Cited by 264Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and Education

How should clinicians rehabilitate patients after ACL reconstruction? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with a focus on quality appraisal (AGREE II)

Open access
Andrade, Renato, Pereira, Rogério, van Cingel, Robert, Staal, J Bart, Espregueira-Mendes, João·2020·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To summarise recommendations and appraise the quality of international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Design: Systematic review of CPGs (PROSPERO number: CRD42017020407). Data sources: Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SPORTDiscus, PEDro and grey literature databases were searched up to 30 September 2018. Eligibility criteria: English-language CPGs on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction that used systematic search of evidence to formulate recommendations. Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to report the systematic review. Two appraisers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument to report comprehensiveness, consistency and quality of CPGs. We summarised recommendations for rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Results: Six CPGs with an overall median AGREE II total score of 130 points (out of 168) and median overall quality of 63% were included. One CPG had an overall score below the 50% (poor quality score) and two CPGs scored above 80% (higher quality score). The lowest domain score was ‘applicability’ (can clinicians implement this in practice?) (29%) and the highest ‘scope and purpose’ (78%) and ‘clarity of presentation’ (75%). CPGs recommended immediate knee mobilisation and strength/neuromuscular training. Early full weight-bearing exercises, early open and closed kinetic-chain exercises, cryotherapy and neuromuscular electrostimulation may be used according individual circumstances. The CPGs recommend against continuous passive motion and functional bracing. Conclusion: The quality of the CPGs in ACL postoperative rehabilitation was good, but all CPGs showed poor applicability. Immediate knee mobilisation and strength/neuromuscular training should be used. Continuous passive motion and functional bracing should be eschewed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100310

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patellofemoral joint stress steadily increases from partial to medium depth squatting (0° to 90°).

    “Patellofemoral joint stress steadily increases from partial to medium depth squatting (0° to 90°).42”

    From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The ‘What does this study mean for clinicians?’ section discusses patellofemoral pain and exercise selection after ACL reconstruction, but not how joint stress changes with squat depth. Searches for patellofemoral joint stress and squatting from 0° to 90° found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Quadriceps force contributes directly to patellofemoral joint reaction force and patellofemoral joint stress.

    “This is important as quadriceps force contributes directly to patellofemoral joint reaction force and patellofemoral joint stress.42”

    From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The ‘What does this study mean for clinicians?’ section recommends quadriceps strengthening and prioritising closed kinetic-chain exercises to mitigate patellofemoral pain. It does not address whether quadriceps force directly contributes to patellofemoral joint reaction force or stress; searches for those terms and their biomechanical relationship found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increase in patellofemoral joint stress is the result of a steadily increasing patellofemoral joint reaction force that is more pronounced than the increase in contact area as the knee flexes.

    “The increase in patellofemoral joint stress is the result of a steadily increasing patellofemoral joint reaction force that is more pronounced than the increase in contact area as the knee flexes.42”

    From A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice. (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The section ‘What does this study mean for clinicians?’ discusses limiting patellofemoral pain during ACL rehabilitation, but does not explain how patellofemoral joint stress changes with knee flexion. Searches for joint reaction force, contact area, and stress found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed mechanism; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NTvG V. EBRO richtlijnen. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 2005;149:213-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrade, R., Pereira, R., van Cingel, R., Staal, J. B., & Espregueira-Mendes, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Fernando Pessoa University (PT)
  • HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
Andrade, Renato
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-06-07
Volume
54
Issue
9
Pages
512-519
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2948803383
Cited by
264
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, postoperative rehabilitation, guideline quality assessment, AGREE II, resistance training, neuromuscular training, closed kinetic chain exercises, open kinetic chain exercises, cryotherapy, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, continuous passive motion, functional bracing, weight-bearing exercise
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Early Ambulation, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Range of Motion, Articular, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Cryotherapy, Resistance Training, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review