Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial

Open access
Lu, Zhihao, Wang, Junye, Shu, Yongqian, Liu, Lianke, Kong, Li, Yang, Lei, Wang, Buhai, Sun, Guogui, Ji, Yinghua, Cao, Guochun, Liu, Hu, Cui, Tongjian, Li, Na, Qiu, Wensheng, Li, Gaofeng, Hou, Xinfang, Luo, Hui, Xue, Liying, Zhang, Yanqiao, Yue, Wenbin, Liu, Zheng, Wang, Xiuwen, Gao, Shegan, Pan, Yueyin, Galais, Marie-Pierre, Zaanan, Aziz, Ma, Zhuo, Li, Haoyu, Wang, Yan, Shen, Lin·2022·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy (cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) as first line treatment of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Design: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. Setting: 66 sites in China and 13 sites outside of China between 14 December 2018 and 9 April 2021. Participants: 659 adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had not received systemic treatment. Intervention: Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive sintilimab or placebo (3 mg/kg in patients weighing <60 kg or 200 mg in patients weighing ≥60 kg) in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 every three weeks. The trial was amended to allow investigators to choose the chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m 2 continuous infusion on days 1-5). Main outcome measures: Overall survival in all patients and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 for expression of programmed cell death ligand 1. Results: 659 patients were randomly assigned to sintilimab (n=327) or placebo (n=332) with chemotherapy. 616 of 659 patients (93%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel and 43 of 659 patients (7%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. At the interim analysis, sintilimab with chemotherapy showed better overall survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (median 16.7 v 12.5 months, hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.78, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (17.2 v 13.6 months, 0.64, 0.48 to 0.85, P=0.002). Sintilimab and chemotherapy significantly improved progression free survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (7.2 v 5.7 months, 0.56, 0.46 to 0.68, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (8.3 v 6.4 months, 0.58, 0.45 to 0.75, P<0.001). Adverse events related to treatment occurred in 321 of 327 patients (98%) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy group versus 326 of 332 (98%) patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Rates of adverse events related to treatment, grade ≥3, were 60% (196/327) and 55% (181/332) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy groups, respectively. Conclusions: Compared with placebo, sintilimab in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed significant benefits in overall survival and progression free survival as first line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Similar benefits of sintilimab with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil seem promising. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748134 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2021-068714

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Lu, Z., Wang, J., Shu, Y., Liu, L., Kong, L., Yang, L., Wang, B., Sun, G., Ji, Y., Cao, G., Liu, H., Cui, T., Li, N., Qiu, W., Li, G., Hou, X., Luo, H., Xue, L., Zhang, Y., Yue, W., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Gao, S., Pan, Y., Galais, M.-P., Zaanan, A., Ma, Z., Li, H., Wang, Y., & Shen, L.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-04-19
Volume
377
Pages
e068714
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224260137
Cited by
485
References
25
FWCI
84.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj-2021-068714
The paper
Lu, Z., Wang, J., Shu, Y., Liu, L., Kong, L., Yang, L., Wang, B., Sun, G., Ji, Y., Cao, G., Liu, H., Cui, T., Li, N., Qiu, W., Li, G., Hou, X., Luo, H., Xue, L., Zhang, Y., . . . Shen, L. (2022). Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068714

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.