Cited by 313Acupuncture Treatment Research StudiesMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Randomised trial of acupuncture compared with conventional massage and “sham” laser acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck painCommentary: Controls for acupuncture—can we finally see the light?

Open access
Irnich, Dominik, Cummings, Mike, Behrens, Nicolas, Molzen, Holger, König, Achim, Gleditsch, Jochen, Krauss, Martin, Natalis, Malte +3 more·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of acupuncture and conventional massage for the treatment of chronic neck pain. Design: Prospective, randomised, placebo controlled trial. Setting: Three outpatient departments in Germany. Participants: 177 patients aged 18–85 years with chronic neck pain. Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to five treatments over three weeks with acupuncture (56), massage (60), or “sham” laser acupuncture (61). Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measure: maximum pain related to motion (visual analogue scale) irrespective of direction of movement one week after treatment. Secondary outcome measures: range of motion (3D ultrasound real time motion analyser), pain related to movement in six directions (visual analogue scale), pressure pain threshold (pressure algometer), changes of spontaneous pain, motion related pain, global complaints (seven point scale), and quality of life (SF-36). Assessments were performed before, during, and one week and three months after treatment. Patients' beliefs in treatment were assessed. Results: One week after five treatments the acupuncture group showed a significantly greater improvement in motion related pain compared with massage (difference 24.22 (95% confidence interval 16.5 to 31.9), P=0.0052) but not compared with sham laser (17.28 (10.0 to 24.6), P=0.327). Differences between acupuncture and massage or sham laser were greater in the subgroup who had had pain for longer than five years (n=75) and in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (n=129). The acupuncture group had the best results in most secondary outcome measures. There were no differences in patients' beliefs in treatment. Conclusions: Acupuncture is an effective short term treatment for patients with chronic neck pain, but there is only limited evidence for long term effects after five treatments. What is already known on this topic: Acupuncture is a widespread complementary treatment Evidence from trials have given conflicting results on its use in the treatment of neck pain because of methodological shortcomings and because effects were compared either with alternative treatments or with different sham procedures imitating acupuncture, but not both What this study adds: Compared with sham laser acupuncture and massage, needle acupuncture has beneficial effects on mobility and pain related to motion in patients with chronic neck pain Acupuncture was clearly more effective than massage, but differences were not always significant compared with sham laser acupuncture Acupuncture was the best treatment for patients with the myofascial syndrome and those who had had pain for longer than five years

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.322.7302.1574

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eight trials did not use adequate method of allocation concealment.

    “Although all studies adopted random assignment of patients, eight trials did not use adequate method of allocation concealment [17–20, 23, 25, 30, 31].”

    From Efficacy of Massage Therapy on Pain and Dysfunction in Patients with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Randomisation section reports that this trial randomly allocated patients using a software-generated block randomisation scheme. It does not assess whether allocation was adequately concealed or establish that eight trials lacked adequate concealment; the latter is a judgment about multiple studies, not a finding reported here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two RCTs assessed short-term effects of massage therapy compared with acupuncture after 12 weeks of follow-up (n = 111; SMD, −0.10; 95% CI −0.47 to 0.28).

    “With regard to pain relief, two RCTs assessed short-term effects of MT compared with acupuncture after 12 weeks of follow-up (n = 111; SMD, −0.10; 95% CI −0.47 to 0.28, in Figure 4) [17]”

    From Efficacy of Massage Therapy on Pain and Dysfunction in Patients with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Abstract describes one randomised trial comparing massage with acupuncture, with assessment three months after treatment. The Secondary outcome measures section reports that differences in pain outcomes were small and no longer significant at that point. This paper does not report two RCTs or the pooled n = 111 and SMD with confidence interval cited in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study reported that 21% of the participants experienced low blood pressure following treatment.

    “One study reported that 21% of the participants experienced low blood pressure following treatment [17].”

    From Efficacy of Massage Therapy on Pain and Dysfunction in Patients with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Side effects section reports low blood pressure among the mild reactions experienced by 33% of acupuncture participants, but does not give a percentage for low blood pressure specifically. The 21% figure refers to mild reactions in the sham-laser group, not to participants with low blood pressure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Massage therapy did not show better immediate effects for neck pain than active therapies (SMD 0.13; 95% CI −0.38 to 0.63; P = 0.63).

    “The meta-analysis did not show favorable effects of MT on pain reduction (n = 308; SMD, 0.13; 95% CI, −0.38 to 0.63; P = 0.63; heterogeneity: χ 2 = 12.70, P = 0.005, I 2 = 76%; Figure 2(a)).”

    From Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2013) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Main outcome measure and Secondary outcome measures sections report that acupuncture reduced motion-related pain more than massage immediately after treatment and one week later, supporting the limited point that massage did not outperform that active treatment. This paper is a trial of 177 patients, not the cited meta-analysis of 308; it does not report the pooled SMD, confidence interval, or P value in the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Massage therapy did not show significant effects on neck pain in followup (SMD −0.09; 95% CI −0.43 to 0.26; P = 0.62).

    “The meta-analysis did not show significant effects of MT on pain in followup (n = 131; SMD, −0.09; 95% CI, −0.43 to 0.26; P = 0.62; heterogeneity: χ 2 = 0.14, P = 0.71, I 2 = 0%; Figure 3).”

    From Massage Therapy for Neck and Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2013) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Secondary outcome measures section reports that differences in pain between massage and acupuncture were no longer significant three months after treatment; the Discussion describes massage as having only a weak effect. This paper is a single trial, however, and does not report the cited meta-analysis or its pooled SMD, confidence interval, and P value. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Irnich D. Acupuncture in complaints of the locomotor system, especially of the cervical syndrome [Akupunktur bei Beschwerden des Bewe- gungssystems am Beispiel des HWS-Syndrom]. Deutsch Z Akupunkt 1999;2:81-90.
  2. Natalis M, König A. Noninvasive, accurate and reliable measurement of cervical spine motion with a 3D real-time ultrasound motion analyzer [Nichtinvasive, akkurate und reliable Messung der Halswirbelsäulenbe- weglichkeit mittels ultraschallgestützter 3D-Echtzeitanalyse]. Ultraschall Med 1999;20:70-3.
  3. Bogduk N. Neck pain. Aust Fam Physician 1984;13:26-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irnich, D., Cummings, M., Behrens, N., Molzen, H., König, A., Gleditsch, J., Krauss, M., Natalis, M., Senn, E., Beyer, A., & Schöps, P.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Irnich, Dominik
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-06-30
Volume
322
Issue
7302
Pages
1574
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1520657679
Cited by
313
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
acupuncture, chronic neck pain, massage, myofascial pain syndrome, range of motion, pressure pain threshold, treatment beliefs, complementary therapy, quality of life, long-term treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Facial Neuralgia, Female, Humans, Male, Massage, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Acupuncture Analgesia, Confidence Intervals, Chi-Square Distribution, Neck Pain, Laser Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review