Cited by 226Sleep and related disordersObesity, Physical Activity, DietSleep and Wakefulness Research

Longitudinal analysis of sleep in relation to BMI and body fat in children: the FLAME study

Open access
Carter, P. J., Taylor, B. J., Williams, S. M., Taylor, R. W.·2011·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether reduced sleep is associated with differences in body composition and the risk of becoming overweight in young children. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with repeated annual measurements. SETTING: Dunedin, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 244 children recruited from a birth cohort and followed from age 3 to 7. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body mass index (BMI), fat mass (kg), and fat free mass (kg) measured with bioelectrical impedance; dual energy x ray absorptiometry; physical activity and sleep duration measured with accelerometry; dietary intake (fruit and vegetables, non-core foods), television viewing, and family factors (maternal BMI and education, birth weight, smoking during pregnancy) measured with questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjustment for multiple confounders, each additional hour of sleep at ages 3-5 was associated with a reduction in BMI of 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.96) and a reduced risk of being overweight (BMI ≥ 85th centile) of 0.39 (0.24 to 0.63) at age 7. Further adjustment for BMI at age 3 strengthened these relations. These differences in BMI were explained by differences in fat mass index (-0.43, -0.82 to -0.03) more than by differences in fat free mass index (-0.21, -0.41 to -0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Young children who do not get enough sleep are at increased risk of becoming overweight, even after adjustment for initial weight status and multiple confounding factors. This weight gain is a result of increased fat deposition in both sexes rather than additional accumulation of fat free mass.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.d2712

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In pediatric populations, all 12 longitudinal studies found a positive association between short sleep and later obesity risk.

    “This pattern is particularly consistent in pediatric populations (all 12 studies had positive findings; reviewed in [80]; additional references: [21, 38, 89, 150]).”

    From Sleep and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Among 28 longitudinal studies on short sleep and later obesity risk in children and adults, 22 found that short sleep was linked to greater weight gain, obesity, or fat mass after a few years.

    “Of the 28 longitudinal studies that examined the impact of short sleep on obesity risk in children and adults, 22 reported that short sleep is associated with an increased risk of weight gain or development of obesity and/or increased fat mass a few years later”

    From Sleep and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The only pediatric prospective study with objective sleep, weight, and body-composition measures showed that greater weight gain in children who slept less came from selective fat deposition.

    “Importantly, the only pediatric prospective study that obtained concomitant objective measurements of sleep, weight, and body composition demonstrated that the increased weight gain in children sleeping less was the result of selective increased fat deposition [21].”

    From Sleep and metabolic function (2012) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Only one included study used polysomnography and three used accelerometry to assess sleep.

    “Only one used the gold-standard polysomnography 36 and three used accelerometry.29,45,56”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, P. J., Taylor, B. J., Williams, S. M., & Taylor, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
  • Taylor, B. J.
  • Taylor, R. W.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-05-26
Volume
342
Issue
may26 2
Pages
d2712-d2712
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2143436885
Cited by
226
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Otago
  • National Heart Foundation of New Zealand
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep duration, childhood obesity, body mass index, body composition, fat mass, fat-free mass, overweight risk, young children, Dunedin birth cohort, television viewing, maternal body mass index, birth weight, physical activity
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Sleep, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review