Cited by 282Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric AcidGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Association of plasma uric acid with ischaemic heart disease and blood pressure: mendelian randomisation analysis of two large cohorts

Open access
Palmer, T. M., Nordestgaard, B. G., Benn, M., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A., Davey Smith, G., Lawlor, D. A., Timpson, N. J.·2013·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the associations between both uric acid levels and hyperuricaemia, with ischaemic heart disease and blood pressure, and to explore the potentially confounding role of body mass index. DESIGN: Mendelian randomisation analysis, using variation at specific genes (SLC2A9 (rs7442295) as an instrument for uric acid; and FTO (rs9939609), MC4R (rs17782313), and TMEM18 (rs6548238) for body mass index). SETTING: Two large, prospective cohort studies in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: We measured levels of uric acid and related covariables in 58,072 participants from the Copenhagen General Population Study and 10,602 from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, comprising 4890 and 2282 cases of ischaemic heart disease, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME: Blood pressure and prospectively assessed ischaemic heart disease. RESULTS: Estimates confirmed known observational associations between plasma uric acid and hyperuricaemia with risk of ischaemic heart disease and diastolic and systolic blood pressure. However, when using genotypic instruments for uric acid and hyperuricaemia, we saw no evidence for causal associations between uric acid, ischaemic heart disease, and blood pressure. We used genetic instruments to investigate body mass index as a potentially confounding factor in observational associations, and saw a causal effect on uric acid levels. Every four unit increase of body mass index saw a rise in uric acid of 0.03 mmol/L (95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.04), and an increase in risk of hyperuricaemia of 7.5% (3.9% to 11.1%). CONCLUSION: By contrast with observational findings, there is no strong evidence for causal associations between uric acid and ischaemic heart disease or blood pressure. However, evidence supports a causal effect between body mass index and uric acid level and hyperuricaemia. This finding strongly suggests body mass index as a confounder in observational associations, and suggests a role for elevated body mass index or obesity in the development of uric acid related conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f4262

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has shown that genetic variants associated with BMI are associated with CRP levels and uric acid concentrations, but the reverse was not found for genetic variants which are plausible instrumental variables for CRP and uric acid.

    “Previous research has shown that genetic variants associated with BMI are associated with CRP levels30,39 and associated with uric acid concentrations,40 although in both cases the reverse was not found for genetic variants which are plausible IVs for CRP and for uric acid.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, T. M., Nordestgaard, B. G., Benn, M., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A., Davey Smith, G., Lawlor, D. A., & Timpson, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Timpson, N. J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-07-18
Volume
347
Issue
jul18 1
Pages
f4262-f4262
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137796179
Cited by
282
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 7
FWCI
26.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hjerteforeningen
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
plasma uric acid, hyperuricemia, ischemic heart disease, blood pressure, body mass index, confounding, causal inference, SLC2A9, FTO, melanocortin-4 receptor, TMEM18, obesity, genetic instruments
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Uric Acid, Body Mass Index, Myocardial Ischemia, Hyperuricemia, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review