The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: Combining direct and indirect evidence.
Open accessAbstract
A randomized comparison between rasburicase and allopurinol in children with lymphoma or
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“network meta-analysis offers a methodological solution to provide more precise pooled head-to-head effect estimates than may otherwise be achieved 19, 20 .”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Self-citationCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Ben Van Den, A. (2020) · International Coaching Psychology Review · doi:10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.123 · Cited by 5,670
Self-citationKeeley, E. C., Boura, J., & Grines, C. L. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12113-7 · Cited by 4,339
Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines
Woolf, S. H., Grol, R. P. T. M., Hutchinson, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527 · Cited by 2,549
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons
Lu, G., & Ades, A. E. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1875 · Cited by 2,172
Self-citationBucher, H. C., Guyatt, G. H., Griffith, L. E., & Walter, S. D. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00049-8 · Cited by 2,052
Interferon beta‐1b is effective in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis
Paty, D. W., Li, D. K. B., the UBC MS/MRI Study Group, & the IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.4.662 · Cited by 1,964
Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews
Mulrow, C. D. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597 · Cited by 1,677
Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons
Lumley, T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1201 · Cited by 1,206
Health Outcomes Associated With Various Antihypertensive Therapies Used as First-Line Agents
Psaty, B. M., Lumley, T., Furberg, C. D., Lovasi, G. S., Pahor, M., Alderman, M. H., & Weiss, N. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2534 · Cited by 1,096
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams K. An introduction to Baye- sian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ 1999;319:508-12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,003
Deng, H., Cheng, X., Yang, Y., Fang, F., He, J., Tian, Y., Li, T., Xiao, Y., Feng, Y., Wang, P., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0285046 · Cited by 19
Frequency of Treatment-Effect Modification Affecting Indirect Comparisons
Coory, M. D., & Jordan, S. J. (2010) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/11535670-000000000-00000 · Cited by 19
Migliore, A., Broccoli, S., Massafra, U., Bizzi, E., & Frediani, B. (2012) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2012.659724 · Cited by 19
“Indeed, the observed 94% probability that teriparatide provides the greatest non-vertebral fracture risk reduction corresponds to a probability of only 6% of making the wrong decision in the case of prescribing teriparatide to a postmenopausal woman PTH (1-84) vs placebo”
BackgroundMethodCope, S. F., Capkun-Niggli, G., Gale, R., Lassen, C., Owen, R. J., Ouwens, M., Bergman, G., & Jansen, J. P. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.009 · Cited by 19
Linde, K., Schumann, I., Meißner, K., Jamil, S., Kriston, L., Rücker, G., Antes, G., & Schneider, A. (2011) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-127 · Cited by 19
“Network (or multiple/mixed treatment) meta-analyses are an enhancement of the traditional meta-analysis methodology to more than two interventions [24].”
BackgroundMoore, A., Derry, S., Wiffen, P. J., Banerjee, S., Karan, R., Glimm, E., Wiksten, A. S., Aldington, D. J., & Eccleston, C. (2018) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001322 · Cited by 19
“comparisons of interventions within randomized controlled trials (A vs B) and indirect comparisons across trials based on a common comparator such as placebo (A vs placebo and B vs placebo).(4,21,23,25,31,47) They use all available high-quality trials, producing a network of randomized clinical trials evaluated in an…”
MethodLiang, J., Li, J., Jia, R., Wang, Y., Wu, R.-K., Zhang, H., Hang, L., & Xu, Y. (2018) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s184968 · Cited by 19
“36 A Bayesian hierarchical random effects meta-analysis was performed for each treatment comparison, as we anticipate clinical and methodological between-study heterogeneity.”
Liang, J., Li, J., Jia, R., Ying-quan, W., Wu, R.-K., Zhang, H., Hang, L., Xu, Y., & Pan, C. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.017 · Cited by 20
Song, G. G., Choi, S. J., & Lee, Y. H. (2019) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.13616 · Cited by 19
Comparison of 3 Treatment Methods for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis
Lin, Z.-Q., Zhang, H., Luo, G.-G., Yao, J.-C., Xie, H., Zhang, X., & Zhu, Y.-Z. (2019) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.917311 · Cited by 20
“Compared to traditional meta-analysis, network meta-analysis can be used to compare multiple interventions, even without direct comparisons [20].”
MethodCao, Z., Li, Y., Wang, W., Jie, S., Hu, X., Zhou, J. H., Wu, T., Aili, D., Long, Z., Li, Y., et al. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/9013283 · Cited by 20
Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis
Wilson, A., Morton, V. H., Marson, E. J., Markland, A. D., Larkai, E., Papadopoulou, A., Coomarasamy, A., Tobı́as, A., Chou, D., Oladapo, O. T., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014978 · Cited by 19
Chen, H., Lu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhu, X., Zhou, J., & Chen, Y. (2018) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1892 · Cited by 19
Churchill, R. C., Moore, T. H., Davies, P., Caldwell, D. M., Jones, H., Lewis, G., & Hunot, V. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008705 · Cited by 18
Self-citationMessori, A., Fadda, V., Maratea, D., Trippoli, S., & Marinai, C. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit588 · Cited by 19
Rollins, B. M., Silva, M. A., Donovan, J. L., & Kanaan, A. O. (2014) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.033 · Cited by 18
Veroniki, A. A., Tsokani, S., White, I. R., Schwarzer, G., Rücker, G., Mavridis, D., Higgins, J. P. T., & Salanti, G. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01401-y · Cited by 18
Self-citationRicci, C., Serbassi, F., Alberici, L., Ingaldi, C., Gaetani, L., Raffele, E. D., Pironi, L., Sasdelli, A. S., Mosconi, C., Marco, M. D., et al. (2023) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.005 · Cited by 20
Lee, Y. H., & Song, G. G. (2017) · Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.4078/jrd.2017.24.4.211 · Cited by 18
“method to estimate the pooled effect sizes [13].”
MethodZhang, K., Arora, P., Sati, N., Béliveau, A., Troke, N., Veroniki, A. A., Rodrigues, M., Rios, P. D. L., Zarin, W., & Tricco, A. C. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.023 · Cited by 18
“Network meta-analysis (NMA) extends this approach by evaluating many pairwise comparisons across a variety of interventions [2,3].”
BackgroundFan, M., Liu, J., Zhao, B.-C., Wu, X., Li, X., & Gu, J. (2020) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2020.8564 · Cited by 18
Huang, X., Yuan, F., Chen, Y., Huang, Y., Yang, Z., Lin, L., & Yu, J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051608 · Cited by 18
The optimal dose of oral tranexamic acid in melasma: A network meta-analysis
Wang, W.-J., Wu, T., Tu, Y., Kuo, K., Tsai, C., & Chie, W. (2022) · Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology · doi:10.25259/ijdvl_530_2021 · Cited by 18
Gibbs, V. N., Geneen, L. J., Champaneria, R., Raval, P., Doree, C. J., Brunskill, S. J., Novak, A., Palmer, A. J. R., & Estcourt, L. J. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013499.pub2 · Cited by 17
Hubbard, S., Cooper, N. J., Kendrick, D., Young, B., Wynn, P. M., He, Z., Miller, P. D., Achana, F. A., & Sutton, A. J. (2014) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041135 · Cited by 18
Migliore, A., Bizzi, E., Broccoli, S., & Laganà, B. (2011) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-011-1790-6 · Cited by 18
“MTC, an extension of traditional meta-analysis, enables multiple pairwise comparisons across a range of different interventions [ 4 , 5]. The results from MTC provide an objective approach to the difficult choice of treatment when relevant data are unavailable.”
BackgroundKendall, B. E. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0008 · Cited by 18
Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta‐analysis
Noma, H., Tanaka, S., Matsui, S., Cipriani, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2016) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7187 · Cited by 18
“In evaluating the efficacy of a particular treatment of interest in comparison with a control treatment, one limitation of conventional meta-analysis is that its application is restricted to only studies with direct pairwise comparisons of these treatments [1].”
BackgroundPopat, S., Mellemgaard, A., Reck, M., Hastedt, C., & Griebsch, I. (2017) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2016-0493 · Cited by 18
Gibbs, V. N., Champaneria, R., Palmer, A. J. R., Doree, C. J., & Estcourt, L. J. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013295 · Cited by 18
“Caldwell 2005 Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.”
Chaiyasothi, T., Nathisuwan, S., Dilokthornsakul, P., Vathesatogkit, P., Thakkinstian, A., Reid, C. M., Wongcharoen, W., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00547 · Cited by 19
“This approach assumes “consistency” of treatment effects across all included trials—that is, the direct and indirect estimates are consistent (Lu and Ades, 2004; Caldwell et al., 2005).”
Bonovas, S., Nikolopoulos, G. K., Piovani, D., González‐Lorenzo, M., Pantavou, K. G., Lytras, T., Peyrin‐Biroulet, L., & Danese, S. (2019) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14051 · Cited by 19
“Therefore, we carried out a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating budesonide‐MMX and mesalamine in active UC, and assessed their comparative efficacy, tolerability and harm by means of network meta‐analysis, which allows the assessment of multiple treatments simultaneously by synthesizing…”
MethodHu, H., Feng, C., Jiang, Z., Wang, L., Shrestha, S., Su, X., Shu, Y., Ge, L., Lai, W., Hua, F., et al. (2019) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-019-1253-8 · Cited by 20
Wang, Y., Lei, G., Zeng, C., Wei, J., He, H., Li, X., Zhu, Z., Wang, H., Wu, Z., Wang, N., et al. (2020) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.023 · Cited by 18
Jia, S., Wang, Z., Han, R., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Qin, X., Zhao, M., Xiang, R., & Yang, J. (2020) · Acta Diabetologica · doi:10.1007/s00592-020-01542-4 · Cited by 17
“Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test and weighted-adjusted Egger’s test [19].”
MethodDhippayom, T., Wateemongkollert, A., Mueangfa, K., Im, H., Dilokthornsakul, P., & Devine, B. (2021) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.049 · Cited by 19
Comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatment for hepatitis B
Govan, L., Wu, O., Xin, Y., Hutchinson, S. J., & Hawkins, N. (2015) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000000376 · Cited by 18
Leung, H. W. C., Chan, A. L. F., & LIN, S.-J. (2014) · Molecular and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.3892/mco.2014.323 · Cited by 18
“Two methods of indirect meta‑analysis were used: the most frequently used method was the adjusted indirect comparisons using the random effects model as described by Bucher et al (15) and Caldwell et al (16) and the Bayesian method outlined by Lu and Ades (13).”
Naci, H., & O'connor, A. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.002 · Cited by 18
“NMA is a relatively new method that differs from PMA by incorporating data from both direct (from trials that include a specific pairwise comparison) and indirect (from a network of trials that do not include that comparison) sources of evidence [15].”
[GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness].
Rasch, A., Perleth, M., Langer, G., Meerpohl, J., Gartlehner, G., Kaminski-Hartenthaler, A., & Schunemann, H. (2012) · Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.10.019 · Cited by 664
Qi, H., Liu, Z., Cao, H., Sun, W., Peng, W., Liu, B., Dong, S., Xiang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2018) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpy027 · Cited by 18
Nishimura, M., Matsumoto, S., Ohara, Y., Minowa, K., Tsunematsu, R., Takimoto, K., Imai, K., Tsuzuki, Y., Ota, H., Nakajima, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.023 · Cited by 18
Oxman, A. D., Lombard, C. J., Treweek, S. P., Gagnier, J. J., Maclure, M., & Zwarenstein, M. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.014 · Cited by 18
“Once there is direct evidence for different subgroups, such as people with different degrees of stenosis or different surgical procedures, a subgroup analysis needs to be used to answer the question of differential effects, whether it is done based on within study comparisons, between study comparisons, or both [7].”
BackgroundLópez‐Moreno, M., López‐Gil, J. F., Bravo‐Sànchez, A., Bertotti, G., & Roldán‐Ruiz, A. (2025) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.09.001 · Cited by 17
Fan, M., Liu, J., Zhao, B.-C., Wu, X., Li, X., Gu, J., & Schlesinger, N. (2020) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-020-05272-4 · Cited by 17
Takumoto, Y., Sasahara, Y., Narimatsu, H., & Akazawa, M. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45515 · Cited by 17
Wang, Y., Yao, M., Wang, J., Liu, H., Zhang, X., Zhao, L., Hu, X., Guan, H., & Lyu, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.818537 · Cited by 18
Lee, Y. H. (2022) · Pharmacology · doi:10.1159/000525627 · Cited by 17
Deodhar, A. A., Machado, P., Mørup, M. F., Taieb, V., Willems, D., Orme, M. E., Pritchett, D., & Gensler, L. S. (2023) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kead598 · Cited by 17
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer
Haiderali, A., Huang, M., Pan, W., Akers, K. G., Maciel, D., & Frederickson, A. M. (2024) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2023-0301 · Cited by 16
Soon, Y. Y., Leong, C. N., Tey, J. C. S., Tham, I. W. K., & Lu, J. J. (2014) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12190 · Cited by 17
Dai, X., Wang, H., Jing, Z., & Fu, P. (2014) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2014.921608 · Cited by 18
Geometry of the Randomized Evidence for Treatments of Pulmonary Hypertension
Tonelli, A. R., Zein, J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2013) · Cardiovascular Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/1755-5922.12050 · Cited by 17
“When multiple treatments are available, there is growing interest in examining the totality of the randomized evidence using trial networks [4,5].”
BackgroundShim, S. R., Kim, J. H., Choi, H., Lee, W. J., Kim, H. J., Bae, M. Y., Hwang, S. D., Kim, K. H., Bae, J. H., & Yoon, S. J. (2014) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2014.980887 · Cited by 17
Fu, H., Qian, G.-L., & Jiang, Z.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Investigative Medicine · doi:10.1136/jim-2016-000163 · Cited by 17
The uptake of Bayesian methods in biomedical meta‐analyses: A scoping review (2005–2016)
Grant, R. (2018) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12326 · Cited by 17
Fukumoto, T., Fukumoto, R., Oka, M., & Horita, N. (2019) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.15796 · Cited by 17
Zheng, B., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Ge, L., Wei, M., Bi, L., Deng, X., Wang, Q., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.14872 · Cited by 17
Dai, W., Zhuang, Z., Ling, H., Yang, Y., & Hang, C. (2020) · Neurosurgical Review · doi:10.1007/s10143-020-01240-3 · Cited by 17
Yang, W., Huang, X., Wang, S., Wang, H., Huang, W., & Shao, Z. (2020) · Journal of Orthopaedic Translation · doi:10.1016/j.jot.2020.03.008 · Cited by 19
“The advantage of a network meta-analysis is that indirect evidence can be used to obtain certainty for all treatment comparisons, and the two interventions can be compared in a network meta-analysis even if there is no direct evidence to compare them [36].”
BackgroundGao, Y., Shi, S., Li, M., Luo, X., Liu, M., Yang, K., Zhang, J., Song, F., & Tian, J. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01591-0 · Cited by 17
Network meta-analysis of the treatment efficacy of different lasers for peri-implantitis
Hu, M., Zheng, G., Lin, H. R., Li, N., Zhao, P., & Jian-min, H. (2021) · Lasers in Medical Science · doi:10.1007/s10103-020-03101-3 · Cited by 17
Mavranezouli, I., Welton, N. J., Daly, C., Wilcock, J., Bromham, N., Berg, L., Xu, J., Wood, D. M., Ravenscroft, J., Dworzynski, K., et al. (2022) · Clinical and Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ced.15356 · Cited by 17
Jandhyala, R., & Fullarton, J. (2012) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000139 · Cited by 17
Lee, Y. H., & Song, G. G. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-016-0186-z · Cited by 17
“The Markov Chain Monte Carlo method was used to obtain the pooled effect sizes [11].”
BackgroundMethodYoo, S. H., Jeong, C. W., Kwak, C. H., Kim, H. H., Choo, M. S., & Ku, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8071059 · Cited by 17
“The selection of a fixed or random effects model for reported outcomes was based on model fit criteria (Deviance Information Criteria, DIC) penalizing greater model complexity [22].”
MethodMaking Sense of Dual HER2-Targeting in Early Breast Cancer?
Carey, L., & Barry, W. (2014) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dju259 · Cited by 17
Dakin, H., & Gray, A. M. (2018) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x18758018 · Cited by 16
Caro, P., Turner, W., Caldwell, D. M., & Macdonald, G. M. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013361.pub2 · Cited by 19
Self-citationSaramago, P., Cooper, N. J., Sutton, A. J., Hayes, M., Dunn, K., Manca, A., & Kendrick, D. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-459 · Cited by 16
“Mixed treatment comparisons (also known as network meta-analysis) [32-35] are an extension of standard (pairwise) meta-analysis that enable the simultaneous comparison of all evaluated interventions within a single coherent analysis.”
BackgroundScott, D. A., Woods, B. S., Thompson, J. C., Clark, J. F., Hawkins, N., Chambers, M. G., Celli, B. R., & Calverley, P. M. A. (2015) · BMC Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0138-4 · Cited by 16
“NMA was then used to allow all treatment options to be compared in a single analysis [11–13].”
MethodSong, G. G., Seo, Y. H., Kim, J., Choi, S. J., Ji, J. D., & Lee, Y. H. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-015-0023-9 · Cited by 16
“We used the Markov chain Monte Carlo method to obtain pooled effect sizes [17].”
MethodQin, Z., Xie, S., Mao, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Furukawa, T. A., Kwong, J. S. W., Tian, J., & Liu, Z. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017392 · Cited by 16
“We will apply network meta-analysis to integrate direct and indirect comparisons, 29 30 which could be used not only to strengthen inferences concerning the efficacy and acceptability of treatments but also to rank the efficacy and acceptability of antiepileptic drugs accordingly.”
MethodA Causal Inference Approach to Network Meta-Analysis
Schnitzer, M. E., Steele, R. J., Bally, M., & Shrier, I. (2016) · Journal of Causal Inference · doi:10.1515/jci-2016-0014 · Cited by 15
“…studies are rarely used to inform scientific or medical decision making (Slavin, 1995), multiple sources of evidence may be aggregated in order to offer more generalizable and precise comparisons between treatments (Lum-ley, 2004, Salanti et al., 2008, Caldwell et al., 2005, Lu and Ades, 2004).”
BackgroundOlsen, J. H. H., Öberg, S., Andresen, K., Klausen, T. W., & Rosenberg, J. (2019) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11308 · Cited by 16
Shi, F., Wu, S., Cai, W., & Zhao, Y.-M. (2020) · The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2020.03.021 · Cited by 16
Li, J., Liang, J., Li, J., Qian, S., Jia, R., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.023 · Cited by 17
Prognostic Benefit of New Drugs for HFrEF: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Pagnesi, M., Baldetti, L., Aimo, A., Inciardi, R. M., Tomasoni, D., Vizzardi, E., Vergaro, G., Emdin, M., & Lombardi, C. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11020348 · Cited by 16
“The present NMA included RCTs comparing the study drugs (SGLT2i, vericiguat, or omecamtiv mecarbil) with the placebo on top of standard-of-care therapy for HFrEF, thus obtaining indirect comparisons of the relative efficacy of the investigated study drugs [16,17].”
MethodAbdel-Rahman, O. M. (2016) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2016.1192466 · Cited by 16
“Data were assessed using a Bayesian meta-analysis approach(13, 14), conducted using WinBUGS 1.”
MethodLee, Y. H., & Bae, S. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-016-0254-4 · Cited by 16
“The network meta-analysis method improves statistical power and precision by assessing the comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions and combining evidence across a network of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), even in the absence of head-to-head comparisons [18].”
MethodZhang, J., Huang, Y., Wang, C., He, Y., Zheng, S., & Wu, K. (2017) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000007846 · Cited by 16
“Network meta-analysis can combine direct and indirect evidence from different studies simultaneously and compare all therapeutic methods to assess the relative efficacy of each treatment based on randomization,([12,13]) so it can assess the relative effects of different endocrine therapies better than traditional head…”
MethodEfficacy and safety of medical therapy for low bone mineral density in patients with Crohn disease
Zhao, X., Zhou, C., Chen, H., Ma, J., Zhu, Y., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Ma, H., & Zhang, H. (2017) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000006378 · Cited by 16
“Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. a Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, b Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, S., Wang, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, F., & Shi, Y. (2024) · BMC Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12890-024-03429-4 · Cited by 15
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis
Gallos, I. D., Yunas, I., Devall, A., Podesek, M., Tobı́as, A., Price, M. J., Oladapo, O. T., & Coomarasamy, A. (2025) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011689.pub4 · Cited by 21
“Caldwell 2005 Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.”
Crippa, S., Ricci, C., Guarneri, G., Ingaldi, C., Gasparini, G., Partelli, S., Casadei, R., & Falconi, M. (2021) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.001 · Cited by 16
Phillippo, D., Dias, S., Ades, A. E., Belger, M. A., Brnabic, A. J. M., Saure, D., Schymura, Y., & Welton, N. J. (2022) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x221117162 · Cited by 15
“Phillippo et al.13 introduced the general ML-NMR model, which we extend here for ordered categorical outcomes following the approach taken for AgD NMA.4,27”
InfluentialSelf-citationBi, A. S., Anil, U., Colasanti, C. A., Kwon, Y. W., Virk, M. S., Zuckerman, J. D., & Rokito, A. S. (2024) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465231204623 · Cited by 15
Bedrikovetski, S., Traeger, L., Seow, W., Dudi-Venkata, N. N., Selva‐Nayagam, S., Penniment, M. G., & Sammour, T. (2024) · Clinical Colorectal Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2024.06.001 · Cited by 15
Vieira, M. C., Kumar, R. N., & Jansen, J. P. (2011) · HIV Clinical Trials · doi:10.1310/hct1204-175 · Cited by 15
Lee, Y. H., Bae, S., & Song, G. G. (2015) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-015-3291-4 · Cited by 15
Bae, S., & Lee, Y. H. (2018) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-018-4002-9 · Cited by 15
“We used the Markov chain Monte Carlo method to obtain pooled effect sizes [12].”
InfluentialMultivariate network meta-analysis incorporating class effects
Owen, R. K., Bujkiewicz, S., Tincello, D. G., & Abrams, K. R. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01025-8 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., Yao, C., Qin, X., Xie, F., Luo, L., Li, T., & Feng, P. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/jcpt.13622 · Cited by 16
Xu, X., Shao, G., Zhang, X., Hu, Y., Huang, J., Su, Y., Zhang, M., Cai, Y., & Zhou, H. (2022) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114500 · Cited by 16
Hong, Y., Huang, W., Cao, D., Xu, J., Wei, H., Zhang, J., & Wang, L. (2022) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-022-06230-5 · Cited by 15
Wu, Q., Zhou, J., Huang, J. C., Deng, X., Li, C., Meng, W., He, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1093/bjs/znad120 · Cited by 15
Drug Class Review: Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs
McDonagh, M. S., Peterson, K., Carson, S., Fu, R., & Thakurta, S. (2010) · Cited by 14
Spatial variation and linear modeling of ecological data
Negrete‐Yankelevich, S., & Fox, G. A. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0011 · Cited by 15
Freeman, S. C., Fisher, D. J., Tierney, J. F., & Carpenter, J. R. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1300 · Cited by 14
“B ij j Bq ij j H t x s t a z z z z z z z (2)”
Treatment sequence network meta-analysis in Crohn’s disease: a methodological case study
Varu, A., Wilson, F. R., Dyrda, P., Hazel, M., Hutton, B., & Cameron, C. G. (2019) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1580094 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Caldwell, D. M., Ades, A. E., & Higgins, J. P. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Caldwell, Deborah M
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-10-13
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 7521
- Pages
- 897-900
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC1255806
- OpenAlex
- W1967385770
- Cited by
- 1,600
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 16.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Methemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome
- Keywords
- rasburicase, allopurinol, hyperuricemia, lymphoma, pediatric oncology, direct and indirect evidence, treatment comparison
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Making, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review