The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis
Open accessAbstract
When is it legitimate to exclude randomised patients from the analysis of data in clinical trials? Basing their analysis on the desirability of minimising bias and random error, the authors consider the circumstances when it may be possible to exclude patients, even in an intention to treat trial
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The effect of assignment to intervention should be estimated by an intention-to-treat analysis that includes all randomised participants. 17”
From RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Despite this, this style of analysis is less likely to show a positive treatment effect [94].”
From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone, R. C., BALK, R. A., Cerra, F. B., Dellinger, R. P., Fein, A. M., Knaus, W. A., Schein, R. M. H., & Sibbald, W. J. (1992) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 · Cited by 13,317
Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J., & Smith, P. G. (1976) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1976.220 · Cited by 2,294
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670 · Cited by 2,160
Explanatory and Pragmatic Attitudes in Therapeutical Trials
Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.012 · Cited by 1,253
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials
Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0 · Cited by 1,185
Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Neuraminidase Inhibitor Oseltamivir in Treating Acute Influenza
Treanor, J. J., Hayden, F. G., Vrooman, P., Barbarash, R. A., Bettis, R. B., Riff, D. S., Singh, S., Kinnersley, N., Ward, P., Mills, R., et al. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.8.1016 · Cited by 1,019
Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative Research
NEWELL, D. J. (1992) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/21.5.837 · Cited by 715
Houbiers, J. G. A., Brand, A., van de Watering, L. M. G., van de Velde, C. J. H., Hermans, J., Verwey, P. J. M., Bijnen, A. B., Pahlplatz, P. V. M., SCHATTENKERK, M. E., Wobbes, T., et al. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91965-8 · Cited by 381
Vasopressin versus epinephrine for inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised controlled trial
Stiell, I. G., Hébert, P. C., Wells, G. A., Vandemheen, K. L., Tang, A. S., Higginson, L., Dreyer, J. F., Clement, C. M., Battram, E., Watpool, I., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05328-4 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980215)17:3<303::AID-SIM764>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 710
Yelland, L. N., Kahan, B. C., Dent, E., Lee, K. J., Voysey, M., Forbes, A. B., & Cook, J. A. (2018) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774518761627 · Cited by 27
“Journal Lancet 32 (39) New England Journal of Medicine 30 (37) Journal of the American Medical Association 10 (12) Annals of Internal Medicine 5 (6) British Medical Journal 5 (6) Number of participants: median (range) 650 (40–84,496) Number of centres: median (range) 24 (1–1161) Number of treatment arms 2 71 (87) 3 6…”
BackgroundDaley, A., Riaz, M. A., Lewis, S., Aveyard, P. N., Coleman, T. J., Manyonda, I., West, R., Lewis, B. A., Marcus, B. H., Taylor, A. H., et al. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1784-3 · Cited by 28
“When using an intention to treat approach it is acceptable to exclude patients’ data, without risking bias, when ineligible patients are mistakenly randomised into a trial [38].”
MethodDaneman, N., Rishu, A. H., Pinto, R. L., Arabi, Y. M., Cook, D. J., Hall, R., McGuinness, S., Muscedere, J., Parke, R. L., Reynolds, S., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038300 · Cited by 28
Raina, J. S., Chawla, D., Jain, S., Khurana, S., Sehgal, A., & Rani, S. (2022) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.08.061 · Cited by 28
Nichol, A., Gantner, D. C., Presneill, J., Murray, L., Trapani, T. V., Bernard, S. A., Cameron, P. A., Capellier, G., Forbes, A. B., McArthur, C. J., et al. (2015) · Critical Care and Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/s1441-2772(23)01066-9 · Cited by 27
Cooke, M. L., Walker, R., Aitken, L. M., Freeman, A., Pavey, S., & Cantrill, R. M. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12223 · Cited by 27
The Intention-to-Treat Principle: A Primer for the Orthopaedic Surgeon
BUBBAR, V. K. (2006) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00240.top · Cited by 27
Pierce, M. A., Hess, E. P., Kline, J. A., Shah, N. D., Breslin, M., Branda, M. E., Pencille, L. J., Asplin, B. R., Nestler, D. M., Sadosty, A. T., et al. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-57 · Cited by 27
“The principle investigator, blinded to both allocation arm and patient outcome, will then consider post-randomization exclusion according to published recommendations [21].”
Bose, C. N., Persson, H., Björling, G., Ljunggren, G., Elfström, M. L., & Saboonchi, F. (2016) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1177/1474515115625033 · Cited by 27
Weight Loss Prior to Pregnancy and Early Gestational Glycemia: Prepare, a Randomized Clinical Trial
LeBlanc, E. S., Smith, N. X., Vesco, K. K., Hillier, T. A., & Stevens, V. J. (2021) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgab547 · Cited by 26
Zhang, Y., Chen, R., Tang, S., Sun, T., Yu, Y., Shi, R., Wang, K., Zeng, Z., Liu, X., Meng, Q., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000001642 · Cited by 26
“The data on patients can be excluded, as long as allocation to treatment arm cannot in fl uence the likelihood that patients receive the intervention [18] .”
BackgroundErythropoietin in traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Nichol, A., French, C., Little, L., Presneill, J., Cooper, D. J., Haddad, S. H., Duranteau, J., Huet, O., Skrifvars, M. B., Arabi, Y. M., et al. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-014-0528-6 · Cited by 26
Holst, L. B. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 26
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit trial: detailed statistical analysis plan
Krag, M., Perner, A., Wetterslev, J., Lange, T., Wise, M. P., Borthwick, M., Bendel, S., Pelosi, P. P., Keus, F., Guttormsen, A. B., et al. (2017) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aas.12917 · Cited by 26
“patients who were erroneously randomised AND who did not receive the trial intervention.(27)”
BackgroundLessening Organ dysfunction with VITamin C (LOVIT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial
on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Masse, M.-H., Ménard, J., Sprague, S., Battista, M., Cook, D. J., Guyatt, G. H., Heyland, D. K., Kanji, S., Pinto, R. L., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3834-1 · Cited by 27
“If ineligible participants are randomized, we will allow post-randomization exclusions if 1) the information about ineligibility was available at randomization; 2) two members of the Steering Committee blinded to allocation agree that the participant was mistakenly randomized after review of information from medical r…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHudson, T. A., Amaral, A. C. S., Stice, E. M., Gau, J. M., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2021) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.008 · Cited by 26
Motivating Healthy Diet Behaviors: The Self-as-Doer Identity
Brouwer, A. M., & Mosack, K. E. (2015) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1043335 · Cited by 26
Jongs, R., Harvey, L. A., Gwinn, T., & Lucas, B. R. (2012) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s1836-9553(12)70108-x · Cited by 26
Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC): human studies design and protocol
MoTrPAC Study Group, Jakicic, J. M., Kohrt, W. M., Houmard, J. A., Miller, M. E., Radom‐Aizik, S., Rasmussen, B. B., Ravussin, É., Serra, M. C., Stowe, C. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00102.2024 · Cited by 26
Whittaker, G. A., Munteanu, S. E., Menz, H. B., Gerrard, J. M., Elzarka, A., & Landorf, K. B. (2019) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8807 · Cited by 27
Halliday, K. E., Witek-McManus, S. S., Opondo, C., Mtali, A., Allen, E., Bauleni, A., Ndau, S., Phondiwa, E., Ali, D., Kachigunda, V., et al. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001666 · Cited by 25
Dexamethasone Dose and Early Postoperative Recovery after Mastectomy
Steinthorsdottir, K. J., Awada, H. N., Abildstrøm, H., Kroman, N. T., Kehlet, H., & Aasvang, E. K. (2020) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003112 · Cited by 25
Kawashima, A., & Evans, C. (2023) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-023-01131-6 · Cited by 25
“While there is no standardised level of loss to follow-up which attrition related bias was identified as a problem, Schulz and Grimes noted that the readers should be concerned about the possibility of bias when the attrition rate was 20% or greater [64].”
BackgroundSmith, D., Davis, J. P., Ureche, D. J., & Dumas, T. M. (2015) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2015.09.002 · Cited by 22
Randomized trial of two foam dressings in the management of chronic venous ulceration
Franks, P. J., Moody, M., Moffatt, C. J., Hiskett, G., Gatto, P., Davies, C., Furlong, W., Barrow, E., & Thomas, H. (2007) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2007.00205.x · Cited by 25
Kai, J., Middleton, L., DANIELS, J. P., Pattison, H. M., Tryposkiadis, K., & Gupta, J. K. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x687577 · Cited by 25
“The intention-to-treat analysis may be considered overly conservative by some – particularly given the long follow-up period - but alternatives such as per protocol analyses are likely to exaggerate treatment effects as they restrict analyses to only those patients happy with treatment performance.(24) While there was…”
MethodAnderson, R. T., Montori, V. M., Shah, N. D., Ting, H. H., Pencille, L. J., Demers, M., Kline, J. A., Diercks, D. B., Hollander, J. E., Torres, C. A., et al. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-166 · Cited by 25
“Though every effort will be made to minimize post-randomization exclusions, patients will be excluded after randomization if they are found to meet exclusion criteria that were not recognized at the time of enrollment or they choose to withdraw [28].”
BackgroundKrakow, B. J., McIver, N. D., Ulibarri, V. A., Krakow, J., & Schrader, R. M. (2019) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.011 · Cited by 24
Kendrick, D., Stewart, J., Smith, S. J., Coupland, C. A. C., Hopkins, N., Groom, L., Towner, E., Hayes, M., Gibson, D., Ryan, J., et al. (2010) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2009.175059 · Cited by 24
“In all, 124 participants were randomised. Data on participants excluded after randomisation and collection of baseline data on those who withdrew are included in the analysis of baseline data.”
BackgroundTreatment for anemia in people with AIDS
Martí-Carvajal, A. J., Solà, I., Peña-Martí, G. E., & Comunián-Carrasco, G. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004776.pub3 · Cited by 24
Regulatory decisions pertaining to aprotinin may be putting patients at risk
Hébert, P. C., Fergusson, D. A., Hutton, B., Mazer, C. D., Fremes, S. E., Blajchman, M. A., MacAdams, C. L., Wells, G. A., Robblee, J. A., Bussières, J. S., et al. (2014) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.131582 · Cited by 24
Self-citationSzajewska, H., Gawrońska, A., Woś, H., Banaszkiewicz, A., & Grzybowska‐Chlebowczyk, U. (2007) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0b013e31804c505b · Cited by 25
“A secondary analysis was done that excluded such patients (9).”
BackgroundMethodRen, Z., Zhou, S., Liu, Z., & Xu, S. (2015) · PubMed Central · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.08.14 · Cited by 23
“Finally, an assessment was made as to whether the trial results used intention to treat analysis (21,22).”
MethodFelau, S. M., Sales, L. P., Solis, M. Y., Hayashi, A. P., Roschel, H., de Sá‐Pinto, A. L., ANDRADE, D. C. O. D., Katayama, K. Y., Irigoyen, M. C., Consolim‐Colombo, F. M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00336 · Cited by 23
“In this context, ITT analysis has been regarded as more susceptible to type II error (22, 23), as the treatment effect may be diluted due to dropouts (23).”
MethodCalcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension
Zhu, J., Chen, N., Zhou, M., Guo, J., Zhu, C., Zhou, J., Ma, M., & He, L. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003654.pub5 · Cited by 28
Antibiotics for treatment of leptospirosis
Win, T. Z., Han, S. M., Edwards, T., Maung, H. T., Brett‐Major, D. M., Smith, C. E., & Lee, N. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014960.pub2 · Cited by 22
Holmberg, M. J. J., Andersen, L. W., Moskowitz, A. L., Berg, K. M., Cocchi, M. N., Chase, M., Liu, X., Kuhn, D. M., Grossestreuer, A. V., Hoeyer-Nielsen, A. K., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.041 · Cited by 22
Vi, S., Pham, D. D., Du, Y., Arora, H., & Tadakamadla, S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18084377 · Cited by 18
Online versus Offline Promotional Communication
Ieva, M., Ziliani, C., Gázquez‐Abad, J. C., & D’Attoma, I. (2017) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2017-040 · Cited by 22
Anderson, Y. C., Wynter, L. E., O'Sullivan, N. A., Wild, C. E. K., Grant, C. C., Cave, T. L., Derraik, J. G. B., & Hofman, P. L. (2020) · Pediatric Obesity · doi:10.1111/ijpo.12693 · Cited by 22
“Exclusions post allocation were peer reviewed with the medical team and deemed unlikely to be representative of participants in the study, with information post-randomization that affected eligibility.(29,30)”
BackgroundWalker, R., Huxley, L., Juttner, M., Burmeister, E. A., Scott, J., & Aitken, L. M. (2016) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/1054773816629689 · Cited by 21
“A permissible exception to this was the post-randomization exclusion of patients mistakenly recruited (Chan, Robioneck, & Joensson, 2008; Fergusson et al., 2002).”
BackgroundCollins, J. A. (2006) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.064 · Cited by 21
“The analysis was not by intention to treat ecause it ignored the 27 postrandomization exclusions (8).”
BackgroundDetailed statistical analysis plan for the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT)
Johnsen, A. T., Petersen, M. A., Gluud, C. N., Lindschou, J., Fayers, P. M., Sjøgren, P., Pedersen, L., Neergaard, M. A., Vejlgaard, T. B., Damkier, A., et al. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-376 · Cited by 20
Machulska, A., Eiler, T. J., Grünewald, A., Brück, R., Jahn, K., Niehaves, B., Ullrich, H., & Klucken, T. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-4098-5 · Cited by 20
Comparison between clinical trials and real-world evidence studies on biologics for severe asthma
Menzella, F., Ballarin, A., Sartor, M., Floriani, A. F., Corsi, L., Dartora, C., Tonin, S., & Romagnoli, M. (2022) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/03000605221133689 · Cited by 22
“However, these studies were conducted under controlled conditions (established by strict patient selection criteria) not always applicable to real life.(3,4) For this and other reasons, real-world evidence (RWE) and pragmatic studies are required to provide useful information on the effectiveness of biological drugs a…”
BackgroundScorsetti, M., Navarria, P., Cozzi, L., Clerici, E., Bellu, L., Franceschini, D., Marzo, A. M., Franzese, C., Torri, V., Reggiori, G., et al. (2023) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-023-02216-5 · Cited by 21
“The impact of RN and local progression was estimated by competing risk analysis and cumulative incidence approach considering death as the competing event [27, 28].”
MethodStudy Looking at End Expiratory Pressure for Altitude Illness Decrease (SLEEP-AID)
Lipman, G. S., Kanaan, N. C., Phillips, C. T., Pomeranz, D., Cain, P., Fontes, K., Higbee, B., Meyer, C., Shaheen, M., Wentworth, S., et al. (2015) · High Altitude Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1089/ham.2014.1110 · Cited by 20
“We performed a modified intention-to-treat approach, where all randomly assigned study participants were analyzed except those not fulfilling inclusion criteria and those who never received the intervention (Fergusson et al., 2002).”
Evidence-based nutrition support in the intensive care unit: an update on reported trial quality
Doig, G. S., Simpson, F. O., & Sweetman, E. A. (2009) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32832182b0 · Cited by 20
Palomba, S., Fornaciari, E., Falbo, A. I., & Sala, G. B. L. (2015) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.013 · Cited by 20
On differences between explanatory and pragmatic clinical trials
Alford, L. (2007) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 20
Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in parenting research: the issue of intention to treat
Whittaker, K. A., Sutton, C., & Burton, C. (2006) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2005.044214 · Cited by 20
Bias and Loss to Follow‐Up in Cardiovascular Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review
Fong, L. C. W., Ford, T. J., da Costa, B. R., Jüni, P., & Berry, C. (2020) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.119.015361 · Cited by 19
Aide, N., Fauchille, P., Coquan, E., Ferron, G., Combe, P., Meunier, J., Alexandre, J., Berton, D., Leary, A. F., Rauglaudre, G. D., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-05092-3 · Cited by 19
Rehman, A. M., Ferrand, R. A., Allen, E., Simms, V. M., McHugh, G., & Weiss, H. A. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039546 · Cited by 19
Estimation of Transition Probabilities for State-Transition Models: A Review of NICE Appraisals
Srivastava, T., Latimer, N. R., & Tappenden, P. (2021) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01034-5 · Cited by 19
“In typical three-state cancer models, defined in terms of progression-free, progressed disease and dead, TP estimates for the transition from progressed disease to dead may be subject to postrandomisation bias [12].”
BackgroundGoedendorp, M. M., Gielissen, M. F. M., Peters, M. E. W. J., Verhagen, C. A. H. H. V. M., & Bleijenberg, G. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1981 · Cited by 18
“When ineligible patients are randomised mistakenly into a trial, their data can be excluded post‐randomisation without risking bias [30].”
BackgroundRoss, L. F., Harvey, L. A., & Lannin, N. A. (2009) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215508101733 · Cited by 18
van Amstel, F. K. P., Peters, M. E. W. J., Donders, R., Schlooz-Vries, M. S., Polman, L. J. M., van der Graaf, W. T. A., Prins, J. B., & Ottevanger, P. B. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5324 · Cited by 20
“Four patients were erroneously enrolled and therefore excluded after randomization.(33) Overall, 96 BC patients were assigned to NDTI and 98 to UC.”
Yusri, S., Elfana, A., Elbattawy, W. A., & El‐Sayed, K. M. F. (2021) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04056-7 · Cited by 19
“Data of interest were study design, number of defects/ participants in each arm, study setting, the treated periodontal condition, type of interventions, type, form, and concentration of antibiotics used, follow-up intervals, reported systemic antibiotic embargo period, in addition to the pre-defined primary and secon…”
BackgroundHansen, T. K., Pedersen, L. H., Shahla, S., Damsgaard, E. M. S., Bruun, J. M., & Gregersen, M. (2021) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104511 · Cited by 19
The Role of Data and Safety Monitoring in Acute Trauma Resuscitation Research
Champion, H. R., Fingerhut, A. L., Escobar, M. A., & Weiskopf, R. B. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.10.024 · Cited by 19
Carroll, C., Scope, A., & Kaltenthaler, E. (2013) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-6-539 · Cited by 18
“[13] If these are included, then explicit best and worst case analyses perhaps should have been performed, with imputations explained [14]”
BackgroundEffects of Variety Support on Exercise‐Related Well‐Being
Sylvester, B. D., Lubans, D. R., Eather, N., Standage, M., Wolf, S. A., McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Kaulius, M., Crocker, P. R. E., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2016) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12069 · Cited by 32
“Since our aim in conducting an ITT analysis was to pragmatically evaluate the effects of receiving variety support, consistent with Fergusson et al. (2002) it was not appropriate to include participants who did not receive any of the intervention (i.e. did not attend at least one exercise session;…”
MethodJanse, A., Wiborg, J. F., Bleijenberg, G., Tummers, M., & Knoop, H. (2016) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000085 · Cited by 18
Hildebrand, A. S., Roesmann, K., Planert, J., Machulska, A., Otto, E., & Klucken, T. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06320-x · Cited by 22
“Multiple imputations of missing data will be performed for intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses [37].”
MethodA comparison of imputation strategies in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes
Caille, A., Leyrat, C., & Giraudeau, B. (2014) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280214530030 · Cited by 18
Veterinary oncology clinical trials: Design and implementation
Thamm, D. H., & Vail, D. M. (2014) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.013 · Cited by 18
van Hamersveld, K. T., de Mheen, P. J. M., Nelissen, R. G. H. H., & Toksvig‐Larsen, S. (2018) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.1080/17453674.2018.1469223 · Cited by 18
Samimi, M., Gouge, A. L., Boralévi, F., Passeron, T., Pascal, F., Bernard, P., Agbo-Godeau, S., Leducq, S., Fricain, J., Vaillant, L., et al. (2020) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.16324 · Cited by 18
Fortin, S., Kalsekar, I. D., Johnston, S. S., & Akıncıgil, A. (2020) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.012 · Cited by 18
Blum, C. A., Nigro, N., Winzeler, B. F., Suter‐Widmer, I., Schüetz, P., Briel, M., Bingisser, R. M., Zimmerli, W., Ullmer, E., Elsaesser, H., et al. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-257 · Cited by 18
“Following the intention-to-treat principle, all patients receiving at least one dose of study medication will be included in the analysis with group allocation as randomized; patients violating inclusion criteria or meeting exclusion criteria due to information that was not available at study entry will be excluded po…”
MethodJensen, C. S., Aagaard, H., Olesen, H. V., & Kirkegaard, H. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2011-7 · Cited by 22
Which patients to include in the analysis?
Kunz, R., & Guyatt, G. H. (2006) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00854.x · Cited by 18
Self-citationWound cleansing for pressure ulcers
Moore, Z. E. H., & Cowman, S. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004983.pub2 · Cited by 18
Sørensen, S. S., Pedersen, K. M., Weinreich, U. M., & Ehlers, L. H. (2016) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0298-2 · Cited by 17
Moskowitz, A. L., Yankama, T. T., Andersen, L. W., Huang, D. T., Donnino, M. W., & Grossestreuer, A. V. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034406 · Cited by 17
Treatment of current depressive symptoms in dialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Nadort, E., Schouten, R. W., Witte, S. H. S., Broekman, B. F. P., Honig, A., Siegert, C. E. H., & van Oppen, P. (2020) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.07.012 · Cited by 17
Zeibig, J., Seiffer, B., Frei, A. K., Takano, K., Sudeck, G., Rösel, I., Hautzinger, M., & Wolf, S. (2022) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102340 · Cited by 18
Basit, G., Sü, S., Geçkil, E., Basit, O., & Alabay, K. N. K. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103634 · Cited by 20
McManus, F. V., Muse, K., Surawy, C., Hackmann, A., & Williams, J. M. G. (2014) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0318-y · Cited by 17
“Intentionto-treat (Fergusson et al. 2002) analyses are reported throughout with post-treatment data carried forward for the two participants who did not attend the follow-up appointment.”
MethodPresneill, J., Little, L., Nichol, A., French, C., Cooper, D. J., Haddad, S. H., Duranteau, J., Huet, O., Skrifvars, M. B., Arabi, Y. M., et al. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-501 · Cited by 17
“based on all randomly assigned patients except those withdrawing consent for use of all trial data and those not fulfilling inclusion criteria and never receiving the intervention [12].”
Studying Surgical Innovations: Challenges of the Randomized Controlled Trial
Unger, C. A., & Barber, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.02.012 · Cited by 17
Sturm, D. J., Bachner, J., Renninger, D., Haug, S., & Demetriou, Y. (2021) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101902 · Cited by 25
Andersen‐Ranberg, N. C., Poulsen, L. M., Perner, A., Wetterslev, J., Estrup, S., Lange, T., Ebdrup, B. H., Hästbacka, J., Morgan, M. P. G., Citerio, G., et al. (2019) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aas.13453 · Cited by 17
Rønsbo, T. N., Laigaard, J., Pedersen, C., Mathiesen, O., & Karlsen, A. P. H. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05233-5 · Cited by 16
“This minimises the influence of withdrawals and patients lost to follow-up and likely prevents type 1 errors [31].”
BackgroundSystematic Review of the “Pragmatism” of Pragmatic Critical Care Trials
Palakshappa, J. A., Gibbs, K. W., Lannan, M. T., Cranford, A., & Taylor, S. P. (2022) · Critical Care Explorations · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000738 · Cited by 16
“org 5 gold standard for assessing superiority of an intervention (20, 21).”
BackgroundBeyond Randomized Controlled Trials in Attempted Suicide Research
Hatcher, S., Sharon, C., & Coggan, C. (2009) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2009.39.4.396 · Cited by 16
Alsaleh, K. (2013) · Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jnci.2013.03.001 · Cited by 15
Controversial role of arthroscopic meniscectomy of the knee: A review
Ha, A. Y., Shalvoy, R. M., Voisinet, A., Racine, J., & Aaron, R. K. (2016) · World Journal of Orthopedics · doi:10.5312/wjo.v7.i5.287 · Cited by 15
Schaffer, J. T., Hess, E. P., Hollander, J. E., Kline, J. A., Torres, C. A., Diercks, D. B., Jones, R., Owen, K. P., Meisel, Z. F., Demers, M., et al. (2017) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.13355 · Cited by 15
“Patients deemed to meet exclusion criteria after randomization, but before the patient–clinician disposition discussion, were classified as postrandomization exclusions.(10)”
MethodEffects of Self-Monitoring Training Logs on Behaviors and Beliefs of Swimmers
Young, B. W., Medic, N., & Starkes, J. L. (2009) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200903222889 · Cited by 15
“Of the original 31 participants, four swimmers dropped out of the intervention due to insufficient log completion, resulting in an acceptable voluntary attrition rate of 13% ( Fergusson, Aaron, Guyatt, & Hebert, 2002 ).”
BackgroundReporting Methodological Items in Randomized Experiments in Political Science
Boutron, I., John, P., & Torgerson, D. (2010) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716209351518 · Cited by 15
“The recommended strategy is an ITT analysis, an investigation of results of RCTs that compares all participants in the groups to which they were originally randomly assigned (Fergusson et al. 2002; Hollis and Campbell 1999; Schulz et al. 1996).”
MethodKnowlden, A. P., & Sharma, M. (2014) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839914523431 · Cited by 15
Managing the baby with a patent ductus arteriosus. More questions than answers?
Fowlie, P. W. (2005) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · doi:10.1136/adc.2004.065946 · Cited by 15
INCEPT : The Intensive Care Platform Trial—Design and protocol
Granholm, A., Møller, M. H., Kaas‐Hansen, B. S., Jensen, A. K. G., Munch, M. W., Kjær, M. N., Andersen, L. W., Schjørring, O. L., Rasmussen, B. S., Meyhoff, T. S., et al. (2025) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aas.70023 · Cited by 13
“52 Additional analyses may be conducted using other analysis sets (e.g., per-protocol populations).”
Kowalkowski, M. A., Eaton, T. A., McWilliams, A. D., Tapp, H., Rios, A., Murphy, S., Burns, R., Gutnik, B., O’Hare, K., McCurdy, L., et al. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06521-1 · Cited by 14
Wharton, J. M., Piccini, J. P., Koren, A., Huse, S., & Ronk, C. J. (2022) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.120.020506 · Cited by 14
“…the balance between the dronedarone and sotalol groups created by the propensity-score– matching process (minimizing type I error and increasing generalizability) but restricted the ability to evaluate patients while solely on their assigned treatment (potentially elevating type II error 38 ).”
Machulska, A., Rinck, M., Klucken, T., Kleinke, K., Wunder, J.-C., Remeniuk, O., & Margraf, J. (2022) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-021-06058-5 · Cited by 15
“Missing values were replaced through multiple imputations and the intention-to-treat (ITT) principles (Fergusson et al. 2002).”
Methodvan Haren, F. M. P., Laffey, J. G., Artigas, A., Page, C. P., Schultz, M. J., Cosgrave, D. W., McNicholas, B., Smoot, T. L., Nunes, Q. M., Richardson, A., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.15253 · Cited by 13
“data already collected is allowed, including the primary outcome, and will exclude patients who do not fulfil the study entry criteria.(34) Missing data will not be imputed.”
BackgroundReade, M. C., Marks, D. C., Howe, B. D., McGuinness, S., Parke, R. L., Navarra, L., Charlewood, R., Johnson, L., & McQuilten, Z. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068933 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Fergusson, D., Aaron, S. D., Guyatt, G., & Hébert, P.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fergusson, Dean
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-09-21
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 7365
- Pages
- 652-654
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC1124168
- OpenAlex
- W2000522086
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 17.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- intention-to-treat analysis, randomized controlled trials, random error, statistical analysis of clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review