Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence based cardiology: Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systematic review of prospective cohort studies

Open access
Hemingway, H., Marmot, M.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

Summary points: In healthy populations, prospective cohort studies show a possible aetiological role for typeA/hostility (6/14 studies), depression andanxiety (11/11 studies), psychosocial workcharacteristics (6/10 studies), social support(5/8 studies). In populations of patients with coronary heartdisease, prospective studies show a prognosticrole for depression and anxiety (6/6 studies),psychosocial work characteristics (1/2 studies),and social support (9/10 studies); none of fivestudies showed a prognostic role for typeA/hostility. Although this review can not discount thepossibility of publication bias, prospective cohortstudies provide strong evidence that psychosocialfactors, particularly depression and social support,are independent aetiological and prognosticfactors for coronary heart disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1460

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Items 101–113 of 113

Metadata

Authors
Hemingway, H., & Marmot, M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-05-29
Volume
318
Issue
7196
Pages
1460-1467
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2042280485
Cited by
1,340
References
5
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.