Cited by 45Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Sex differences in the composition of weight gain and loss in overweight and obese adults

Open access
Millward, D. Joe, Truby, Helen, Fox, Kenneth R., Livingstone, M. Barbara E., Macdonald, Ian A., Tothill, Peter·2014·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Sex differences in the ratio of fat mass (FM):fat-free mass (FFM) during weight change should differentially affect the extent of weight change during energy imbalance in men and women. In the present study, we determined FM and FFM contents by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and calculated the P-ratios (protein energy/total energy) of excess weight and weight loss during a randomised controlled trial of four commercial weight loss regimens. Overweight and obese women (n 210) and men (n 77) were studied at baseline and at 2 and 6 months during weight loss on four dietary regimens: Dr Atkins' New Diet Revolution; The Slim-Fast Plan; Weight-Watchers programme; Rosemary Conley's Diet and Fitness Plan. At baseline, the percentage of FFM (%FFM) and P-ratios of excess weight were 40 % and 0·071 for men and 27 % and 0·039 for women. At 2 months, men had lost twice as much weight as women and three times more FFM than women, indicating higher FFM content and P-ratios of weight loss for men, 0·052, than for women, 0·029, with no dietary effects. Between 2 and 6 months, the rate at which weight was lost decreased and the %FFM of weight loss decreased to similar low levels in men (7 %) and women (5 %): i.e. P-ratios of 0·009 and 0·006, respectively, with no dietary effects. Thus, for men compared with women, there were greater FFM content and P-ratios of weight change, which could partly, but not completely, explain their greater weight loss at 2 months. However, protein-conserving adaptations occur with increasing weight loss and over time, more extensively in men, eventually eliminating any sex difference in the composition of weight loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114513003103

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]37. Forbes GB (1988) Body composition: influence of nutrition, disease growth and ageing. In Modern Nutritional in Health and Disease, pp. 533-556 [ME Shils and VR Young, editors].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millward, D. J., Truby, H., Fox, K. R., Livingstone, M. B. E., Macdonald, I. A., & Tothill, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Millward, D. Joe
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
933-943
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2156235946
Cited by
45
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
sex differences, weight loss, fat mass, fat-free mass, energy-protein ratio, weight gain, obesity, overweight, energy imbalance, weight loss diet, protein conservation, fat-free mass loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Combined Modality Therapy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Reducing, Energy Metabolism, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Foods, Specialized, Adiposity, Overweight, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review