Cited by 246Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifePhysical Activity and Health

Exercise improves quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Gerritsen, Jasper K W, Vincent, Arnaud J P E·2016·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: Exercise may be associated with increased health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with cancer, but it is not prescribed as standard care during or after cancer treatment. We systematically reviewed the methodological quality of, and summarised the evidence from, randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis was performed to examine the effectiveness of exercise in improving the QoL in patients with cancer, during and after medical treatment. Methods: RCTs that met the PICO (Patient Intervention Control Outcome) format were included in this study. 16 RCTs were identified through a search of Embase, Medline (OvidSP) and the Cochrane Library. These trials were reviewed for substantive results and the methodological quality was assessed using the Delphi criteria list. Results: Exercise interventions differed widely in content, frequency, duration and intensity. Based on the meta-analysis, exercise improved QoL significantly in patients with cancer as compared to usual care (mean difference 5.55, 95% CI (3.19 to 7.90), p<0.001). Other outcomes closely related to QoL, such as fatigue and physical functioning, also improved. Conclusions: Exercise has a direct positive impact on QoL in patients with cancer, during and following medical intervention. Exercise is a clinically relevant treatment and should be an adjunct to disease therapy in oncology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094787

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerritsen, J. K. W., & Vincent, A. J. P. E.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Vincent, Arnaud J P E
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-12-30
Volume
50
Issue
13
Pages
796-803
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2225480285
Cited by
246
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical activity, cancer patients, health-related quality of life, fatigue, physical function, exercise intervention, cancer therapy, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review