Cited by 1,242Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Effects of Estrogen Replacement on the Progression of Coronary-Artery Atherosclerosis

Open access
Herrington, David M., Reboussin, David M., Brosnihan, K. Bridget, Sharp, Penny C., Shumaker, Sally A., Snyder, Thomas E., Furberg, Curt D., Kowalchuk, Glen J. +4 more·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart disease is a major cause of illness and death in women. To understand better the role of estrogen in the treatment and prevention of heart disease, more information is needed about its effects on coronary atherosclerosis and the extent to which concomitant progestin therapy may modify these effects. METHODS: We randomly assigned a total of 309 women with angiographically verified coronary disease to receive 0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen per day, 0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day, or placebo. The women were followed for a mean (+/-SD) of 3.2+/-0.6 years. Base-line and follow-up coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS: Estrogen and estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate produced significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (9.4 percent and 16.5 percent, respectively) and significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (18.8 percent and 14.2 percent, respectively); however, neither treatment altered the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. After adjustment for measurements at base line, the mean (+/-SE) minimal coronary-artery diameters at follow-up were 1.87+/-0.02 mm, 1.84+/-0.02 mm, and 1.87+/-0.02 mm in women assigned to estrogen, estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, and placebo, respectively. The differences between the values for the two active-treatment groups and the value for the placebo group were not significant. Analyses of several secondary angiographic outcomes and subgroups of women produced similar results. The rates of clinical cardiovascular events were also similar among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neither estrogen alone nor estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate affected the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in women with established disease. These results suggest that such women should not use estrogen replacement with an expectation of cardiovascular benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200008243430801

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wenger NK. Cardioprotection for the postmenopausal women: HERS results and their implications. Prev Cardiol 1998;1:9-11.
  2. Vogel RA. Hypolipidemic intervention and plaque stabilization. In: Topol EJ, ed. Textbook of interventional cardiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1999:111-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrington, D. M., Reboussin, D. M., Brosnihan, K. B., Sharp, P. C., Shumaker, S. A., Snyder, T. E., Furberg, C. D., Kowalchuk, G. J., Stuckey, T. D., Rogers, W. J., Givens, D. H., & Waters, D.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Carolinas Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-08-24
Volume
343
Issue
8
Pages
522-529
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2332056249
Cited by
1,242
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 14
FWCI
133.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL 45488)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR-07122, M01RR007122)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
estrogen replacement therapy, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis progression, medroxyprogesterone acetate, conjugated estrogens, coronary artery disease in women, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, coronary artery diameter, cardiovascular events, menopause
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Triglycerides, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Coronary Angiography, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Postmenopause, Disease Progression, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review