Cited by 1,446Clinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in ResearchHealth Education and Validation

Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project

Open access
·2003·Quality and Safety in Health Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International interest in clinical practice guidelines has never been greater but many published guidelines do not meet the basic quality requirements. There have been renewed calls for validated criteria to assess the quality of guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an international instrument for assessing the quality of the process and reporting of clinical practice guideline development. METHODS: The instrument was developed through a multi-staged process of item generation, selection and scaling, field testing, and refinement procedures. 100 guidelines selected from 11 participating countries were evaluated independently by 194 appraisers with the instrument. Following refinement the instrument was further field tested on three guidelines per country by a new set of 70 appraisers. RESULTS: The final version of the instrument contained 23 items grouped into six quality domains with a 4 point Likert scale to score each item (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, editorial independence). 95% of appraisers found the instrument useful for assessing guidelines. Reliability was acceptable for most domains (Cronbach's alpha 0.64-0.88). Guidelines produced as part of an established guideline programme had significantly higher scores on editorial independence and, after the publication of a national policy, had significantly higher quality scores on rigour of development (p<0.005). Guidelines with technical documentation had higher scores on that domain (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time an appraisal instrument for clinical practice guidelines has been developed and tested internationally. The instrument is sensitive to differences in important aspects of guidelines and can be used consistently and easily by a wide range of professionals from different backgrounds. The adoption of common standards should improve the consistency and quality of the reporting of guideline development worldwide and provide a framework to encourage international comparison of clinical practice guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qhc.12.1.18

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperinsulinemia is believed to worsen hyperandrogenism and the reproductive and metabolic manifestations of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents.

    “Hyperinsulinemia is believed to exacerbate the hyperandrogenism and the reproductive and metabolic manifestations of PCOS in adolescents.”
  • With one published exception, current definitions of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescent or adult women do not include insulin resistance or hyperinsulinemia as a diagnostic criterion.

    “With the exception of one published recommendation, none of the current definitions of PCOS in adolescent or adult women include insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia as a diagnostic criterion [1, 10-12, 18, 19, 112]”
  • Features of polycystic ovary syndrome overlap with normal pubertal development.

    “Features of PCOS overlap normal pubertal development.”
  • Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are intrinsic to polycystic ovary syndrome in adults and adolescents, whether lean or obese.

    “Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are intrinsic to PCOS in adults and adolescents, lean or obese.”
  • Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescence are controversial because adult diagnostic features may be normal pubertal events.

    “The diagnostic criteria for PCOS in adolescence are controversial, primarily because the diagnostic pathological features used in adult women, e.g.acne, irregular menses, and PCOM, may be normal pubertal physiological events [18]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Thomson R, Lavender M, Madhok R. How to ensure that guidelines are effective. BMJ 1995;311:237-42.
  2. Lohr KN. The quality of practice guidelines and the quality of health care. In: Guidelines in health care. Report of a WHO Conference, January 1997, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1998.
  3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. Statistics notes. BMJ 1997;314:572.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
18-23
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2138363439
Cited by
1,446
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 121
FWCI
41.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Aberdeen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
guideline quality assessment, AGREE instrument, guideline development, reporting quality, stakeholder engagement, editorial independence, international comparison of guidelines, instrument validation, reliability statistics
MeSH terms
Europe, Health Services Research, Humans, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review