The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: Combining direct and indirect evidence.
Open accessAbstract
A randomized comparison between rasburicase and allopurinol in children with lymphoma or
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“network meta-analysis offers a methodological solution to provide more precise pooled head-to-head effect estimates than may otherwise be achieved 19, 20 .”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Self-citationCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
Self-citationKeeley, E. C., Boura, J., & Grines, C. L. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12113-7 · Cited by 4,339
Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines
Woolf, S. H., Grol, R. P. T. M., Hutchinson, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527 · Cited by 2,549
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons
Lu, G., & Ades, A. E. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1875 · Cited by 2,172
Self-citationBucher, H. C., Guyatt, G. H., Griffith, L. E., & Walter, S. D. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00049-8 · Cited by 2,052
Interferon beta‐1b is effective in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis
Paty, D. W., Li, D. K. B., the UBC MS/MRI Study Group, & the IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.4.662 · Cited by 1,964
Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews
Mulrow, C. D. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597 · Cited by 1,677
Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons
Lumley, T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1201 · Cited by 1,206
Health Outcomes Associated With Various Antihypertensive Therapies Used as First-Line Agents
Psaty, B. M., Lumley, T., Furberg, C. D., Lovasi, G. S., Pahor, M., Alderman, M. H., & Weiss, N. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2534 · Cited by 1,096
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams K. An introduction to Baye- sian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ 1999;319:508-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,003
Winder, C. B., Sargeant, J. M., Hu, D., Wang, C., Kelton, D. F., Godkin, M. A., Churchill, K. J., & O'Connor, A. M. C. (2019) · Animal Health Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1466252319000318 · Cited by 16
Mixture models for overdispersed data
Rhodes, J. R. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0013 · Cited by 15
Cognitive behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
Churchill, R. C., Moore, T. H., Caldwell, D. M., Davies, P. A., Jones, H., Furukawa, T. A., Lewis, G., & Hunot, V. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008698 · Cited by 15
Self-citationRetractedChen, L., Guan, B., Anderson, D., Ferreira, P. H., Stanford, R., Beckenkamp, P. R., van Gelder, J. M., Bayartai, M.-E., Radojčić, M. R., Fairbank, J. C. T., et al. (2024) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03653-z · Cited by 14
“An NMA can also provide a relative ranking of competing interventions, thus, the superiority of different interventions for a given outcome [9].”
BackgroundCao, Z., Zhou, J., Long, Z., Li, Y., Sun, J., Luo, Y., & Wang, W. (2020) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.202232 · Cited by 15
Zhao, X., Huang, X., Cai, Y., Cao, T., & Wan, Q. (2022) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2022.2026879 · Cited by 14
“baseline data of patients, trial design) among trails (Caldwell et al., 2005; Jansen & Naci, 2013).”
BackgroundLi, Y., Lei, R., Lei, H., Qin, X., Xie, F., Yao, C., & Feng, P. (2022) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000002471 · Cited by 15
Yamada, Y., Kitamura, M., Inayama, E., Kishida, M., Kataoka, Y., & Ikenoue, T. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077343 · Cited by 14
“17 Herein, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess whether acoustic stimulations relieve venipuncture pain and which type of acoustic stimulation is the most effective (online supplemental figure 1 shows a conceptual diagram of the research questions).”
MethodHuang, C.-Y., Zhao, Y.-F., Zhang, Z., Liu, R.-B., Liu, J.-L., Li, X., Luo, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2024.2381696 · Cited by 17
“…gamma-aminobutyric acid (GaBa) at the GaBa a receptor. in most cases, it is administered to treat disabling anxiety and insomnia [60,61]. according to this unique algorithm, NMa allows the synthesis of data from a network of Rcts and boosts the simultaneous comparison of many interventions [19,62].”
Plosker, G. L. (2012) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/11208500-000000000-00000 · Cited by 14
Shim, S. R., Kim, J. H., Chang, I. H., Shin, I., Hwang, S. D., Kim, K. H., Yoon, S. J., & Song, Y. S. (2016) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407 · Cited by 14
“Indirect evidence should be cautiously applied in practice as it is usually considered less reliable than direct evidence.(41,42) In the present study, however, two sets of controlled trials were sufficiently similar in terms of moderators of relative treatment effect, which enabled scientific indirect analysis with m…”
Network meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale management strategies in cryptogenic stroke
Saber, H., Palla, M., Kazemlou, S., Azarpazhooh, M. R., Seraji‐Bozorgzad, N., & Behrouz, R. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005736 · Cited by 14
“We performed NMA using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo model.(13) Hierarchical Bayesian network combines all available treatment comparisons and ranks the treatment based on comparative effectiveness, thus increasing power and precision.”
MethodPharmacological treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a network meta-analysis
Wang, L., Yin, L. W., Li, K.-X., & Xu, G. (2019) · Gastroenterology report · doi:10.1093/gastro/goz043 · Cited by 14
MacDonald, L., Zanjir, M., Lighvan, N. L., da Costa, B. R., Suri, S., & Azarpazhooh, A. (2020) · Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1111/ocr.12409 · Cited by 15
Wei, L., Meng, J., Qi, J., Lü, Y., & Zhu, X. (2020) · Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000562 · Cited by 14
“The Markov chain Monte Carlo method was used to obtain the pooled effect sizes, and 4 chains were calculated.(32) Each chain comprised 50 000 simulation iterations, a tuning number of 20 000, a thinning interval of 10, an initial value scaling of 2.”
MethodHuang, P., Li, Z., Chen, L., Zeng, J., Zhao, S., Tang, Y., Huang, B., Guan, H., Chen, Y., Feng, Y., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.918689 · Cited by 13
“As an extension of conventional pairwise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis enables the comparison between two or more interventions by integrating a direct comparison between various interventions, as well as an indirect comparison and further implementation ranking among the interventions (Caldwell et al., 2005; L…”
MethodEvidence-Based Programs in “Real World” Settings: Finding the Best Fit
Powell, B. J., Bosk, E. A., Wilen, J. S., Danko, C. M., Scoyoc, A. V., & Banman, A. (2015) · Child maltreatment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16327-7_7 · Cited by 15
Howren, M. B., Weg, M. W. V., & Wolinsky, F. D. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer.14.6 · Cited by 16
Li, J., Chen, Z., Gao, X., Zhang, H., Xiong, W., Ju, J., & Xu, H. (2017) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.036 · Cited by 14
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain
Rihn, J. A., Radcliff, K. E., Norvell, D. C., Eastlack, R. K., Phillips, F. M., Berland, D., Sherry, N., Freedman, M. K., & Vaccaro, A. R. (2017) · Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication · doi:10.1097/bsd.0000000000000410 · Cited by 14
Wu, D., Chen, T., Jiang, H., Duan, C., Zhang, X., Lin, Y., Chen, S., & Wu, F. (2019) · Journal of Oncology · doi:10.1155/2019/3406972 · Cited by 14
“To incorporate indirect with direct comparisons, we performed random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in WinBUGS software version 1.4.3 (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK) [16, 32].”
BackgroundInfluentialChen, H., Horita, N., Ito, K., Nagakura, H., Hara, Y., Kobayashi, N., Yamamoto, M., Kudo, M., & Kaneko, T. (2020) · Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology · doi:10.1177/1758835920965841 · Cited by 14
The Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Mavranezouli, I., Meader, N., Cape, J. D., & Kendall, T. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0031-z · Cited by 16
“was synthesized using network meta-analytic techniques, which enable evidence synthesis from both direct and indirect comparisons between drugs, and allow simultaneous inference on all drugs examined in trial pair-wise comparisons while preserving randomization [20, 21].”
Methodvan Valkenhoef, G., & Ades, A. E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.012 · Cited by 14
“[5] Caldwell DM, Ades AE.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationHersi, M., Corace, K., Hamel, C., Esmaeilisaraji, L., Rice, D., Dryburgh, N., Skidmore, B., Garber, G., Porath, A., Willows, M., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292745 · Cited by 13
“Assessments of the comparative benefits and harms of different treatments for MUD/PMU using evidence synthesis techniques such as network meta-analysis (NMA) may also provide new insights.”
InfluentialSkapinakis, P., Caldwell, D. M., Hollingworth, W., Bryden, P. A., Fineberg, N. A., Salkovskis, P. M., Welton, N. J., Baxter, H., Kessler, D. S., Churchill, R. C., et al. (2021) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.19402 · Cited by 15
Self-citationTan, L. W., Ng, Y. E., Giok, K. C., Veettil, S. K., & Menon, R. K. (2023) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12030512 · Cited by 13
“A random-effects network meta-analysis (frequentist approach) using either a consistency or an inconsistency model was applied to synthesize the available evidence by combining direct and indirect evidence from different studies [42,43].”
MethodZhang, M., Liang, Z., Li, Y., Meng, J., Jiang, X., Xu, B.-C., Li, H., & Liu, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1234017 · Cited by 17
“To assess this hypothesis, we examined the distribution of possible effect modifiers by comparing intervention methods for further analyses, including baseline characteristics of participants, intervention duration, and intervention frequency (23, 31, 32).”
MethodMiura, T., Yamamoto, N., Shiroshita, A., Tsuge, T., Saitsu, A., Yoshitani, J., Nakao, S., & Takami, K. (2024) · JBJS Reviews · doi:10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00120 · Cited by 13
Xu, Y., Liu, R., Huang, L., Qin, Y., Liu, W., Huang, S., & Zhang, J. (2024) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae877 · Cited by 13
Indirect Comparison Between Subcutaneous Biologic Agents in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Migliore, A., Bizzi, E., Bernardi, M., Diamanti, A. P., Laganà, B., & Petrella, L. (2014) · Clinical Drug Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40261-014-0246-6 · Cited by 13
“Mixed treatment comparison, with respect to common meta-analysis, enables the estimation of data by assembling and analysing data extracted from several studies on the same subject [15–18].”
BackgroundMethodYoudom, S. W., Samson, A., Basco, L. K., & Thalabard, J. (2012) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-147 · Cited by 13
“These direct and indirect evidences are usually estimated using Bayesian methods [10,14,15].”
MethodTerasawa, T., Trikalinos, N. A., Djulbegović, B., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2012) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.05.007 · Cited by 13
“) With MTM we combined the totality of direct and indirect evidence in a single analysis.(13,14,25) The main MTM analyses assumed consistency between treatments.”
MethodTierney, J. F., Vale, C. L., Parelukar, W. R., Rydzewska, L. H. M., & Halabi, S. (2019) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.005 · Cited by 12
“In this scenario, network meta-analysis can be used to make optimal use of both the direct and indirect comparisons of treatments from all trials, and to allow the relative effects of all treatments to be ranked(19, 20).”
MethodLorenzi, M. F., Arndorfer, S., Aguiar‐Ibáñez, R., Scherrer, E., Liu, F. X., & Krepler, C. (2019) · Journal of Drug Assessment · doi:10.1080/21556660.2019.1649266 · Cited by 13
Network meta‐analysis of first‐line treatments in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma patients
Gil‐Sierra, M. D., Gimeno‐Ballester, V., Fenix-Caballero, S., & Rey, E. J. A. D. (2020) · European Journal Of Haematology · doi:10.1111/ejh.13407 · Cited by 13
Ouyang, R., Li, Z., Huang, S., Liu, J., & Huang, J. (2020) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa152 · Cited by 13
Immuno-oncology therapy in metastatic bladder cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Chierigo, F., Wenzel, M., Würnschimmel, C., Flammia, R. S., Horlemann, B., Tian, Z., Fred Saad, C., Chun, F. K. ‐., Tilki, D., Shariat, S. F., et al. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103534 · Cited by 13
Bian, Z., Yu, J., Tu, M., Liao, B., Huang, J., Izumoji, G., Sun, R., Xu, Y., Jiang, Y., He, X., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056632 · Cited by 13
Che, Z., Green, N., & Baio, G. (2022) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x221134545 · Cited by 13
“45 The mechanism of separately estimating observed and external hazards achieves flexibility in a simple way, and obtaining the blending result is not complex given a weight function identified by the experts.”
BackgroundEgan, C. G., Migliore, A., Bizzi, E., Bernardi, M., & Petrella, L. (2015) · Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management · doi:10.2147/tcrm.s89678 · Cited by 13
“This method preserves within-trial randomization and enables all available direct and indirect comparisons between treatments to be made in one analysis.(40) Results of all trials were analyzed simultaneously by a fixed-effect model.”
Panagiotopoulou, N., Shankaralingaiah, N., Karavolos, S., Ahmad, G., Karabis, A., & Burls, A. (2014) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.12441 · Cited by 12
Edwards, S. J., Clarke, M. J., Wordsworth, S., & Welton, N. J. (2008) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007990802633160 · Cited by 13
Owen, A. (2010) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.11.045 · Cited by 13
“Meta analysis of trials of Aspirin ( A Bayesian network random effects meta analysis [21] of the data used in the above pair wise comparisons was undertaken using WinBUGS [22].”
MethodBae, S., & Lee, Y. H. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-017-0292-6 · Cited by 13
“Thus, the network meta-analysis method improves statistical power and precision by assessing the comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions and combining evidence across a network of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), even in the absence of head-to-head comparisons [4].”
MethodSong, G. G., & Lee, Y. H. (2019) · Clinical Drug Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40261-019-00765-w · Cited by 13
“To obtain the relative efficacy and safety of drugs, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis that compared the relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and apremilast in patients with active PsA, which enabled an indirect comparison of multiple treatments from studies that either lacked or contained insuffici…”
MethodLei, H., Fu, Y., Xu, G., Yin, Z., Zhao, L., & Liang, F. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000018558 · Cited by 13
“This protocol is designed for systematic review and network meta-analysis, which will overcome the constraints by creating indirect contrasts and implementing data composing([22,23]) provide evidence to guide the best practice in acupuncture and moxibustion treatments of neurogenic bladder due to SCI.”
Ismaila, A., Haeussler, K., Czira, A., Tongbram, V., Malmenäs, M., Agarwal, J., Nassim, M., Gojovic, M. Z., Shen, Y., Dong, X., et al. (2022) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-022-02234-x · Cited by 13
Brunetti, M., Ruiz, F. J., Lord, J. L., Pregno, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444320398.ch10 · Cited by 13
Zhao, X., Meng, L., Liu, S., & Chen, Y. (2021) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.14756 · Cited by 12
Lee, Y. H., & Song, G. G. (2022) · Pharmacology · doi:10.1159/000525066 · Cited by 12
Zhao, B., Wu, J., Xia, Y., Li, H., Wang, Y., Qu, T., Xing, H., Wang, Y., & Ma, W. (2022) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106316 · Cited by 12
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, J., Wu, G.-H., & Shi, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1032253 · Cited by 13
Muñoz‐Pardeza, J., López‐Gil, J. F., Huerta‐Uribe, N., Hormazábal‐Aguayo, I., Izquierdo, M., & García‐Hermoso, A. (2024) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-024-02301-3 · Cited by 12
“In the NMA, indirect evidence is added to direct evidence for gaining precision purposes [38].”
BackgroundSystematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis
Zhu, G., You, J., Shi, K., He, S., Wang, L., Chen, Y., Braddock, M., & Zheng, M. (2015) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000000379 · Cited by 12
Influence of incision on periodontal parameters after apical surgery: a meta-analysis
Castro-Calderón, A., Toledano‐Serrabona, J., Sánchez‐Torres, A., Camps‐Font, O., Sánchez‐Garcés, M. Á., & Gay‐Escoda, C. (2021) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03761-z · Cited by 12
Niu, Z., Guo, S., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Guo, X., Grossi, F., Ichiki, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-21-1423 · Cited by 11
“When a certain type of disease has multiple treatment plans, NMA combined with the evidence of direct comparison and indirect comparison can be used to compare multiple interventions at the same time (32).”
Zhang, X., Li, X., Xiong, Y., Wang, Y., Wei, J., Zeng, C., Sha, T., & Lei, G. (2021) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24750 · Cited by 12
“This method can increase the number of studies within each comparison, thereby narrowing the width of the confidence interval (CI) of the estimate (32,33).”
MethodLee, J. H., Lee, H., Lee, S. W., Hwang, S. D., & Song, J. H. (2021) · Transplantation Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.05.006 · Cited by 12
Guo, Q., Lv, Z., Wang, H., Song, L., Liu, Y., Chen, H., & Zhou, C.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.013 · Cited by 12
Sotiropoulos, J. X., Oei, J. L., Schmölzer, G. M., Hunter, K. E., Williams, J. G., Webster, A. C., Vento, M., Kapadia, V., Rabi, Y., Dekker, J., et al. (2022) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000525127 · Cited by 12
Dias, S., Sutton, A. J., Welton, N. J., & Ades, A. E. (2011) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 12
Self-citationErnest, P. J. G., Viechtbauer, W., Schouten, J., Beckers, H. J. M., Hendrikse, F., Prins, M. H., & Webers, C. A. B. (2010) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01995.x · Cited by 12
“These studies were excluded, because including them would result in selection bias (Caldwell et al. 2005).”
BackgroundStudy design and patient characteristics and outcome in acute mania clinical trials
Tarr, G. P., Herbison, P., de la Barra, S. L., & Glue, P. (2011) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00904.x · Cited by 12
Guyot, P., Pandhi, S., Nixon, R. M., Iqbal, A., Chaves, R. L., & Moore, A. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.03.006 · Cited by 13
Schmidt, E., Lister, J., Neumann, M., Więcek, W., Fu, S., Vataire, A. L., Sostar, J., Huang, S., & Marteau, F. (2018) · Targeted Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11523-018-0559-0 · Cited by 12
“, comparing the logarithm of the HRs [15]) [48].”
BackgroundMethodLu, F., Hu, E.-D., Xu, L., Hu, Y., Lu, C., Wu, J., Li, H., Chen, D., & Chen, Y. (2018) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2018.6063 · Cited by 12
“These eight treatments were compared from six RCTs by network meta-analysis (NMA), which calculates the relative effects for all treatments, including treatments that have not been compared one by one, in the evidence network in one simultaneous analysis (18).”
Athanasiou, A., Veroniki, A. A., Efthimiou, O., Kalliala, I. E. J., Naci, H., Bowden, S. J., Paraskevaidi, M., Martin‐Hirsch, P. L., Bennett, P. R., Paraskevaidis, E. A., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028009 · Cited by 12
Al-Zoobaee, F. W. A., Loo, Y. S., Veettil, S. K., Gopinath, D., Maharajan, M. K., & Menon, R. K. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17238891 · Cited by 12
Yang, B., Shi, J., Chen, X., Ma, B., & Sun, H. X. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088440 · Cited by 12
“Network meta-analysis is a relatively new technique that can be used to indirectly compare the risk or benefit associated with randomly allocated treatments that have not been directly tested against each other [14].”
MethodWhat you don’t know can hurt you
Fox, G. A. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0006 · Cited by 12
Mavranezouli, I., & Lokkerbol, J. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0473-1 · Cited by 13
“NMA is the simultaneous comparison of multiple competing treatments in a single statistical model [70].”
BackgroundBae, S., & Lee, Y. H. (2018) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.13305 · Cited by 12
Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression
Churchill, R., Caldwell, D., Moore, T. H., Davies, P., Jones, H., Lewis, G., & Hunot, V. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008696 · Cited by 11
Self-citationA leave-one-out algorithm for contribution analysis in component network meta-analysis
Mao, Y., Shen, Y., Yang, Q., Shi, Q., & Li, S. (2025) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w · Cited by 13
“It enables simultaneous comparisons of three or more interventions for a medical condition through the integration of both direct evidence from clinical trials and indirect evidence from connected treat-ment networks [3, 4].”
A new approach to evaluating loop inconsistency in network meta‐analysis
Turner, R., Band, T., Morris, T. P., Fisher, D. J., Higgins, J. P. T., Carpenter, J. R., & White, I. R. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9872 · Cited by 10
Self-citationAl-Moraissi, E., Al-Maweri, A. A., Al-Tairi, N., Alkhutari, A. S., Grillo, R., & Christidis, N. (2023) · International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2023.09.006 · Cited by 8
Manara, M., Aiolfi, A., Bonitta, G., Schlanger, D., Popa, C., Lombardo, F., Manfredini, L., Biondi, A., Bonavina, L., & Bona, D. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16193404 · Cited by 11
“Therefore, a comprehensive network analysis focusing on TG and simultaneously comparing all surgical approaches for TG is lacking [11,12].”
BackgroundDoes Classification of Composites for Network Meta-analyses Lead to Erroneous Conclusions?
Schwendicke, F., Blunck, U., Tu, Y., & Göstemeyer, G. (2018) · Operative Dentistry · doi:10.2341/16-344-lit · Cited by 11
Onggo, J. R., Onggo, J. D., Phan, K. H., & Wilson, C. J. (2020) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.16078 · Cited by 11
Lee, Y. H., & Song, G. G. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-021-01119-8 · Cited by 11
Qiao, Y., Li, H., & Peng, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.745522 · Cited by 11
Lee, Y. H., & Song, G. G. (2022) · Pharmacology · doi:10.1159/000527223 · Cited by 24
Ioannidis, O., Chatzakis, C., Tirta, M., Anestiadou, Ε., Zapsalis, K., Symeonidis, S., Bitsianis, S., Kotidis, E. V., Pramateftakis, M. G., Mantzoros, I., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12124150 · Cited by 12
“Subsequently, a random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted to simultaneously compare the relative effectiveness of all interventions [19].”
MethodZafarí, Z., Thorlund, K., FitzGerald, J. M., Marra, C. A., & Sadatsafavi, M. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0179-1 · Cited by 9
“Network meta-analysis (NMA) is the extension of PMA that allows evidence synthesis from studies that each might have compared only a subset of treatments [6].”
Cognitive behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression
Hunot, V., Moore, T. H., Caldwell, D. M., Davies, P. A., Jones, H. G., Furukawa, T. A., Lewis, G., & Churchill, R. C. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008699 · Cited by 11
Self-citationRetractedImproving adherence in osteoporosis: a new management algorithm for the patient with osteoporosis
Baio, G., Barbagallo, M., D’Avola, G., Luccio, A. D., Tanna, G. L. D., Falaschi, P., Iolascon, G., Malavolta, N., Robbiati, F., & Ulivieri, F. M. (2011) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2011.537259 · Cited by 11
“Of note, Bayesian analyses provide a methodology for analyzing multiple treatments even when results of different head-to-head studies are conflicting [44,45].”
BackgroundSvedsäter, H., Stynes, G., Wex, J., Frith, L., Leather, D. A., Castelnuovo, E., Detry, M. A., & Berry, S. M. (2016) · Asthma Research and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40733-015-0016-0 · Cited by 11
“Although MTC are established as a useful tool for the synthesis of evidence that is suitable for use in clinical decision-making [27], to our knowledge, this is the first study to apply this methodology to data from clinical trials in asthma to investigate the relative efficacy of specific treatments.”
MethodWang, W., Liu, C., Zhou, W., Xia, T., Xie, H., & Wang, S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep25615 · Cited by 11
Statistical approaches to the problem of phylogenetically correlated data
Lajeunesse, M. J., & Fox, G. A. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0012 · Cited by 10
Yang, T., Liao, B., Chen, Y., Li, H., He, Q., Liu, Q., & Wang, K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14862-3 · Cited by 10
Lin, Y.-C., Chen, C., Liao, Y., Liao, A. H.-W., Lin, P., & Chang, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14917-5 · Cited by 12
Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures
Wang, H.-H., Shu, W.-B., Lan, G.-H., Zhang, X., Jiang, Z., De-hong, X., Bao, X.-X., & Li, A.-B. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24202 · Cited by 11
“Network meta-analysis(NMA) is the preferred methodology to compare multiple interventions because it can perform direct and indirect comparisons [10].”
MethodUthman, O. A., Al-Khudairy, L., Nduka, C. U., Court, R. A., Mistry, H., Meléndez‐Torres, G. J., Taylor‐Phillips, S., & Clarke, A. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01366-x · Cited by 11
“We will conduct network meta-analyses [25, 26] to compare effectiveness of the different types of interventions for primary prevention of CVD.”
MethodZhao, P., Song, X., Nie, L., Wang, Q., Zhang, P., Ding, Y., & Wang, Q. (2020) · Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101969 · Cited by 11
Sung, Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-020-00889-x · Cited by 11
The best approach for functional tricuspid regurgitation: A network meta‐analysis
Mauro, M. D., Lorusso, R., Parolari, A., Ravaux, J. M., Bonalumi, G., Guarracini, S., Ricci, F., Benedetto, U., & Calafiore, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Cardiac Surgery · doi:10.1111/jocs.15378 · Cited by 11
“Analyses were performed using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo modeling.(20) To provide a comparative hierarchy of procedural efficacy and safety, “Rankograms” with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities were reported.”
MethodSunderrajan, A., White, B., Durantini, M. R., Sánchez, F., Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2021) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0001088 · Cited by 11
Treatments for macular degeneration: summarising evidence using network meta-analysis
Fadda, V., Maratea, D., Trippoli, S., & Messori, A. (2011) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300316 · Cited by 11
“Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a tool that summarises the information on comparative effectiveness when three or more treatments are proposed for the same clinical indication.(3) 4 NMA includes both direct comparisons (based on real trials) and indirect comparisons (based on statistical testing in the absence of a rea…”
MethodFranconi, F., Omboni, S., Ambrosioni, E., Reggiardo, G., Campesi, I., & Borghi, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111558 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Caldwell, D. M., Ades, A. E., & Higgins, J. P. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Caldwell, Deborah M
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-10-13
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 7521
- Pages
- 897-900
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC1255806
- OpenAlex
- W1967385770
- Cited by
- 1,600
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 16.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Methemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome
- Keywords
- rasburicase, allopurinol, hyperuricemia, lymphoma, pediatric oncology, direct and indirect evidence, treatment comparison
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Making, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review