Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in patients with early age-related macular degeneration

Open access
Midena, E., Vujosevic, S., Convento, E., Manfre', A., Cavarzeran, F., Pilotto, E.·2007·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has been correlated with different functional alterations, but the exact relationship between fundus lesions and overlying sensitivity is not well known. The aim of this study was to compare fundus-related sensitivity (microperimetry) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) of the macular area with drusen and pigment abnormalities in early AMD. METHODS: 13 consecutive patients with early AMD and visual acuity of 20/20 were studied by means of microperimetry, which automatically analyses macular light differential threshold and fixation patterns. Fundus colour photo and FAF of the macular area were recorded on the same day. Microperimetry was exactly (topographically) superimposed over FAF images. RESULTS: Macular sensitivity significantly decreased over large drusen (11.2 +/- 5.6 dB, p<0.0001) and over pigment abnormalities (13.1 +/- 3.6 dB, p<0.0001). When both characteristics were present the reduction was greater if compared with its absence (9.6 +/- 4.3 versus 15.0 +/- 4.5 dB, p<0.0001). Sensitivitity reduction was significant in areas with altered FAF when compared with areas with normal FAF (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased FAF in early AMD has a functional correlate exactly quantified by microperimetry. In retinal areas affected by early AMD retinal sensitivity deteriorates, despite good visual acuity. Microperimetry may allow the early detection of functional impairment caused by these lesions. Both microperimetry and FAF may be useful to monitor AMD progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.2007.119685

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Midena, E., Vujosevic, S., Convento, E., Manfre', A., Cavarzeran, F., & Pilotto, E.
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-05-15
Volume
91
Issue
11
Pages
1499-1503
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127949089
Cited by
255
References
36
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.2007.119685
The paper
Midena, E., Vujosevic, S., Convento, E., Manfre', A., Cavarzeran, F., & Pilotto, E. (2007). Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in patients with early age-related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.119685

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.