.853380 · Cited by 600
Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study
Badawi, N., Kurinczuk, J. J., Keogh, J. M., Alessandri, L. M., O'Sullivan, F., Burton, P. R., Pemberton, P. J., & Stanley, F. J. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1554 · Cited by 588
Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study
Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1983) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90229-3 · Cited by 545
School performance of survivors of neonatal encephalopathy associated with birth asphyxia at term
Robertson, C. M. T., Finer, N. N., & Grace, M. G. A. (1989) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80132-5 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Rutherford, M., Ramenghi, L. A., Edwards, A. D., Brocklehurst, P., Halliday, H., Levene, M., Strohm, B., Thoresen, M., Whitelaw, A., & Azzopardi, D. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70295-9 · Cited by 600
Brain injury in premature neonates: A primary cerebral dysmaturation disorder?
Back, S. A., & Miller, S. P. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24132 · Cited by 360
Measured gene-by-environment interaction in relation to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Nigg, J., Nikolas, M., & Burt, S. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.01.025 · Cited by 259
Wolke, D., Strauss, V. Y.-C., Johnson, S., Gilmore, C., Marlow, N., & Jaekel, J. (2015) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.02.065 · Cited by 67
Self-citationMuntsant, A., Shrivastava, K., Recasens, M., & Giménez-Llort, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00007 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Marlow, N., Rose, A. S., Rands, C. E., & Draper, E. S.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-08-19
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- F380-F387
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2170240588
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2004.067520
- The paper
- Marlow, N., Rose, A. S., Rands, C. E., & Draper, E. S. (2005). Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.067520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.