The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis
Open accessAbstract
When is it legitimate to exclude randomised patients from the analysis of data in clinical trials? Basing their analysis on the desirability of minimising bias and random error, the authors consider the circumstances when it may be possible to exclude patients, even in an intention to treat trial
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The effect of assignment to intervention should be estimated by an intention-to-treat analysis that includes all randomised participants. 17”
From RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Despite this, this style of analysis is less likely to show a positive treatment effect [94].”
From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone, R. C., BALK, R. A., Cerra, F. B., Dellinger, R. P., Fein, A. M., Knaus, W. A., Schein, R. M. H., & Sibbald, W. J. (1992) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 · Cited by 13,317
Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., & Smith, P. G. (1976) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1976.220 · Cited by 2,294
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670 · Cited by 2,160
Explanatory and Pragmatic Attitudes in Therapeutical Trials
Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.012 · Cited by 1,253
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials
Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0 · Cited by 1,185
Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Neuraminidase Inhibitor Oseltamivir in Treating Acute Influenza
Treanor, J. J., Hayden, F. G., Vrooman, P., Barbarash, R. A., Bettis, R. B., Riff, D. S., Singh, S., Kinnersley, N., Ward, P., Mills, R., et al. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.8.1016 · Cited by 1,019
Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative Research
NEWELL, D. J. (1992) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/21.5.837 · Cited by 715
Houbiers, J. G. A., Brand, A., van de Watering, L. M. G., van de Velde, C. J. H., Hermans, J., Verwey, P. J. M., Bijnen, A. B., Pahlplatz, P. V. M., SCHATTENKERK, M. E., Wobbes, T., et al. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91965-8 · Cited by 381
Vasopressin versus epinephrine for inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial
Stiell, I. G., Hébert, P. C., Wells, G. A., Vandemheen, K. L., Tang, A. S., Higginson, L., Dreyer, J. F., Clement, C. M., Battram, E., Watpool, I., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05328-4 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980215)17:3<303::AID-SIM764>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 710
Rehal, S., Cro, S., Phillips, P. P. J., Fielding, K., & Carpenter, J. R. (2023) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745231176773 · Cited by 14
“Excluding such patients will not introduce bias since their exclusion is not influenced by post-randomisation events.(19)”
BackgroundPagsberg, A. K., Jeppesen, P., Klauber, D. G., Jensen, K. G., Rudå, D., Stentebjerg-Olesen, M., Jantzen, P., Rasmussen, S., Saldeen, E. A.-S., Lauritsen, M.-B. G., et al. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-199 · Cited by 14
“In short, the primary analysis will be according to the modified intention-to-treat principle [83] with adjustment for the protocol specified stratification variables [84].”
BackgroundWiberg, S. C., Hassager, C., Thomsen, J. H., Frydland, M. S., Høfsten, D. E., Engstrøm, T., Køber, L., Schmidt, H., Møller, J. E., & Kjærgaard, J. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1421-2 · Cited by 14
“follow-up included in the denominator [22].”
Con: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have failed in the study of dialysis methods
Twardowski, Z. J., Misra, M., & Singh, A. K. (2013) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs307 · Cited by 14
Revisão sistemática e meta-análise da antibioticoprofilaxia na histerectomia abdominal
da Costa, R. J. M., & Silva, L. K. (2004) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x2004000800013 · Cited by 14
Early application of generic mortality risk scores in presumed meningococcal disease*
Festa, M. S., Tibby, S. M., Taylor, D. J., Durward, A., Habibi, P., & Murdoch, I. A. (2005) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.pcc.0000149132.51906.13 · Cited by 14
“Several reasons for this have been postulated, including overestimation of baseline mortality, inappropriate selection criteria secondary to outdated mortality-risk models, and delay in administration of the therapy under trial (7, 8).”
BackgroundCritical Illness Neuromyopathy
Jonghe, B. D., & Finfer, S. R. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200612-1762ed · Cited by 14
Hüzmeli̇, İ., Katayıfçı, N., Yalçın, F., & Hüzmeli, E. D. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1155/2024/4136457 · Cited by 13
“Te ITTanalysis facilitates comparing individuals in both the experimental and control groups based on their random assignment to these groups [27].”
MethodAntibiotic prophylaxis for leptospirosis
Win, T. Z., Perinpanathan, T., Mukadi, P., Smith, C. E., Edwards, T., Han, S. M., Maung, H. T., Brett‐Major, D. M., & Lee, N. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014959.pub2 · Cited by 15
Abaraogu, U. O., Dall, P., Brittenden, J., Stuart, W. P., Tew, G. A., Godwin, J., & Seenan, C. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3307-6 · Cited by 13
Hanley‐Cook, G., Toe, L. C., Tesfamariam, K., de Kok, B., Argaw, A., Compaoré, A., Ouédraogo, M., Dailey-Chwalibóg, T., Kolsteren, P. W., Lachat, C. K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/nxac171 · Cited by 16
“, not meeting the a priori–defined study inclusion criteria) (28).”
BackgroundBuggeskov, K. B., Wetterslev, J., Secher, N. H., Andersen, L. W., Jonassen, T. E. N., & Steinbrüchel, D. A. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-30 · Cited by 13
“Two bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) are performed using a flexible video 6 mm bronchoscope after induction of anesthesia and following termination of CPB [17].”
MethodSevoflurane in acute myocardial infarction: A pilot randomized study
Lavi, S., Bainbridge, D., D’Alfonso, S., Diamantouros, P., Syed, J., Jablonsky, G., & Lavi, R. (2014) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.009 · Cited by 13
Zhang, T., Guo, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhou, S., & Xu, S. (2018) · Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics · doi:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_862_17 · Cited by 13
Kahale, L. A., Guyatt, G. H., Agoritsas, T., Briel, M., Busse, J. W., Carrasco‐Labra, A., Khamis, A. M., Zhang, Y., Hooft, L., Scholten, R. J. P. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.003 · Cited by 13
Self-citationMachulska, A., Kleinke, K., Eiler, T. J., Grünewald, A., Brück, R., Jahn, K., Niehaves, B., Gethmann, C. F., & Klucken, T. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3835-0 · Cited by 13
Manikandan, S. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.64540 · Cited by 13
Childs, J. D., Teyhen, D. S., Wyngaarden, J. J. V., Dougherty, B. F., Ladislas, B. J., Helton, G. L., Robinson, M. E., Wu, S. S., & George, S. Z. (2011) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-132 · Cited by 13
“According to Straus et al, follow-up rates that exceed 95% minimize the potential for attrition bias to exist whereas follow-up rates lower than 80% pose a threat to external validity [2,3].”
BackgroundSensory distribution of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block – a randomised, blinded trial
Nersesjan, M., Hägi‐Pedersen, D., Andersen, J. H., Mathiesen, O., Dahl, J. B., Broeng, L., & Thybo, K. H. (2018) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aas.13091 · Cited by 13
McIsaac, D. I., Fergusson, D. A., Khadaroo, R. G., Meliambro, A., Muscedere, J., Gillis, C., Hladkowicz, E., & Taljaard, M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064165 · Cited by 12
Self-citationFroessler, B., Schubert, K. O., Palm, P., Church, R., Aboustate, N., Kelly, T., Dekker, G., & Hodyl, N. A. (2022) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17288 · Cited by 11
van Veenendaal, N., Poelman, M. M., Apers, J. A., Cense, H. A., Schreurs, H., Sonneveld, E., van der Velde, S., & Bonjer, H. J. (2023) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-023-10446-7 · Cited by 12
“Minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the field of surgery with benefits that include reduced postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activities, and fewer postoperative complications compared to open techniques [1].”
BackgroundInfluentialPanchamia, J. K., Smith, H. M., Sánchez‐Sotelo, J., Vinsard, P. A., Duncan, C. M., Njathi-Ori, C. W., Larson, D. R., Esper, R. N., Sperling, J. W., Jacob, A. K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.051 · Cited by 12
Personalized High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression
Jog, M., Norris, V., Pfeiffer, P., Taraku, B., Kozikowski, S. D., Schneider, J., Boucher, M., Iacoboni, M., Woods, R., & Narr, K. L. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.31189 · Cited by 12
Ahmad, F., Lou, W. Y. W., Shakya, Y. B., Ginsburg, L. R., Ng, P., Rashid, M., Dincâ-Panaitescu, Ş., Ledwos, C., & McKenzie, K. J. (2017) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20160118 · Cited by 12
Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles
Kelley, B., & Chung, K. C. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000004031 · Cited by 12
Armijo-Olivo, S. L., Machalicek, W., Dennett, L., & Ballenberger, N. (2021) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.20.06428-x · Cited by 13
Acras, R. N., Pedroso, M. L. A., Caum, L. C., Pisani, J. C., Amarante, H. M. B. D. S., & Carmes, E. R. (2004) · Arquivos de Gastroenterologia · doi:10.1590/s0004-28032004000100002 · Cited by 12
Naumann, J., Sadaghiani, C., Bureau, N., Schmidt, S., & Huber, R. (2016) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1241-7 · Cited by 12
“[23], this socalled post-randomization exclusion from the primary analysis may be legitimate if patients have not received the intervention.”
BackgroundInterpretation and display of research results
Kulkarni, D. K. (2016) · Indian Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/0019-5049.190622 · Cited by 12
“[3] If these extreme data points are deleted, they should be reported as “excluded from analysis”.[4]”
BackgroundBatista, K. B. D. S. L., Thiruvenkatachari, B., & O'Brien, K. D. (2018) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.08.013 · Cited by 12
Mennitto, A., Verzoni, E., Cognetti, F., Miceli, R., Milella, M., Mosca, A., Chiuri, V. E., Bearz, A., Morelli, F., Ortega, C., et al. (2021) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2021.1879639 · Cited by 12
Bricker, J. B., Mull, K. E., Sullivan, B. M., & Forman, E. M. (2021) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab012 · Cited by 11
Machulska, A., Eiler, T. J., Haßler, B., Kleinke, K., Brück, R., Jahn, K., Niehaves, B., & Klucken, T. (2023) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-023-01107-w · Cited by 11
“Missing values were replaced through multiple imputation and the intention-to-treat (ITT) principles (Fergusson et al. 2002).”
Subscapularis-sparing approaches in shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review
Lee, S., Sardar, H., Horner, N. S., Mana, L. A., Miller, B. S., Khan, M., & Alolabi, B. (2021) · Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.034 · Cited by 11
A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
Kay, J., Memon, M., de SA, D. L., Simunovic, N., Musahl, V., Fu, F. H., Karlsson, J., & Ayeni, O. R. (2017) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.16.01408 · Cited by 11
Karger, R., Stangenberg, K., Hinrichs, F., GRISS, P., & Kretschmer, V. (2004) · Transfusion Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.0958-7578.2004.00526.x · Cited by 11
Grant, M. C., Kon, Z. N., Joshi, A., Christenson, E. S., Kallam, S., Burris, N. S., Gu, J., & Poston, R. S. (2008) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.047 · Cited by 11
“These patients were considered “inappropriately randomized” and were excluded from analysis as a justifiable exception to the “intention to treat” principle [12], leaving a total of 120 patients (n = 59 aprotinin, 61 placebo).”
BackgroundMcClinton, S. M., Flynn, T. W., Heiderscheit, B. C., McPoil, T. G., Pinto, D., Duffy, P. A., & Bennett, J. D. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-414 · Cited by 11
“Post-randomization exclusion of included participants that did not meet eligibility criteria or that did not receive intervention will be considered for exclusion of the analysis by an independent, blinded adjudication committee that will evaluate all randomized participants [57].”
MethodProbst, H., & Ramlaul, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37944-5_12 · Cited by 11
A longitudinal study of neurodevelopmental delay in HIV infected children
Potterton, J. L. (2008) · University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Institutional Repository on DSpace (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg) · Cited by 11
Prophylactic Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Acetaminophen
Rozé, J., Cambonie, G., Flamant, C., Patkaï, J., Muehlbacher, T., Gascoin-Lachambre, G., Novais, A. R. B., Tauzin, M., Duc, K. L., Beuchée, A., et al. (2026) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.6150 · Cited by 10
USSHER, M. H., Best, C. S., Lewis, S., McKell, J., Coleman, T. J., Cooper, S. E., Orton, S., & Bauld, L. (2024) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16487 · Cited by 10
Wernli, K. J., Knerr, S. A., Li, T., Leppig, K. A., Ehrlich, K. J., Farrell, D. W., Gao, H., Bowles, E. J. A., Graham, A. L., Luta, G., et al. (2020) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkaa114 · Cited by 10
Khan, N. A., Torralba, K. D., & Aslam, F. (2021) · RMD Open · doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001708 · Cited by 10
“Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.”
Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy
Motamedi, M. A. K., Mak, N. T., Brown, C. J., Raval, M. J., Karimuddin, A. A., Giustini, D., & Phang, P. T. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002198.pub3 · Cited by 10
van Ginkel, D. J., Bor, W. L., Dubois, C., Aarts, H. M., Rooijakkers, M. J. P., van Bergeijk, K. H., Rosseel, L., Veenstra, L. F., Backer, O. D., Mieghem, N. M. V., et al. (2023) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eij-d-23-00206 · Cited by 10
Vester‐Andersen, M., Waldau, T. E., Wetterslev, J., Møller, M. H., Rosenberg, J., Jørgensen, L. N., Gillesberg, I., Jakobsen, H. L., Hansen, E. G., Poulsen, L. M., et al. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-37 · Cited by 10
“The outcome measures will be analysed for all randomised patients in a modified intention-to-treat analysis leading to the primary results of the trial [46].”
MethodVázquez, F. L., Torres, Á., Otero, P., Blanco, V., López, L., García-Casal, A., & Arrojo, M. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3859-5 · Cited by 11
“If a mental disorder is detected at post-intervention or any follow-up, the participant will be excluded from the study retrospectively [71].”
BackgroundThe efficacy and acceptability of the Triple P: Positive Parenting Program with Turkish parents
Arkan, B., Güvenir, T., Ralph, A., & Day, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing · doi:10.1111/jcap.12283 · Cited by 10
Schoenfeld, E. M., Poronsky, K. E., Westafer, L. M., DiFronzo, B. M., Visintainer, P., Scales, C. D., Hess, E. P., & Lindenauer, P. K. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05140-9 · Cited by 10
Busse, J. W., & Guyatt, G. H. (2009) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/erp.09.7 · Cited by 10
Self-citationFourcade, L., Boutron, I., Moher, D., Ronceray, L., Baron, G., & Ravaud, P. (2007) · PLoS Clinical Trials · doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0020022 · Cited by 10
“Reproducibility issues have been raised regardless of the chosen quality tool [14], because inconsistently defined items such as blinding [15], dropout and withdrawals [16], or an intention-to-treat analysis [17–20] are used and are poorly understood by reviewers.”
Methodfor the EuroHYP-1 trial investigators, Winkel, P., Bath, P. M., Gluud, C. N., Lindschou, J., van der Worp, H. B., Macleod, M. R., Szabo, I., Durand‐Zaleski, I., & Schwab, S. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2302-z · Cited by 9
Corticosteroids for treatment of leptospirosis
Win, T. Z., Tabei, K., Mukadi, P., Edwards, T., Smith, C. E., & Lee, N. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014935 · Cited by 8
Planert, J., Machulska, A., Hildebrand, A. S., Roesmann, K., Otto, E., & Klucken, T. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06366-x · Cited by 10
“Based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, non-compliance to the treatment or deviation from the treatment plan will not lead to the exclusion of participants [58].”
BackgroundStatistical analysis plan for the Augmented versus Routine Approach to Giving Energy Trial (TARGET)
Peake, S. (2018) · Critical Care and Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/s1441-2772(23)00727-5 · Cited by 9
van Oenen, F. J., Schipper, S., Van, R., Schoevers, R. A., Visch, I., Peen, J., & Dekker, J. (2013) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-13-331 · Cited by 10
“Excluding patients from an analysis does not necessarily bias the results, provided that certain requirements are met, for instance that intention-to-treat applies to all randomised patients [49].”
BackgroundStandardised feeding regimens: hope for reducing the risk of necrotising enterocolitis
Premji, S. (2005) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/adc.2004.063198 · Cited by 9
Vamvakas, E. C. (2008) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01089.x · Cited by 9
Interventions to address mathematics anxiety: An overview and recommendationsPreprint
Petronzi, D., Hunt, T. E., & Sheffield, D. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a46eh · Cited by 13
Chalmers, I., Matthews, R., Glasziou, P., Boutron, I., & Armitage, P. (2023) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/01410768231203936 · Cited by 9
Köhler, M., Paul, F., Janke, K., Sturtz, S., Preukschat, D., Ostlender, S., Kerekes, M. F., & Kaiser, T. (2025) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-025-04338-7 · Cited by 8
“Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias for all relevant studies using criteria commonly applied to RCTs [40– 49].”
Rasmussen, R. S., Juhler, M., & Wetterslev, J. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-228 · Cited by 8
“Analyses will be conducted according to the modified intention-to-treat principle [6].”
MethodHamilton, N. N., Tedde, M. L., Wolosker, N., Aguiar, W. W. S., Ferreira, H. P. D. C., de Oliveira, H. A., Lima, A. M. R., Westphal, F. L., de Oliveira, M. V. B., Riuto, F. D. O., et al. (2020) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100618 · Cited by 8
Pentoxifylline in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Colombia
Castro, M. D. M., Cossio, A., Navas, A., Fernández, O. L., Valderrama, L., Cuervo‐Pardo, L., Marquez-Oñate, R., Gómez, M. A., & Saravia, N. G. (2022) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens11030378 · Cited by 8
“Therefore, the risk of bias for excluding these patients is low [34].”
BackgroundEpinephrine vs placebo in neonatal resuscitation: ROSC and brain MRS/MRI in term piglets
Andersen, H. B., Andersen, M. H., Andelius, T. C. K., Pedersen, M. V., Løfgren, B., Pedersen, M., Ringgaard, S., Kyng, K. J., & Henriksen, T. B. (2022) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-022-02126-4 · Cited by 9
Muñoz-Martínez, T., Castañeda-Saiz, A., Vinuesa-Lozano, C., Aretxabala-Kortajarena, N., Dudagoitia-Otaolea, J. L., Diarasarri, S. I., Ruiz-Zorrilla, J. M., Hernández-López, M., & Castillo-Arenal, C. (2009) · Medicina Intensiva · doi:10.1016/j.medin.2009.10.004 · Cited by 8
Terasawa, T., Hamashima, C., Kato, K., Miyashiro, I., Yoshikawa, T., Takaku, R., & Nishida, H. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026002 · Cited by 8
Andersen, L. W., Sindberg, B., Holmberg, M. J. J., Isbye, D. L., Kjærgaard, J., Zwisler, S. T., Darling, S., Larsen, J. M., Rasmussen, B. S., Løfgren, B., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100081 · Cited by 8
“In a double-blind trial, this approach is unbiased while increasing precision.(22)”
MethodLessening Organ Dysfunction With Vitamin C (LOVIT) Trial: Statistical Analysis Plan
Adhikari, N. K. J., Pinto, R. L., Day, A. G., Masse, M.-H., Ménard, J., Sprague, S., Annane, D., Arabi, Y. M., Battista, M., Cohen, D., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/36261 · Cited by 10
“…did not receive the assigned intervention; (3) blinding was maintained; and (4) 2 members of the steering committee blinded to allocation agree that the participant was mistakenly randomized after review of information from medical records available at the time of randomization [21,22].”
Self-citationMay, A. M., van Weert, E., Korstjens, I., Hoekstra‐Weebers, J. E. H. M., van der Schans, C. P., Zonderland, M. L., Mesters, I., van den Borne, B. H. P., & Ros, W. J. G. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.018 · Cited by 8
“21 Changes in outcome variables from baseline to postinter-vention were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.”
MethodSadr‐Azodi, O., & Andrén‐Sandberg, Å. (2009) · Digestive Surgery · doi:10.1159/000229992 · Cited by 8
“Thus, it is the responsibility of the investigators to make sure that a planned study has sufficient precision and statistical power to test a given hypothesis.When analyzing the results of a randomized trial, investigators may be tempted to exclude some particular individuals, such as those erroneously included in a…”
BackgroundMurray, D., Meldrum, D., Moloney, R., Campion, A., Horgan, F., & Hardiman, O. M. (2012) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-157 · Cited by 8
Cirocchi, R., Mari, G. M., Amato, B., Tebala, G. D., Popivanov, G., Avenia, S., & Nascimbeni, R. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11040917 · Cited by 8
“The analysis of RCTs was performed by the intention-to-treat analysis [15] and the Mantel–Haenszel method [16].”
MethodHallstrom, A. P., & Paradis, N. A. (2005) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.008 · Cited by 8
“Although uncommon in the ordinary course of clinical trials, there are instances when inclusion criteria have been obtained but not evaluated prior to randomization, and subsequently, after the information was evaluated, patients not meeting inclusion criteria were dropped from the trial [9,10].”
BackgroundPlatelet-Rich Plasma for Chronic Tennis Elbow: Letters to the Editor
Aspenberg, P., & Ranstam, J. (2014) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546513512784 · Cited by 8
“However, as it stands we do not believe that PRP has demonstrated that it adds anything to the use of nonoperative approaches such as watchful waiting16 or a progressive exercise program1,4,5,10,15 or indeed local anesthetic at 12 weeks, as stated in their own data.13 Therefore, until there is clear evidence of additi…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlMuhaya, A. H., Albarrati, A., Alhowimel, A., & Alodaibi, F. (2023) · International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.26603/001c.68141 · Cited by 10
Intention-to-Treat Analysis in Clinical Research
Armijo-Olivo, S. L., da Silva, J. B., de Castro‐Carletti, E. M., de Oliveira‐Souza, A. I. S., Pelai, E. B., Mohamad, N., Baghbaninaghadehi, F., Dennett, L., Steen, J. P., Kumbhare, D. A., et al. (2024) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002444 · Cited by 8
“…of their compliance with the treatment of interest, the results could likely be biased toward the null hypothesis (underestimation of true effects) 29 in presence of noncompliance compared with what it would have achieved if every participant followed the assigned treatment plan and, hence,…”
Ebrahimjee, A., Hodsoll, J. P., Valmaggia, L., Hickling, L. M., & Riches, S. (2024) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x2400028x · Cited by 10
“…the inclusion of which provides a more reliable estimate of clinical effectiveness, mirroring clinical practice (i.e. non-compliance, protocol violations, attrition while preserving sample size and minimising Type 1 errors and bias related to incomplete data; Fergusson et al ., 2002; Gupta, 2011).”
Sørensen, S. S., Jensen, M. B., Pedersen, K. M., & Ehlers, L. H. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.001 · Cited by 7
“These two intervention patients were excluded from further analysis to enhance precision of the CUA estimates [24].”
BackgroundMethodDetailed statistical analysis plan for the difficult airway management (DIFFICAIR) trial
Nørskov, A. K., Lundstrøm, L. H., Rosenstock, C. V., & Wetterslev, J. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-173 · Cited by 7
“Main analyses will be according to ITT adjusted for cluster and stratification variables.”
MethodInfluentialMercier, R. J. (2017) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002386 · Cited by 7
One-year outcome of the sevoflurane in acute myocardial infarction randomized trial
Lavi, S., Alemayehu, M., McCarty, D., Warrington, J. C., & Lavi, R. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0456-2 · Cited by 7
Dugravot, A., Sabia, S., Shipley, M. J., Welch, C. A., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Singh‐Manoux, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132110 · Cited by 7
Chang, X., Wang, Z., & Yang, L. (2016) · Molecular and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.3892/mco.2016.910 · Cited by 7
“Finally, an assessment was made as to whether the trial results used intention-to-treat analysis (30,31).”
Dirnagl, U. (2010) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-750-1_19 · Cited by 7
Murray, D., Hardiman, O. M., Campion, A., Vance, R. C., Horgan, F., & Meldrum, D. (2016) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215516661225 · Cited by 7
Presneill, J., Gantner, D. C., Nichol, A., McArthur, C. J., Forbes, A. B., Kasza, J., Trapani, T. V., Murray, L., Bernard, S. A., Cameron, P. A., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2610-y · Cited by 8
“The main primary and secondary analyses will follow an ITT approach to define the full analysis patient set, based on all randomly assigned patients after the eightpatient run-in period, except those withdrawing consent for use of all trial data and those not fulfilling inclusion criteria and never receiving the inter…”
MethodHamid, E. A., Aziz, S. A., Sadek, H. S., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.16423.1 · Cited by 7
USSHER, M. H., Best, C. S., Lewis, S., McKell, J., Coleman, T. J., Cooper, S., Orton, S., & Bauld, L. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05480-6 · Cited by 7
Jacobs, W. L., Schagen, S. B., Brouwer, S. M., Kieffer, J. M., Baas, I. O., Los, M., Sonke, G. S., & Das, E. (2022) · Clinical Breast Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.001 · Cited by 7
Bagshaw, S. M., & Wald, R. (2019) · Critical Care and Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/s1441-2772(23)00524-0 · Cited by 8
Srivastava, D. K., Rai, S. N., & Pan, J. (2006) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200610265 · Cited by 7
Evaluating the Internal Validity of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Turlik, M. (2009) · The Foot and Ankle Online Journal · doi:10.3827/faoj.2009.0203.0005 · Cited by 7
Which Randomized Controlled Trials Are Relevant to Clinical Practice?
Collins, J. A. (2005) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000173316.14537.7d · Cited by 7
Treatment for anemia in people with AIDS
Martí-Carvajal, A. J., & Solà, I. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004776.pub2 · Cited by 7
Orozco, N., García-Gallardo, G., Cavalcanti, A. B., dos Santos, T. M., Ospina-Tascón, G. A., Bakker, J., Morales, S., Ramos, K., Alegría, L., Teboul, J., et al. (2025) · Critical Care Science · doi:10.62675/2965-2774.20250140 · Cited by 6
Ory, M. G., Han, G., Nsobundu, C., Carpenter, K., Towne, S. D., & Smith, M. L. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1543298 · Cited by 11
“This ITT analysis was in compliance with the CONSORT statement and employed because it can preserve the baseline balance of the arms and prevent selection bias and confounding (52, 53).”
Mccormack, L. A., Edlund, M. J., Thomas, S., Wu, L.-T. T., Chelminski, P. R., Archer, K. R., Wagner, L., Hirsch, S. C., Thompson, J. E., Dolor, R. J., et al. (2025) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaf049 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Fergusson, D., Aaron, S. D., Guyatt, G., & Hébert, P.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fergusson, Dean
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-09-21
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 7365
- Pages
- 652-654
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC1124168
- OpenAlex
- W2000522086
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 17.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- intention-to-treat analysis, randomized controlled trials, random error, statistical analysis of clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review