Cited by 545Birth, Development, and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDietary Effects on Health

Does malnutrition in utero determine diabetes and coronary heart disease in adulthood? Results from the Leningrad siege study, a cross sectional study

Open access
Stanner, S A, Bulmer, K, Andrès, C, Lantseva, O E, Borodina, V, Poteen, V V, Yudkin, J S·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To investigate the relation between decreased maternal food intake and risk factors for coronary heart disease in adult Design: Cross sectional study. Subjects: 169 subjects exposed to malnutrition in utero (intrauterine group) during the siege of Leningrad (now St Petersburg) in 1941-4; 192 subjects born in Leningrad just before rationing began, before the siege (infant group); and 188 subjects born concurrently with the first two groups but outside the area of the siege (unexposed group). Setting: Ott Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Petersburg. Main outcome measures: Development of risk factors for coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus—obesity, blood pressure, glucose tolerance, insulin concentrations, lipids, albumin excretion rate, and clotting factors. Results: There was no difference between the subjects exposed to starvation in utero and those starved during infant life in: ( a ) glucose tolerance (mean fasting glucose: intrauterine group 5.2(95% confidence interval 5.1 to 5.3), infant group 5.3 (5.1 to 5.5), P=0.94; mean 2 hour glucose: intrauterine group 6.1 (5.8 to 6.4), infant group 6.0 (5.7 to 6.3), P=0.99);( b ) insulin concentration; ( c ) blood pressure; ( d )lipid concentration; or ( e ) coagulation factors. Concentrations of von Willebrand factor were raised in the intrauterine group (156.5 (79.1 to 309.5)) compared with the infant group (127.6 (63.9 to 254.8); P<0.001), and female subjects in the intrauterine group had a stronger interaction between obesity and both systolic (P=0.01) and diastolic (P=0.04) blood pressure than in the infant group. Short adult stature was associated with raised concentrations of glucose and insulin 2 hours after a glucose load—independently of siege exposure. Subjects in the unexposed group had non-systematic differences in subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio, diastolic blood pressure, and clotting factors compared with the exposed groups. Conclusions :Intrauterine malnutrition was not associated with glucose intolerance, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Subjects exposed to malnutrition showed evidence of endothelial dysfunction and a stronger influence of obesity on blood pressure. Key messages Relations between intrauterine growth and adult disease such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease have been linked to poor nutrition during pregnancy In this study, however, intrauterine exposure to malnutrition was not associated with glucose intolerance Intrauterine malnutrition did not affect insulin concentration, blood pressure, or concentration of lipids or coagulation factors Concentration of von Willebrand factor, a marker of endothelial damage, was raised in the subjects exposed to intrauterine malnutrition Obesity and blood pressure were more strongly related in subjects exposed to intrauterine malnutrition than in subjects either unexposed to malnutrition or exposed to malnutrition only as infants

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1342

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between famine exposure and increased insulin resistance was not observed in the Leningrad Siege Study.

    “However, this association was not observed in another famine cohort study, the Leningrad Siege Study (55).”

    From Globalization of Diabetes (2011) · cites this paper as [55]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanner, S. A., Bulmer, K., Andrès, C., Lantseva, O. E., Borodina, V, Poteen, V. V., & Yudkin, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Whittington Hospital (GB)
  • Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after D.O. Ott (RU)
Corresponding author
Stanner, S A
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-11-22
Volume
315
Issue
7119
Pages
1342-1348
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2047372093
Cited by
545
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
FWCI
13.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
famine, Siege of Leningrad, coronary risk factors, diabetes mellitus, glucose tolerance, insulin, von Willebrand factor, blood pressure, obesity, adult height, maternal diet, coagulation factors, lipids, urinary albumin excretion rate, sex differences, skinfold thickness
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Body Height, Coronary Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Disorders, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Russia, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review